Str1ke

Str1ke — CS2 Stats

US76561198101105344[U:1:140839616]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,228Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,698Top 50% of 213,542 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,931 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,698 +199 7 Jun – 6 Nov · 15 days played
16,55620,750peak 20,7507 Jun6 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,931 +0 29 Aug – 6 Sept · 3 observations
1,9311,931peak 1,93129 Aug6 Sept
20,750Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,931Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-06-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,931
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,052 below peak (20,750)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,302 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStr1keFACEITLevel 7 · 1,931 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,698 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,931csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning59
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateTWWLWWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time590ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 7–13 · dust2, 22 Oct →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 3–10 · vertigo, 22 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · anubis, 19 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C228–1436%-0.00
ancientC207–1335%-0.02
mirageC176–1135%-0.02
cacheB137–654%0.01
anubisB115–645%-0.01
infernoD72–529%-0.02
nukeS64–267%0.00
poseidon—10–10%0.06
fachwerk—10–10%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

861Matches
49%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
74.7ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24249%0.9113.4
Ancient12054%1.0115.0
Dust210545%0.9314.0
Anubis9250%1.0314.2
Inferno7636%0.9613.7
Nuke3959%1.0814.2
Overpass3551%0.8412.3
Vertigo2370%0.9514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
580msReaction time
54.7%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.87HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–12-0.0122%7 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0117%6 Nov →
dust213–60.059%4 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0113%4 Nov →
anubis13–90.0815%3 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0416%3 Nov →
dust213–80.0717%27 Oct →
poseidon6–90.0622%23 Oct →
fachwerk12–12-0.0222%23 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0410%23 Oct →
ancient13–1-0.028%22 Oct →
dust27–130.0920%22 Oct →
vertigo3–10-0.0136%22 Oct →
ancient20–22-0.0215%22 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0114%21 Oct →
dust213–60.0813%21 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.048%21 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0519%21 Oct →
dust212–120.0213%21 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0110%20 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0826%20 Oct →
anubis3–130.038%20 Oct →
ancient9–130.0512%15 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0225%15 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.008%15 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0422%15 Oct →
dust211–10.0213%14 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.028%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0124%9 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0112%9 Oct →
ancient13–30.0612%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0513%6 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0711%5 Oct →
inferno13–100.006%5 Oct →
ancient13–90.0310%5 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0418%5 Oct →
ancient13–30.0111%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0614%1 Oct →
nuke13–80.0313%30 Sept →
nuke13–20.028%30 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.056%29 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0322%29 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0320%9 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.037%5 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0715%3 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.069%3 Sept →
cache4–130.0315%3 Sept →
cache13–80.0913%3 Sept →
cache13–110.0614%3 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0216%3 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0419%2 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0110%29 Aug →
cache3–13-0.017%29 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0214%29 Aug →
cache16–140.0424%29 Aug →
ancient3–7-0.0713%29 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0211%28 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0527%28 Aug →
mirage8–130.0217%28 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0515%28 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0112%26 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0411%26 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0314%26 Aug →
mirage3–130.0322%25 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0530%21 Aug →
inferno3–7-0.0511%21 Aug →
cache13–110.0511%20 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0420%20 Aug →
dust210–130.0214%20 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0611%20 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0410%19 Aug →
anubis6–2-0.0719%19 Aug →
ancient11–130.0316%19 Aug →
dust211–130.078%19 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.055%18 Aug →
nuke9–20.0410%12 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0314%3 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0426%25 Jul →
dust213–60.0113%25 Jul →
cache13–9-0.017%24 Jul →
mirage13–110.011%24 Jul →
ancient13–50.008%24 Jul →
mirage16–130.029%24 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0623%14 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0013%13 Jul →
nuke13–60.008%6 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.1014%6 Jul →
dust25–13-0.170%20 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0324%20 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0216%20 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.029%16 Jun →
ancient13–110.0314%10 Jun →
anubis13–60.0621%9 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0112%7 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0119%7 Jun →
anubis13–50.0114%7 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0315%7 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0213%7 Jun →
dust213–90.0716%7 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0413%7 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.