keek

keek — CS2 Stats

DE76561198089869461[U:1:129603733]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,412Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,432Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#59548 of 238649 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,814 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 20 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,432 -312 24 Aug22 Sept · 18 days played
20,93522,539peak 22,53924 Aug22 Sept
22,836Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,814Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,814
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 187 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,107 below peak (22,539)
  • -312 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,568 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkeekFACEITLevel 9 · 1,814 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,432 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,814csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning69
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateWLWWWWTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −82ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.5
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time595ms+42ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 9 Sept
46%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 3 Sept
383msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 9 Sept
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 26 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA22121055%0.00
ancientA1810856%-0.01
nukeB158753%0.02
dust2D1531220%0.00
cacheA148657%0.02
anubisS118373%-0.01
mirageD51420%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

403Matches
53%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
76.0ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7453%1.0615.2
Inferno6255%0.9915.6
Anubis5953%0.9415.1
Dust23850%1.1616.0
Nuke3450%1.1015.4
Cache2458%1.2017.0
Mirage1155%0.8616.4
Vertigo333%0.669.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
583msReaction time
67.7%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
7.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.794% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0430%23 Sept
nuke11–130.0221%22 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0225%22 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0121%22 Sept
dust213–80.0026%22 Sept
ancient13–110.0220%22 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0318%21 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0126%21 Sept
cache13–20.1017%21 Sept
ancient6–13-0.046%21 Sept
dust210–13-0.0020%21 Sept
nuke6–30.0418%21 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0122%17 Sept
inferno11–130.0425%17 Sept
cache13–80.0121%17 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0314%17 Sept
inferno16–130.0121%16 Sept
ancient13–40.1121%16 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0423%16 Sept
dust29–13-0.0822%16 Sept
cache8–13-0.0321%15 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0124%15 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0123%14 Sept
dust26–13-0.0629%14 Sept
nuke10–130.0221%14 Sept
cache16–140.0631%14 Sept
dust213–20.0816%13 Sept
nuke13–60.0635%11 Sept
inferno13–70.0325%11 Sept
anubis15–190.0024%11 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0113%11 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0726%11 Sept
inferno7–130.0228%11 Sept
nuke13–100.0113%10 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0720%10 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0615%10 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0523%10 Sept
dust26–130.0328%10 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0817%9 Sept
inferno13–100.0535%9 Sept
inferno13–10.0939%9 Sept
nuke13–30.1245%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.0617%9 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0113%8 Sept
dust27–13-0.0430%8 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0220%8 Sept
anubis14–160.0110%8 Sept
cache13–160.0125%8 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0521%8 Sept
cache14–16-0.0119%7 Sept
inferno13–110.0422%7 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0321%7 Sept
inferno11–130.0737%7 Sept
anubis13–90.0129%7 Sept
cache13–60.0727%7 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0823%7 Sept
cache13–90.0127%7 Sept
dust27–130.0533%6 Sept
cache4–13-0.0138%6 Sept
mirage1–10-0.0715%5 Sept
anubis13–40.0222%5 Sept
inferno13–40.0129%5 Sept
ancient13–60.0318%5 Sept
dust216–19-0.0031%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0646%3 Sept
inferno13–60.0428%3 Sept
cache8–130.1020%3 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0310%2 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0914%2 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0518%1 Sept
ancient10–130.0022%1 Sept
dust210–130.0236%30 Aug
inferno13–90.0236%30 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0222%30 Aug
cache13–6-0.0315%30 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0823%30 Aug
nuke13–50.0118%30 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0121%30 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0119%30 Aug
nuke7–130.0242%29 Aug
dust27–130.1124%29 Aug
nuke8–130.0120%28 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0530%27 Aug
ancient13–100.0521%27 Aug
anubis13–00.0243%26 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0321%26 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0117%26 Aug
dust213–30.0220%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0425%25 Aug
ancient4–130.0111%25 Aug
cache13–10-0.0321%25 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0031%25 Aug
nuke13–10.0521%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0022%25 Aug
nuke13–80.0211%24 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0210%24 Aug
inferno13–50.0520%22 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0618%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0337%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0124%20 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →