ⁿᵘˡˡᵗᵃᵍ

ⁿᵘˡˡᵗᵃᵍ — CS2 Stats

MT76561198100156200[U:1:139890472]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,908Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,588Light Blue band · top ~71.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 691 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,588 +158 30 Aug – 7 Oct · 9 days played
6,4307,212peak 7,21230 Aug7 Oct
Faceit ELO: 691 +0 31 Aug – 23 Sept · 4 observations
691691peak 69131 Aug23 Sept
7,212Peak Premier in tracked matches
691Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 691
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 60 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 624 below peak (7,212)
  • -397 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,412 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGⁿᵘˡˡᵗᵃᵍFACEITLevel 2 · 691 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER6,588 · Light Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO691csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim28
Positioning52
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37–57–6Last 10037%Win rateLWWWWLWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim2.8
Utility5.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 58% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 54% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.8
Positioning5.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics1.0
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time662ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 10–3 · vertigo, 10 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 1 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 11 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D258–1732%-0.02
mirageC166–1038%-0.02
infernoC145–936%-0.03
cacheD124–833%-0.02
nukeD123–925%-0.02
vertigoS75–271%-0.00
ancientD62–433%-0.02
anubis—32–167%-0.02
office—22–0100%0.01
rush_001—10–10%-0.07
shelter—10–10%-0.12
overpass—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

166Matches
44%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
73.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2948%0.8512.2
Ancient2556%0.8011.8
Nuke2250%0.9316.6
Dust21631%0.8513.3
Inferno1547%0.7011.2
Vertigo1315%0.7511.8
Mirage1127%0.8513.2
Train1060%0.9514.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy
28.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
54.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
661msReaction time
57.4%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
5.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.9174% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.7932% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0113%14 Oct →
inferno13–10.027%14 Oct →
vertigo13–1-0.0222%14 Oct →
mirage13–10.0710%14 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0116%14 Oct →
dust27–130.0513%12 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.088%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0723%11 Oct →
dust24–13-0.1212%11 Oct →
cache12–120.0118%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0927%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0310%9 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0420%9 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0613%9 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0610%9 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0223%7 Oct →
dust213–5-0.018%7 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.039%7 Oct →
inferno7–130.047%7 Oct →
dust27–13-0.044%6 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.048%6 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0312%4 Oct →
mirage9–130.0518%4 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0816%4 Oct →
vertigo13–9-0.027%3 Oct →
dust213–50.0612%3 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0225%2 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0115%2 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.075%1 Oct →
dust29–130.0032%1 Oct →
rush_0017–8-0.070%1 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0913%30 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0912%30 Sept →
cache8–130.0226%30 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.108%30 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0016%29 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0412%29 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0313%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.073%27 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0511%24 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0419%24 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.056%23 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0714%23 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0110%23 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0611%22 Sept →
cache11–130.0314%22 Sept →
anubis5–130.0112%22 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0015%22 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.1013%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0515%19 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0511%18 Sept →
cache13–60.0112%18 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0014%17 Sept →
mirage13–90.0316%17 Sept →
cache11–130.006%17 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.085%16 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0610%16 Sept →
dust213–10.040%16 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.105%16 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.043%14 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.068%14 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0218%10 Sept →
vertigo10–30.099%10 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0615%10 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.018%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.018%9 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0417%9 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0611%9 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0516%8 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0714%8 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0113%8 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0815%7 Sept →
mirage13–100.0011%7 Sept →
nuke9–130.0215%7 Sept →
inferno8–130.0412%7 Sept →
mirage13–90.0315%6 Sept →
nuke10–130.0123%6 Sept →
dust27–130.0310%6 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0514%5 Sept →
cache13–8-0.040%5 Sept →
mirage5–130.0113%5 Sept →
nuke6–130.0411%4 Sept →
mirage11–130.0121%4 Sept →
office13–70.0116%4 Sept →
office13–10.019%4 Sept →
shelter1–13-0.127%4 Sept →
nuke2–00.0210%4 Sept →
dust26–130.0111%4 Sept →
dust213–70.0426%2 Sept →
nuke13–90.0616%2 Sept →
ancient7–130.0517%1 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0317%1 Sept →
dust213–20.0316%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0410%31 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0426%31 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0321%30 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0524%29 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0414%29 Aug →
overpass12–12-0.0313%29 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.