Zorrahh

Zorrahh — CS2 Stats

US76561198096443301[U:1:136177573]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,443Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,356Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19571 of 228269 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,443 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 27 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +1,628 28 Jan18 Sept · 19 days played
20,48225,917peak 25,91728 Jan18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,890 +0 28 Aug18 Sept · 3 observations
1,8901,890peak 1,89028 Aug18 Sept
26,051Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,890Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,890
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 917 below peak (25,917)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,855), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate52.4%49.2%50.2%above
Shot accuracy16.5%13.3%11.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.841.121.180.34 short
Match win rate47.2%48.5%51.9%4.7% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZorrahhPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,890csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning51
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43543Last 10043%Win rateWLTWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −7.0pp headshot accuracy · −92ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time635ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 10–13 · vertigo, 7 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 28 Jul
430msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 8 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 12ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28131546%-0.01
infernoC1881044%0.00
ancientC135838%0.01
dust2B126650%-0.03
anubisC94544%-0.02
nukeB63350%-0.03
vertigoC52340%0.06
overpass31233%-0.01
cache3030%-0.02
office2020%-0.05
poseidon110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,792Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
7,759Matches
47.2%Match win rate
52.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Red band
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Red band
21,922MVPs
4,316Hours (in match)
3,079Bombs planted
1,922Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,426
AWP10,512
Knife2,158
FAMAS2,135
MP92,120

Lifetime map wins

16,185inferno
5,697vertigo
5,309dust2
4,252train
3,605nuke
3,540cbble
1,607office
126lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,724Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
80.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19451%1.0216.1
Anubis10444%1.0015.9
Ancient10444%0.9915.9
Vertigo8359%1.1617.4
Inferno5742%0.9915.3
Dust24743%0.8414.0
Nuke3557%0.9814.8
Overpass1953%0.9815.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.4%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
649msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
8.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4422 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0359% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–6-0.0815%8 Sept
inferno7–9-0.1713%8 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0022%8 Sept
overpass9–60.0520%8 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0320%2 Sept
inferno3–9-0.0625%22 Aug
vertigo13–50.0121%10 Aug
ancient13–110.0514%10 Aug
dust25–13-0.0418%10 Aug
ancient13–100.0733%7 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0421%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0221%7 Aug
vertigo10–130.1540%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0323%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0025%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0318%4 Aug
vertigo10–130.1134%4 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0926%3 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0435%3 Aug
mirage13–30.0127%28 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0232%28 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0222%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0514%28 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0524%28 Jul
cache1–130.0467%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0430%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0321%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0626%25 Jul
dust213–110.0221%25 Jul
ancient13–00.000%25 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0123%25 Jul
dust211–13-0.0629%25 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0244%25 Jul
ancient5–130.0135%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0511%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0129%21 Jul
cache15–15-0.0621%21 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0829%21 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0318%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.1024%21 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0425%19 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0738%19 Jul
inferno8–80.0435%19 Jul
inferno13–70.0125%26 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0716%22 May
nuke11–13-0.0419%29 Apr
ancient13–110.0026%29 Apr
overpass13–16-0.0719%25 Apr
dust27–130.0118%19 Apr
office1–13-0.0222%15 Apr
ancient11–130.0318%11 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0323%11 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0318%8 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0312%8 Apr
vertigo9–50.0621%19 Mar
inferno3–90.1043%10 Mar
dust213–7-0.0217%5 Mar
anubis10–130.0814%2 Mar
mirage11–130.0121%2 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0119%2 Mar
office0–8-0.0830%1 Mar
ancient10–130.0316%1 Mar
mirage11–130.0418%1 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0511%25 Feb
dust217–19-0.0530%25 Feb
inferno13–40.0822%25 Feb
mirage13–80.0218%24 Feb
ancient10–13-0.058%18 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0613%18 Feb
poseidon9–60.0220%15 Feb
nuke7–9-0.0313%15 Feb
inferno9–40.1031%15 Feb
mirage13–90.0424%12 Feb
mirage5–130.0335%12 Feb
dust25–13-0.0533%11 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0218%11 Feb
dust213–6-0.044%11 Feb
mirage11–30.0221%11 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0616%10 Feb
anubis1–130.0516%10 Feb
dust29–13-0.0614%10 Feb
dust213–60.0626%10 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0122%9 Feb
mirage13–80.0229%9 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0016%9 Feb
mirage13–110.0321%5 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0119%3 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0625%3 Feb
inferno8–130.0119%2 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0022%2 Feb
dust213–40.0320%2 Feb
ancient13–70.0013%2 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0314%1 Feb
inferno13–70.1019%1 Feb
ancient10–130.0414%1 Feb
inferno13–100.0023%1 Feb
inferno13–40.1311%29 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0222%28 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0315%28 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0426%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →