iwrestledabearonce

iwrestledabearonce — CS2 Stats

CH76561198093128109[U:1:132862381]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

663Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,332Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,139Purple band · top ~23.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,139 +566 7 Sept – 9 Oct · 24 days played
15,46317,952peak 17,9527 Sept9 Oct
18,313Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-07-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,813 below peak (17,952)
  • +676 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,861 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate40.7%44.8%45.7%5.0% short
Shot accuracy19.4%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.031.05meets
Match win rate39.9%45.2%45.7%5.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGiwrestledabearonceFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,139 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning52
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.2
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time558ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 23 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · anubis, 5 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 8 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 13ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%-0.01
dust2A2011–955%-0.01
cacheA1610–663%-0.02
infernoS139–469%0.01
anubisC114–736%-0.01
nukeA95–456%0.03
ancientD72–529%0.00
poseidon—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

158,737Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5,807Matches
39.9%Match win rate
40.7%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players
13,404MVPs
2,750Hours (in match)
3,973Bombs planted
1,187Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,501
AWP33,471
P2503,996
FAMAS2,895
Knife2,668
UMP-452,644

Lifetime map wins

14,141dust2
8,477inferno
3,342nuke
1,387train
1,322cbble
603vertigo
279office
109lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

906Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
85.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
4%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1765%1.0615.7
Anubis1650%0.9915.5
Ancient1362%1.1016.5
Mirage1338%0.9214.7
Vertigo850%0.8814.3
Dust2743%1.0414.7
Overpass560%0.749.6
Nuke3100%1.3217.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
553msReaction time
62.7%T opening success
29.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
12.09HE damage / grenade
17.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.4272% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0112%12 Oct →
cache16–130.0217%11 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0516%11 Oct →
inferno16–130.0213%11 Oct →
anubis13–20.0715%11 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0124%11 Oct →
inferno13–80.0513%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0110%10 Oct →
dust213–160.0015%9 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0417%9 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0717%9 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0717%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0111%9 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0114%8 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0414%7 Oct →
anubis7–130.0116%7 Oct →
cache13–9-0.018%7 Oct →
inferno13–60.0023%6 Oct →
dust210–130.0216%5 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0319%4 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0918%4 Oct →
anubis10–130.0119%4 Oct →
cache13–80.0113%4 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0023%3 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0514%3 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0117%3 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0622%3 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0714%1 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0418%1 Oct →
inferno9–130.0532%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.0316%29 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0328%29 Sept →
nuke13–30.0417%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0423%29 Sept →
cache13–110.0330%29 Sept →
dust211–130.0120%27 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0231%26 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0116%26 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0319%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0511%26 Sept →
inferno9–130.0517%25 Sept →
ancient13–00.1441%23 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0811%22 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0225%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0321%22 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0022%21 Sept →
mirage5–130.0524%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0315%20 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0235%20 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0134%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.1125%19 Sept →
cache10–130.0323%19 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0915%19 Sept →
dust213–80.0518%18 Sept →
mirage3–130.0335%18 Sept →
nuke13–20.0122%16 Sept →
nuke13–40.0439%15 Sept →
inferno13–90.0025%13 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0221%11 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0121%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0714%11 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0217%11 Sept →
dust213–60.049%11 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0813%11 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0521%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0129%7 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0120%7 Sept →
mirage15–150.0216%6 Sept →
ancient7–130.0518%6 Sept →
dust24–130.0217%6 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0530%5 Sept →
anubis13–110.0717%5 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.009%5 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0542%5 Sept →
dust20–8-0.0417%5 Sept →
dust213–110.0218%5 Sept →
nuke6–130.0520%5 Sept →
inferno13–60.0715%4 Sept →
nuke13–20.1025%4 Sept →
mirage7–130.0218%4 Sept →
mirage13–50.0441%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0130%4 Sept →
mirage16–120.0421%2 Sept →
mirage13–00.0719%31 Aug →
cache9–130.0010%30 Aug →
poseidon7–9-0.0112%30 Aug →
mirage9–130.0521%30 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0214%30 Aug →
mirage13–100.0115%27 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0730%6 Aug →
cache3–13-0.1310%3 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.088%3 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0436%2 Aug →
mirage11–130.0010%28 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0222%28 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0521%26 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0525%19 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0232%18 Jul →
cache13–1-0.0038%18 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0227%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.