Ericlindn

Ericlindn — CS2 Stats

SG76561198108518897[U:1:148253169]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,495Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,040Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,009Top 25% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43467 of 259685 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,523 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+360Premier CS Rating · 22,649 → 23,009
0Faceit ELO · 1,523 → 1,523
+1Tracked matches · now 1,495
+3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,009 +1,614 26 Aug – 3 Nov · 33 days played
19,32523,009peak 23,00926 Aug3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,523 +0 17 Sept – 2 Nov · 2 observations
1,5231,523peak 1,52317 Sept2 Nov
23,009Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,523Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,523
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 8 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,009
  • +1,594 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,991 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate39.2%45.7%46.8%7.6% short
Shot accuracy9.3%12.7%13.0%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.021.051.060.05 short
Match win rate45.8%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEriclindnFACEITLevel 7 · 1,523 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,009 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,523csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning66
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateWLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +6.5pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.2
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels7.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time534ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 29 Aug →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · inferno, 14 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · nuke, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · train, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC228–1436%-0.01
cacheA149–564%0.02
dust2B136–746%-0.01
mirageS139–469%0.05
nukeB105–550%-0.02
anubisD93–633%-0.02
ancientD93–633%-0.02
vertigoB63–350%0.01
overpass—20–20%-0.05
train—21–150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,650Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
3,881Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
39.2%Headshot %
9.3%Shot accuracy
8,224MVPs
2,040Hours (in match)
2,918Bombs planted
970Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,740
AWP11,046
P901,317
SG 5531,006

Lifetime map wins

6,224inferno
5,283dust2
3,469nuke
1,380train
1,243office
1,101vertigo
372italy
335assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

443Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14247%1.0415.5
Ancient7855%1.1415.7
Inferno6653%1.1615.6
Nuke4154%1.0515.6
Dust23438%1.0114.3
Anubis2850%0.9414.2
Overpass2759%1.0113.8
Cache2152%1.0014.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
535msReaction time
66.5%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
10.48HE damage / grenade
8.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–8-0.0222%3 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0532%2 Nov →
dust213–1-0.0321%2 Nov →
nuke13–60.0350%1 Nov →
inferno13–7-0.0417%1 Nov →
dust213–60.0622%31 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0633%30 Oct →
mirage13–50.0916%29 Oct →
vertigo9–6-0.0122%28 Oct →
dust213–110.0519%28 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0416%26 Oct →
cache13–90.0221%26 Oct →
mirage13–70.076%25 Oct →
dust213–160.0323%22 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0613%21 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0126%21 Oct →
nuke16–130.0725%21 Oct →
mirage13–90.0416%21 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0127%20 Oct →
inferno6–130.0416%20 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1112%19 Oct →
anubis11–130.0230%19 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0322%19 Oct →
vertigo6–90.0212%18 Oct →
vertigo9–2-0.0150%18 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1146%15 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.1318%14 Oct →
inferno6–90.0455%14 Oct →
inferno8–80.0426%14 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0224%12 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0221%12 Oct →
overpass2–9-0.1128%11 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0425%11 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0110%11 Oct →
train13–00.0523%11 Oct →
train9–130.0520%10 Oct →
inferno9–10.0524%8 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0633%8 Oct →
mirage13–60.0818%6 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.033%4 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0717%4 Oct →
inferno13–80.0321%3 Oct →
ancient7–130.1024%2 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0433%30 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0419%29 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0311%29 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0722%28 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0414%28 Sept →
overpass4–9-0.0020%27 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0211%26 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0517%25 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0117%25 Sept →
mirage13–60.0041%25 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0217%24 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.1713%24 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0424%24 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0819%24 Sept →
inferno4–90.0331%21 Sept →
ancient4–130.0226%21 Sept →
inferno9–20.0513%21 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.019%21 Sept →
anubis13–90.0425%20 Sept →
inferno7–20.0513%20 Sept →
cache13–100.0121%20 Sept →
dust211–130.0621%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0131%20 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0525%20 Sept →
cache13–80.0424%19 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1733%19 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0319%19 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0133%18 Sept →
nuke9–60.0453%17 Sept →
inferno11–130.0521%17 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0731%16 Sept →
vertigo9–5-0.0625%16 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0417%14 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.0921%14 Sept →
inferno13–80.0824%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0618%13 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0232%9 Sept →
mirage6–130.0422%9 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.1010%9 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0417%8 Sept →
inferno6–90.0924%8 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0229%6 Sept →
inferno6–90.0530%5 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0339%5 Sept →
mirage13–100.1122%5 Sept →
cache4–10.0627%5 Sept →
mirage7–10.0447%5 Sept →
nuke9–50.0635%5 Sept →
mirage13–70.1020%4 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0136%2 Sept →
cache6–130.1335%2 Sept →
mirage3–130.0321%2 Sept →
cache13–100.0419%30 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0621%29 Aug →
cache13–10.1520%29 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0215%26 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.0730%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.