Larry Lercuck — CS2 Stats

MC76561198094018921[U:1:133753193]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,435Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,486Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,436Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9998 of 50401 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,436Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 23,436
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,564 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	63.0%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	18.7%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	0.86	1.08
Match win rate	46.3%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning46

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–47–12Last 10041%Win rateLLLWWLTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression4.4

Utility5.5

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels0.9

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning4.6

Utility5.5

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact8.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time596ms−52ms

first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–8

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 29% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	25	12–13	48%	0.01
mirage	D	21	6–15	29%	0.01
inferno	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.00
dust2	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.03
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.03
vertigo	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.05
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

279,455Lifetime kills

0.86K/D

5,636Matches

46.3%Match win rate

63.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players

18.7%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 10 players

12,805MVPs

17,051Hours (in match)

8,785Bombs planted

2,012Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47147,135

AWP31,023

M4A4 / M4A1-S29,376

P2000 / USP-S26,354

Desert Eagle12,230

Glock-184,662

SSG 082,826

Knife2,725

Galil AR2,510

P2502,217

Lifetime map wins

12,145inferno

11,387dust2

3,553train

3,520nuke

2,297cbble

2,205vertigo

567office

188lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

998Matches

53%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

—ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

77.5%Counter-strafing

11.2°Preaim

598msReaction time

24.7%T opening success

42.8%CT opening success

0.81Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

6.50HE damage / grenade

7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.7296% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	7–13	-0.10	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	21%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	10%	23 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	11%	23 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	13%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	23%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	39%	21 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	14%	20 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.08	25%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.01	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	29%	1 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.00	5%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	42%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.08	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	14%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	33%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	22%	12 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	22%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	19%	4 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.00	32%	4 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.03	19%	4 Jul →
overpass	8–13	-0.02	17%	4 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	6%	4 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	25%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.12	23%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	18%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	16%	4 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	22%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	31%	4 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.11	14%	4 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.07	15%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	21%	27 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	18%	27 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.03	19%	27 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	16%	23 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	15%	23 Jun →
inferno	5–13	0.01	11%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.08	33%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–3	-0.02	9%	14 Jun →
inferno	9–3	0.09	0%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.07	8%	12 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.10	21%	7 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.03	26%	6 Jun →
mirage	12–12	-0.05	24%	6 Jun →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	18%	6 Jun →
dust2	3–6	-0.16	0%	31 May →
dust2	13–1	-0.06	0%	31 May →
nuke	14–16	0.01	13%	30 May →
inferno	13–5	0.02	16%	30 May →
dust2	12–12	-0.00	20%	30 May →
vertigo	9–13	-0.05	11%	30 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	18%	29 May →
cache	13–1	0.02	39%	29 May →
mirage	8–13	0.04	16%	27 May →
cache	13–6	-0.01	14%	27 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	31%	27 May →
nuke	13–9	0.01	16%	27 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	16%	27 May →
mirage	13–10	0.01	20%	27 May →
inferno	8–8	0.03	24%	26 May →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	33%	24 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	22%	24 May →
dust2	13–6	0.01	13%	24 May →
cache	3–13	0.04	60%	23 May →
cache	13–8	0.07	16%	23 May →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	11%	22 May →
office	13–3	-0.01	21%	22 May →
vertigo	12–12	0.02	25%	21 May →
dust2	3–1	0.05	13%	21 May →
train	8–13	-0.03	19%	20 May →
cache	13–8	0.13	34%	10 May →
mirage	4–13	0.02	27%	10 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	33%	9 May →
overpass	13–11	-0.09	9%	9 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	16%	9 May →
ancient	13–2	0.03	24%	8 May →
mirage	13–5	0.04	13%	8 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	13%	8 May →
inferno	9–13	0.03	18%	4 May →
cache	13–6	0.11	24%	4 May →
cache	8–1	0.08	50%	4 May →
cache	12–12	-0.05	33%	4 May →
cache	6–13	0.05	24%	3 May →
mirage	6–13	0.04	19%	3 May →
cache	10–13	-0.06	19%	3 May →
cache	6–13	-0.07	19%	2 May →
cache	6–13	0.01	33%	2 May →
cache	4–13	-0.02	27%	2 May →
cache	4–13	-0.06	32%	1 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	25%	1 May →
cache	13–2	0.12	27%	1 May →
cache	7–13	0.02	23%	1 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	11%	25 Apr →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	8%	25 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.02	14%	22 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.08	20%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	21%	21 Apr →