CRANKERR

CRANKERR — CS2 Stats

BE76561198100923889[U:1:140658161]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,595Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,354Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,297Purple band · top ~23.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,261 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,297 +21 2 Aug – 24 Sept · 26 days played
15,76218,405peak 18,4052 Aug24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,261 +0 2 Sept – 19 Sept · 2 observations
1,2611,261peak 1,2612 Sept19 Sept
18,405Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,261Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,261
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 90 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,108 below peak (18,405)
  • -1,809 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,703 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches27——
Win rate37%——
K/D1.19——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.2%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy14.6%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.021.03meets
Match win rate39.2%44.7%45.2%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCRANKERRFACEITLevel 5 · 1,261 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,297 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,261csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning52
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −7.5pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.2
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time569ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 25 Jul →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 7 Sept →
430msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 13 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 16ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%0.04
dust2A2112–957%0.02
nukeA1610–663%0.01
infernoA116–555%0.05
anubisD103–730%0.04
cacheA85–363%0.04
ancientD51–420%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.09
boulder—21–150%0.04
fachwerk—11–0100%0.04
shelter—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

125,505Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,266Matches
39.2%Match win rate
48.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13,954MVPs
3,755Hours (in match)
4,325Bombs planted
1,032Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4743,624
AWP23,659
SSG 082,544
Knife1,847
FAMAS1,598

Lifetime map wins

8,282inferno
4,430dust2
3,171nuke
3,089train
1,727vertigo
53safehouse
47lake
20ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

482Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
82.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2952%1.3714.9
Dust21638%1.2217.6
Inferno1464%1.4020.8
Nuke1060%1.1215.3
Ancient956%1.3919.1
Overpass667%1.0313.5
Anubis425%0.9214.0
Cache367%1.3217.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
573msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
10.40HE damage / grenade
17.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0785% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0216%2 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0127%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0725%2 Oct →
mirage7–70.0518%24 Sept →
anubis0–20.0025%24 Sept →
anubis13–80.0917%24 Sept →
anubis13–100.1019%24 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0310%23 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.0614%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0421%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0332%16 Sept →
mirage11–130.0412%15 Sept →
inferno8–130.0326%15 Sept →
mirage8–130.0132%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.0224%9 Sept →
inferno8–80.0931%7 Sept →
dust29–130.0554%7 Sept →
mirage3–130.0318%6 Sept →
mirage3–130.0221%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0717%3 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0622%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0122%1 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0118%1 Sept →
anubis10–130.0618%1 Sept →
inferno13–40.1420%30 Aug →
mirage9–130.0113%30 Aug →
ancient13–70.1113%28 Aug →
dust215–150.0911%28 Aug →
inferno13–80.0320%27 Aug →
inferno13–20.085%27 Aug →
mirage13–60.1222%27 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0213%27 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0124%27 Aug →
mirage13–90.0537%27 Aug →
cache13–70.0817%26 Aug →
mirage9–130.0125%25 Aug →
dust213–70.0916%22 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0518%21 Aug →
dust213–90.0028%21 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0221%20 Aug →
nuke6–3-0.0116%20 Aug →
anubis14–160.0513%17 Aug →
mirage14–160.0313%14 Aug →
inferno13–40.0523%14 Aug →
ancient7–130.0017%14 Aug →
cache13–60.0326%13 Aug →
dust213–90.0442%13 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.088%13 Aug →
dust213–50.0423%13 Aug →
nuke13–100.0418%12 Aug →
mirage13–90.1318%10 Aug →
nuke8–130.0120%10 Aug →
dust213–70.0023%10 Aug →
mirage13–100.0916%10 Aug →
dust27–130.0128%9 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0214%8 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0220%4 Aug →
nuke13–20.0418%4 Aug →
dust210–130.0028%4 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0113%4 Aug →
mirage4–130.0339%3 Aug →
mirage13–160.0212%3 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.0117%3 Aug →
nuke13–80.0618%2 Aug →
mirage13–40.1417%2 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0524%2 Aug →
anubis15–150.0319%2 Aug →
vertigo8–80.0319%2 Aug →
nuke13–50.0817%2 Aug →
nuke13–70.0621%2 Aug →
nuke9–130.0427%30 Jul →
inferno13–100.0123%30 Jul →
anubis11–130.0523%30 Jul →
mirage13–50.0420%30 Jul →
cache9–130.0619%30 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0517%30 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0413%26 Jul →
dust24–10-0.0113%26 Jul →
inferno13–90.1123%26 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0743%25 Jul →
boulder13–30.0413%25 Jul →
cache13–50.2423%25 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0229%23 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0616%23 Jul →
mirage13–90.0514%23 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0327%23 Jul →
dust213–80.0422%23 Jul →
nuke3–5-0.0511%23 Jul →
boulder12–120.0522%21 Jul →
fachwerk13–90.0420%21 Jul →
nuke13–110.0626%21 Jul →
inferno8–130.0624%20 Jul →
vertigo13–30.1518%20 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0319%18 Jul →
shelter6–130.0328%18 Jul →
dust215–150.0317%13 Jul →
dust213–90.0526%11 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0327%8 Jul →
anubis13–90.1017%8 Jul →
dust213–90.0819%7 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.