哈爾移動肥佬

哈爾移動肥佬 — CS2 Stats

76561198096935436[U:1:136669708]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,805Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,653Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,446Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#56095 of 221238 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 3 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,446 +1,196 3 Jun16 Sept · 5 days played
19,76221,446peak 21,4463 Jun16 Sept
21,446Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-06-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,446
  • +1,684 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,554 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1013−3
Win rate60%54%+6pp
K/D1.280.90+0.38
Headshot %55%59%−4pp

Measured 12 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate50.4%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy15.9%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.051.060.06 short
Match win rate53.5%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG哈爾移動肥佬FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,446 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning41
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY444610Last 10044%Win rateLLLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility2.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.1
Utility2.4
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact6.9

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time591ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 18 Jul
60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 19 Jun
328msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 16 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 13ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C48202842%0.00
mirageA138562%0.01
ancientD124833%-0.02
anubisD93633%-0.01
cacheD62433%-0.02
nukeA53260%0.01
inferno32167%-0.01
vertigo21150%0.01
train21150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,115Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
6,484Matches
53.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
50.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
15,725MVPs
2,762Hours (in match)
5,550Bombs planted
1,355Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4744,644
AWP6,482
MP93,300
FAMAS2,232
P2501,961
Knife1,906

Lifetime map wins

52,810dust2
3,582inferno
2,250vertigo
1,089nuke
708train
549office
229italy
193dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

639Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.7ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23672%1.3518.1
Ancient2952%0.9414.2
Inferno1540%0.9716.3
Anubis1354%0.9216.5
Vertigo1242%1.2619.4
Mirage1145%0.7913.6
Nuke20%0.589.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.4%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
594msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
34.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
4.61HE damage / grenade
3.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4742 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.4948% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0429%16 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0219%16 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0531%16 Sept
dust216–14-0.0618%16 Sept
nuke13–70.0325%15 Sept
mirage13–110.0930%15 Sept
dust25–130.0326%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0717%10 Sept
dust211–13-0.1017%10 Sept
dust213–7-0.0817%8 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0223%8 Sept
cache6–13-0.058%8 Sept
inferno7–2-0.0620%8 Sept
nuke13–30.0124%8 Sept
vertigo6–130.0624%8 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0228%8 Sept
dust213–80.0011%7 Sept
mirage13–00.0429%5 Sept
dust213–30.0922%5 Sept
dust213–10-0.0025%3 Sept
mirage13–40.0320%3 Sept
dust212–12-0.0816%3 Sept
dust22–13-0.0622%3 Sept
cache13–110.0224%2 Sept
mirage7–130.0226%2 Sept
dust212–120.0819%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0513%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.0227%25 Aug
ancient5–130.0017%25 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0516%24 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0514%24 Aug
dust212–120.0221%24 Aug
dust213–60.0618%24 Aug
ancient12–120.0219%22 Aug
anubis11–130.0719%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0719%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0420%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0121%22 Aug
ancient13–100.0314%19 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0414%19 Aug
ancient13–100.0722%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0716%17 Aug
dust213–60.0419%17 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0016%17 Aug
dust213–50.1124%16 Aug
train13–110.0830%16 Aug
dust213–80.0915%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0127%10 Aug
dust210–130.0015%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.0638%10 Aug
dust21–13-0.1025%10 Aug
dust213–9-0.0815%10 Aug
dust26–13-0.0320%10 Aug
dust28–130.0120%9 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0214%9 Aug
dust213–60.0420%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0244%9 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0518%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0537%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0427%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0826%8 Aug
inferno13–60.0318%8 Aug
dust213–80.0121%8 Aug
cache12–120.0742%8 Aug
dust213–30.1224%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0518%8 Aug
nuke15–150.0127%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0318%3 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0023%3 Aug
dust210–130.0020%2 Aug
train4–13-0.0028%2 Aug
dust213–80.0121%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0123%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0222%1 Aug
dust211–130.0316%1 Aug
dust213–100.0631%18 Jul
dust210–30.0120%18 Jul
dust213–70.1438%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0526%17 Jul
anubis13–90.0627%17 Jul
dust210–130.0224%17 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0431%9 Jul
dust26–130.0340%9 Jul
dust215–150.0118%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0435%27 Jun
dust26–130.0135%27 Jun
anubis9–130.0414%27 Jun
dust25–13-0.0626%26 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0428%26 Jun
anubis13–1-0.094%26 Jun
nuke13–50.0724%26 Jun
dust25–13-0.0232%26 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0760%19 Jun
dust213–11-0.0424%19 Jun
cache13–10-0.0216%19 Jun
vertigo13–4-0.0318%6 Jun
cache4–13-0.1215%6 Jun
dust213–100.0226%6 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0924%3 Jun
inferno7–130.0120%3 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →