Դավ

Դավ — CS2 Stats

RU76561198094381664[U:1:134115936]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,347Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,466Purple band · top ~14.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95518 of 230915 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,347 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 13 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,466 -1,086 14 Dec19 Sept · 5 days played
18,46621,555peak 21,55514 Dec19 Sept
21,555Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2025-11-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,089 below peak (21,555)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,534 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGԴավFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,466 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning46
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42499Last 10042%Win rateLLLWWTLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 725ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility5.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time650ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · palacio, 6 Dec
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 20 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · inferno, 9 Jan
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 13 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 7overpassWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC145936%-0.01
infernoC145936%-0.02
cacheC135838%-0.01
anubisC104640%-0.01
overpassD93633%0.02
ancientC83538%-0.02
trainB84450%0.02
dust2A74357%0.00
vertigoB63350%-0.03
nuke41325%-0.03
office43175%0.04
palacio220100%0.06
stronghold1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

68Matches
59%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient560%1.0617.6
Mirage560%0.9818.0
Overpass10%0.6210.0
Anubis10%0.335.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
13.1°Preaim
655msReaction time
23.0%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
7.00HE damage / grenade
12.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.0573° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4877 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0518%4 Jul
cache7–13-0.0310%4 Jul
cache9–13-0.0523%4 Jul
cache13–11-0.018%26 Jun
dust213–60.0414%26 Jun
cache12–12-0.0113%30 May
anubis9–13-0.0425%29 May
anubis13–90.0413%29 May
cache13–7-0.0123%26 May
cache4–130.0124%26 May
cache13–3-0.0211%25 May
cache6–13-0.054%25 May
cache13–11-0.0112%7 May
cache12–12-0.0620%7 May
cache11–130.0236%7 May
cache13–60.0810%3 May
mirage3–13-0.0618%2 May
mirage13–110.0313%2 May
ancient10–13-0.0418%2 May
train9–13-0.0322%24 Apr
train13–80.0736%23 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0520%22 Apr
dust26–13-0.0411%22 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0323%20 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0621%15 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0516%12 Apr
anubis11–13-0.075%12 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0924%10 Apr
mirage13–110.0015%10 Apr
mirage13–50.0033%9 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0222%6 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0517%3 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0429%3 Apr
ancient14–160.0120%1 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0215%1 Apr
inferno3–9-0.1232%27 Mar
stronghold12–120.0226%27 Mar
nuke12–120.0223%26 Mar
train10–13-0.0424%25 Mar
ancient13–80.0015%20 Mar
mirage16–12-0.0116%20 Mar
dust29–130.0141%20 Mar
overpass13–60.0321%14 Mar
overpass10–130.0424%14 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0023%13 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0219%13 Mar
inferno9–70.0118%9 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0217%8 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0322%8 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0320%1 Mar
overpass13–60.0831%1 Mar
train13–90.0725%28 Feb
train13–50.0730%28 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0416%27 Feb
ancient13–100.0518%22 Feb
dust213–110.0028%21 Feb
vertigo1–13-0.016%13 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0810%6 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0415%1 Feb
office13–90.0426%22 Jan
office13–60.0925%22 Jan
inferno9–70.1221%14 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0213%14 Jan
overpass12–120.0320%14 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0517%14 Jan
inferno9–50.0415%9 Jan
inferno9–50.0117%9 Jan
nuke11–130.0221%9 Jan
palacio13–80.0025%9 Jan
vertigo3–70.0428%9 Jan
vertigo6–9-0.1814%3 Jan
inferno3–9-0.0713%3 Jan
inferno9–20.0518%3 Jan
train10–130.0413%3 Jan
train2–13-0.0323%3 Jan
train10–8-0.0321%3 Jan
vertigo13–7-0.0214%22 Dec
vertigo13–8-0.039%17 Dec
dust213–7-0.0023%14 Dec
anubis13–20.0223%13 Dec
anubis13–7-0.0215%10 Dec
anubis13–70.0425%10 Dec
palacio13–60.1222%6 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0421%6 Dec
mirage3–80.0820%6 Dec
nuke13–9-0.0521%4 Dec
inferno9–130.0523%4 Dec
anubis8–13-0.0311%4 Dec
mirage1–7-0.068%4 Dec
vertigo9–50.0524%26 Nov
inferno12–120.0119%26 Nov
office13–60.0411%26 Nov
office6–130.0011%26 Nov
inferno7–9-0.0929%20 Nov
inferno5–9-0.237%20 Nov
overpass8–130.0918%19 Nov
overpass10–13-0.037%19 Nov
anubis12–120.009%16 Nov
dust22–130.0220%14 Nov
dust213–10-0.0223%13 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →