M.A.D.

M.A.D. — CS2 Stats

US76561198107371545[U:1:147105817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

937Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,323Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 4 · 920 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 920 → 920
+3Tracked matches · now 937
−3.3ppWin rate · 63.3% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 3 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 920 +0 28 Aug2 Sept · 4 observations
920920peak 92028 Aug2 Sept
920Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-03-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 920
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate47.9%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy16.4%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.130.991.02above
Match win rate47.2%43.9%44.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM.A.D.FACEITLevel 4 · 920 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO920csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning10
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50464Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +8.1pp headshot accuracy · +312ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 454ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility2.3
Positioning1.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 53 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning1.0
Utility2.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time275ms−391ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 275ms
Headshot accuracy8.8%−9.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 8.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 7–2 · office, 22 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 26 May
438msFastest reaction time · 7–2 · office, 22 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 16 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
167In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17mirageWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB1910953%-0.02
nukeS1711665%-0.01
mirageC1661038%-0.01
dust2C125742%-0.02
anubisB115645%-0.02
overpassB63350%-0.01
ancient42250%0.01
cache31233%-0.03
inferno32167%-0.03
train31233%-0.06
vertigo220100%-0.03
alpine21150%-0.06
sanctum1010%0.00
poseidon110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,870Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,789Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
47.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
7,747MVPs
1,184Hours (in match)
1,882Bombs planted
1,470Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,308
AWP3,340
MP92,389
AUG2,218
SG 5532,065

Lifetime map wins

4,108dust2
3,224inferno
2,884nuke
1,745vertigo
1,374train
391office
388lake
125safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

424Matches
49%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
57.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4245%0.6411.1
Ancient3244%0.729.8
Anubis3050%0.7611.3
Nuke1471%1.3012.3
Dust21450%0.7111.4
Vertigo1338%0.7110.8
Train1164%0.799.6
Inferno1060%0.6710.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.3%Headshot accuracy
16.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
6.5°Preaim
329msReaction time
8.3%T opening success
18.9%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
4.34HE damage / grenade
8.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.2563% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2925 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 8.3171% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–13-0.097%16 Sept
cache4–13-0.0137%3 Sept
nuke13–80.009%3 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0216%25 Aug
mirage13–60.0419%22 Aug
office7–20.1522%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0510%21 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0521%21 Aug
vertigo13–70.0123%10 Aug
mirage9–130.0723%10 Aug
ancient11–130.0621%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0211%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0536%27 Jun
nuke22–20-0.0420%27 Jun
office13–11-0.0416%15 Jun
anubis9–130.000%14 Jun
dust29–130.000%14 Jun
nuke13–80.000%14 Jun
mirage4–130.000%14 Jun
ancient13–30.000%14 Jun
mirage14–160.000%14 Jun
nuke13–20.000%14 Jun
anubis13–90.000%14 Jun
mirage13–70.000%13 Jun
dust24–130.000%13 Jun
ancient13–90.000%13 Jun
mirage13–80.000%13 Jun
nuke13–60.000%13 Jun
dust213–50.000%12 Jun
nuke7–130.000%12 Jun
mirage10–130.000%12 Jun
inferno13–110.000%7 Jun
mirage13–110.000%6 Jun
alpine12–12-0.0920%26 May
nuke13–30.0338%26 May
office3–13-0.1114%26 May
inferno9–13-0.0324%25 May
anubis6–13-0.0118%25 May
train3–13-0.0519%25 May
overpass22–20-0.0216%18 May
nuke8–13-0.025%16 May
office11–13-0.0423%16 May
anubis13–10.0317%16 May
nuke13–30.0215%15 May
office13–9-0.0018%15 May
anubis13–60.0115%13 May
dust212–16-0.1013%13 May
mirage10–13-0.0715%13 May
nuke6–13-0.0715%13 May
dust216–13-0.0319%12 May
overpass4–9-0.0519%11 May
sanctum8–80.0028%11 May
poseidon9–5-0.0415%11 May
office5–13-0.0532%9 May
office13–30.0326%9 May
anubis3–13-0.0224%8 May
office4–13-0.0223%8 May
office13–11-0.096%8 May
office7–13-0.0224%8 May
office10–13-0.0417%8 May
office13–11-0.0433%5 May
office13–10-0.0021%3 May
train13–8-0.0427%3 May
cache12–12-0.0419%3 May
office7–130.0315%3 May
office13–11-0.0017%3 May
inferno13–9-0.0723%2 May
office13–10-0.0513%2 May
anubis3–13-0.0624%2 May
anubis16–14-0.048%2 May
mirage9–13-0.0419%1 May
nuke9–13-0.0133%1 May
dust213–11-0.0313%1 May
dust213–8-0.0415%19 Apr
nuke13–100.0326%19 Apr
alpine13–9-0.0326%19 Apr
mirage16–140.0316%18 Apr
dust215–15-0.0416%18 Apr
office7–13-0.0121%13 Apr
office13–11-0.0618%13 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0516%13 Apr
overpass13–110.0414%13 Apr
nuke13–90.0010%3 Apr
dust26–13-0.0220%3 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0518%3 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0014%2 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0720%2 Apr
anubis16–130.0218%30 Mar
nuke13–60.0424%25 Mar
dust211–13-0.0521%25 Mar
overpass13–50.0513%24 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0217%24 Mar
dust213–20.069%24 Mar
train4–13-0.1011%4 Mar
office7–13-0.0217%4 Mar
vertigo13–11-0.0815%4 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0219%4 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0430%4 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0621%3 Mar
dust211–13-0.0317%3 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →