Abyssus

Abyssus — CS2 Stats

DE76561198104743094[U:1:144477366]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,847Tracked matches36%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,208Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+48Tracked matches · now 1,847
−8.3ppWin rate · 44.0% → 35.7%

Rating over time

28Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.5%42.7%43.8%1.2% short
Shot accuracy0.6%11.2%12.0%11.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.650.991.02above
Match win rate52.7%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAbyssusFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning56
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37–51–12Last 10037%Win rateWLLLLLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.4 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility4.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch10.0

Strong T-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 28% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.6
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time573ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy12.0%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 15 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 2–6 · office, 29 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · office, 15 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · office, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC3013–1743%0.01
dust2D154–1127%0.02
ancientD113–827%-0.00
infernoB84–450%0.04
mirageD72–529%-0.01
cacheD60–60%0.03
nukeD62–433%-0.00
vertigoA53–260%0.03
anubisC52–340%0.03
train—32–167%0.01
poseidon—20–20%0.05
italy—11–0100%0.04
debris—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

82,217Lifetime kills
1.65K/D · Top 5% of Level 4 players
4,119Matches
52.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 4 players
42.5%Headshot %
0.6%Shot accuracy
19,508MVPs
1,208Hours (in match)
5,511Bombs planted
1,604Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,060
AWP7,219
SG 5533,653
MP92,730
Tec-92,591

Lifetime map wins

4,261dust2
3,760inferno
2,896nuke
2,702vertigo
996train
985office
211italy
69safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
86.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220%1.0715.0
Mirage10%1.0715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
572msReaction time
63.4%T opening success
27.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
9.75HE damage / grenade
7.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.9546% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 27.948% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–5-0.0524%29 Oct →
office2–13-0.099%29 Oct →
office6–130.075%29 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0712%29 Oct →
ancient5–130.0017%29 Oct →
office8–13-0.0013%29 Oct →
office2–13-0.0519%29 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0315%21 Oct →
office13–10.0122%20 Oct →
vertigo12–120.006%20 Oct →
office13–110.1210%20 Oct →
dust25–13-0.027%20 Oct →
ancient13–70.079%20 Oct →
office12–120.0515%18 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.047%18 Oct →
ancient4–130.018%18 Oct →
office7–130.0318%16 Oct →
vertigo13–70.064%16 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0115%16 Oct →
mirage5–130.0210%16 Oct →
inferno13–80.0113%16 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.025%16 Oct →
office13–100.0921%15 Oct →
dust213–30.1916%15 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0314%14 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0527%14 Oct →
office4–13-0.040%13 Oct →
dust211–130.019%13 Oct →
office1–13-0.127%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.019%8 Oct →
train13–20.0210%8 Oct →
train13–100.0412%8 Oct →
train3–13-0.039%8 Oct →
office6–130.0212%6 Oct →
ancient13–40.0717%6 Oct →
poseidon8–80.1031%6 Oct →
nuke9–7-0.033%6 Oct →
inferno9–5-0.0033%6 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.008%4 Oct →
office7–13-0.0114%1 Oct →
dust212–120.059%1 Oct →
cache12–120.0621%1 Oct →
office11–130.0810%29 Sept →
office2–60.0344%29 Sept →
dust213–1-0.019%29 Sept →
ancient12–12-0.0111%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0012%27 Sept →
office9–130.027%26 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0116%26 Sept →
italy13–70.0410%26 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.039%26 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0827%26 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.039%23 Sept →
inferno9–130.0217%23 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0519%22 Sept →
anubis12–120.0922%22 Sept →
office9–130.0117%22 Sept →
office13–90.0119%21 Sept →
cache6–130.0729%21 Sept →
office13–11-0.0316%21 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0530%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0213%21 Sept →
office9–130.0014%20 Sept →
office12–20.0229%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0315%20 Sept →
mirage12–120.0523%20 Sept →
office7–13-0.0429%19 Sept →
cache12–120.0015%19 Sept →
inferno4–130.0718%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0116%19 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0317%19 Sept →
office13–00.0318%16 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0214%16 Sept →
dust212–120.0419%16 Sept →
office1–13-0.1124%15 Sept →
dust212–120.0318%15 Sept →
cache11–130.0120%15 Sept →
dust213–110.0923%14 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0210%14 Sept →
cache10–130.0627%14 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0028%14 Sept →
dust29–130.0418%8 Sept →
office13–9-0.0312%2 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0215%2 Sept →
office13–10.1419%2 Sept →
office13–50.1119%31 Aug →
dust24–130.0016%31 Aug →
inferno13–70.1415%31 Aug →
office5–13-0.0115%30 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0114%30 Aug →
poseidon8–80.0015%30 Aug →
debris9–30.0512%30 Aug →
inferno9–70.1329%30 Aug →
nuke2–130.0012%30 Aug →
anubis13–70.0613%30 Aug →
office13–20.109%28 Aug →
nuke13–60.0411%28 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0115%28 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0410%28 Aug →
anubis9–130.0512%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.