mercilessgsg — CS2 Stats

76561198427611475[U:1:467345747]

1,895Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,799Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,501Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3553 of 33421 tracked

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,873), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Red band median
Headshot rate	55.5%	49.9%
Shot accuracy	10.3%	13.4%
Kill/death ratio	1.10	1.12
Match win rate	44.8%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning46

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateWWWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.2

Aggression5.5

Utility4.9

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning4.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time564ms−85ms

first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms

Headshot accuracy34.2%−1.5%

first ⅓ avg 35.8% → last ⅓ avg 34.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

W4Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 42% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	11–15	42%	0.01
dust2	A	19	12–7	63%	0.05
ancient	S	14	10–4	71%	0.02
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	0.03
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	0.06
inferno	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	0.04
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

99,122Lifetime kills

1.10K/D

4,267Matches

44.8%Match win rate

55.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Red band

10.3%Shot accuracy

12,375MVPs

2,533Hours (in match)

2,037Bombs planted

1,814Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,053

AWP18,034

M4A4 / M4A1-S11,967

Desert Eagle10,762

P2000 / USP-S5,442

Glock-183,454

P2501,635

SSG 081,462

Galil AR1,266

Knife1,220

Lifetime map wins

6,942inferno

5,937dust2

2,927nuke

1,030vertigo

801train

345cbble

112office

88lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

566Matches

50%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

88.6ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	129	46%	1.29	18.3
Inferno	81	59%	1.38	18.2
Ancient	77	51%	1.27	18.7
Anubis	36	56%	1.29	18.9
Dust2	22	45%	1.01	14.6
Overpass	20	50%	1.30	19.0
Nuke	17	47%	1.53	20.8
Cache	8	38%	1.07	18.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

34.0%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

89.0%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

560msReaction time

29.9%T opening success

48.4%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

12.87HE damage / grenade

3.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.858 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.9287% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–7	-0.03	25%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.06	24%	28 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.12	48%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.18	46%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	35%	26 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	39%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.06	38%	25 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	33%	25 Aug →
cache	19–17	-0.01	19%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	17%	20 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	24%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.06	59%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.22	44%	18 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.02	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	21%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	44%	16 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	37%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	41%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.04	46%	16 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	24%	16 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.03	41%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.16	68%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	47%	14 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	38%	14 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.10	11%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.10	33%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.03	26%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	35%	11 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.14	8%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	38%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.04	32%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.09	39%	8 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.10	38%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.14	25%	8 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	50%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	53%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.10	52%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.11	33%	7 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	26%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	45%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	50%	5 Aug →
ancient	19–16	0.02	24%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.07	39%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	24%	4 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	33%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	28%	3 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.05	29%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	41%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	24%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	42%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	44%	1 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.05	36%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	56%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	39%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	20%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	34%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.06	57%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.09	37%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	32%	30 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	33%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.01	32%	30 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	31%	29 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	39%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	36%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.14	58%	29 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	35%	28 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.08	34%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	31%	28 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.03	31%	28 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.02	37%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.04	38%	26 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.03	37%	25 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.05	59%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.08	23%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.16	34%	25 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.11	50%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	39%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	40%	25 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.07	46%	25 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.00	33%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	27%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	38%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.04	30%	22 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	29%	20 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	30%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.13	39%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	25%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	63%	18 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	32%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.11	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	48%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	47%	18 Jul →
boulder	1–13	-0.04	35%	17 Jul →
train	13–11	0.06	32%	17 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	0.00	30%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.11	36%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	33%	17 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	34%	17 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	22%	16 Jul →