tuc

tuc — CS2 Stats

76561198107429571[U:1:147163843]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,071Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,260 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,260 → 1,260
+9Tracked matches · now 1,071
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 9 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,847 +175 9 Mar24 Apr · 14 days played
21,18523,769peak 23,7699 Mar24 Apr
23,769Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,260Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,260
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 91 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtucFACEITLevel 7 · 1,260 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,260csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning52
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateTWLLLWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 696ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 688ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time697ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 697ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 23 Aug
57%Best headshot accuracy · 2–8 · cache, 14 May
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 3 Apr
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
32In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%-0.01
infernoA149564%0.00
cacheB126650%-0.01
nukeS128467%0.00
anubisC104640%0.02
overpassB84450%-0.01
vertigoS64267%0.02
ancientD51420%-0.01
alpine21150%-0.08
train2020%-0.00
dust22020%-0.11
office110100%0.15
stronghold110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

796Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
79.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13057%1.1715.8
Ancient4547%1.0316.1
Inferno4149%1.0515.4
Nuke3447%1.0415.2
Dust21346%1.1417.1
Anubis933%1.1016.3
Train10%1.0016.0
Vertigo10%0.356.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
688msReaction time
20.6%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
6.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.6372% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass8–8-0.0717%14 Sept
vertigo13–40.0820%12 Sept
cache1–13-0.0428%12 Sept
mirage8–130.0126%6 Sept
anubis7–130.0217%5 Sept
nuke13–100.0325%5 Sept
vertigo13–60.0725%4 Sept
office13–70.1528%4 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0319%1 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0213%23 Aug
anubis13–10.1628%23 Aug
nuke13–90.1228%23 Aug
anubis10–130.0123%18 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0216%14 Jun
mirage13–90.0314%7 Jun
mirage5–130.0431%7 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0223%7 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0314%6 Jun
vertigo13–6-0.0126%6 Jun
cache13–80.0115%6 Jun
cache13–40.0218%6 Jun
anubis13–100.0324%2 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0217%1 Jun
alpine13–3-0.0930%29 May
cache9–13-0.0127%26 May
cache8–130.0214%24 May
alpine10–13-0.0714%23 May
mirage7–13-0.0126%23 May
vertigo8–8-0.0024%20 May
cache5–13-0.0615%18 May
cache13–9-0.0419%14 May
cache2–80.0157%14 May
inferno6–13-0.0624%7 May
cache13–80.0416%7 May
cache13–10-0.0024%6 May
cache13–9-0.0137%6 May
cache6–13-0.0722%6 May
mirage1–4-0.050%24 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0416%24 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0219%24 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0614%19 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0013%19 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0210%19 Apr
mirage8–130.0121%13 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0717%13 Apr
nuke13–30.0418%5 Apr
overpass13–1-0.0518%5 Apr
anubis2–130.0121%5 Apr
train9–130.0212%4 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0631%4 Apr
nuke3–130.0725%4 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0325%4 Apr
ancient3–130.0135%4 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0621%4 Apr
anubis4–130.018%3 Apr
mirage3–13-0.016%31 Mar
overpass10–130.0415%30 Mar
overpass0–5-0.0520%30 Mar
mirage5–130.0129%27 Mar
anubis5–130.0318%27 Mar
inferno13–70.0332%27 Mar
inferno13–100.0217%24 Mar
mirage13–50.0723%24 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0021%24 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0423%24 Mar
inferno2–90.0333%24 Mar
mirage12–16-0.0321%23 Mar
overpass13–110.0216%21 Mar
ancient15–150.0116%21 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0024%21 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0514%20 Mar
anubis13–30.0419%20 Mar
nuke13–90.0317%20 Mar
dust25–13-0.1317%20 Mar
overpass13–70.0225%20 Mar
inferno13–70.1118%20 Mar
mirage13–50.0318%19 Mar
mirage13–80.0124%19 Mar
inferno13–90.0220%19 Mar
vertigo9–40.0232%18 Mar
inferno14–16-0.0119%17 Mar
overpass13–70.0626%17 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0421%17 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0619%17 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0627%17 Mar
mirage16–130.0122%16 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0718%16 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0013%16 Mar
mirage13–50.0522%16 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0113%12 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0724%12 Mar
mirage13–70.0222%12 Mar
nuke9–130.0220%11 Mar
train10–13-0.0326%10 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0224%10 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0227%10 Mar
dust20–13-0.0926%10 Mar
stronghold13–8-0.0016%10 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0611%9 Mar
inferno13–80.0114%9 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →