-bot-

-bot- — CS2 Stats

76561197970532881[U:1:10267153]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,884Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,441Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,462Top 10% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16445 of 239293 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 26 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,462 +445 26 Apr23 Sept · 14 days played
25,01726,812peak 26,81226 Apr23 Sept
26,812Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-04-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,350 below peak (26,812)
  • -815 over 30 days · declining
  • -347 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,538 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches32
Win rate22%
K/D3.29
Headshot %82%

Measured 28 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,804), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate60.7%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy12.1%13.2%13.7%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.071.09above
Match win rate30.6%46.9%48.4%17.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-bot-FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,462 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning61
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateTLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time575ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 29.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 10 Jun
57%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 11 Jun
344msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 11 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 26 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC23101343%0.01
cacheA2214864%0.03
infernoC1971237%0.01
dust2C146843%0.02
anubisB137654%0.01
nukeS96367%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

195,187Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,422Matches
30.6%Match win rate
60.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
12.1%Shot accuracy
14,087MVPs
2,720Hours (in match)
7,795Bombs planted
1,428Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4776,717
AWP6,549
MP95,634
P2504,059

Lifetime map wins

14,669dust2
7,044inferno
6,557nuke
848cbble
566train
460vertigo
296aztec
265office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
61%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
79.3ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4963%1.3517.0
Anubis4154%1.1016.0
Inferno3456%1.2715.7
Nuke2268%1.4317.5
Dust21953%1.1818.0
Cache1070%1.3115.4
Overpass2100%1.5619.0
Mirage10%1.0013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
569msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
62.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
11.54HE damage / grenade
9.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.7383% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke15–150.0734%21 Sept
ancient11–130.0341%21 Sept
cache13–20.0935%21 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0130%21 Sept
ancient13–100.0124%8 Sept
anubis14–160.0217%8 Sept
dust216–19-0.0231%3 Sept
inferno11–130.0635%3 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0330%3 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0316%2 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0620%2 Sept
anubis13–90.0725%1 Sept
ancient10–130.0333%1 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0221%30 Aug
nuke13–50.0622%30 Aug
anubis13–00.0623%26 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0112%26 Aug
anubis13–80.0425%26 Aug
cache9–130.0420%25 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0528%25 Aug
cache13–10-0.0111%25 Aug
ancient13–70.1224%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0123%20 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0214%20 Aug
dust214–16-0.0324%18 Aug
cache13–11-0.0226%18 Aug
inferno13–100.0119%18 Aug
anubis18–22-0.0417%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.0132%16 Aug
inferno13–100.0335%16 Aug
ancient13–70.0717%14 Aug
cache13–60.0620%14 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0015%14 Aug
ancient13–60.0530%11 Aug
nuke13–40.0915%11 Aug
ancient13–30.0239%11 Aug
cache13–7-0.0131%11 Aug
cache13–40.1036%11 Aug
cache3–13-0.0324%10 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0631%10 Aug
cache13–100.0329%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0124%9 Aug
cache13–90.0323%9 Aug
inferno12–160.0320%9 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0015%9 Aug
ancient8–130.0727%31 Jul
inferno10–130.0150%31 Jul
inferno9–6-0.0028%31 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0520%24 Jul
dust216–140.0129%24 Jul
cache13–40.1633%24 Jul
inferno13–60.0429%24 Jul
cache14–160.0130%24 Jul
inferno16–120.0619%21 Jul
cache16–140.0030%21 Jul
ancient7–130.0721%21 Jul
anubis4–130.0329%16 Jul
cache13–100.0931%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0216%16 Jul
nuke16–130.0621%15 Jul
cache7–13-0.0126%10 Jul
ancient13–70.0116%10 Jul
cache13–7-0.0224%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0416%9 Jul
dust213–30.0238%9 Jul
anubis13–70.0027%9 Jul
anubis13–80.0122%5 Jul
dust29–13-0.0125%5 Jul
nuke13–80.0433%4 Jul
dust211–130.0431%4 Jul
anubis8–130.0143%4 Jul
nuke9–130.0732%4 Jul
nuke13–50.0533%28 Jun
inferno11–130.0223%28 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0116%28 Jun
nuke10–130.0530%28 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0219%25 Jun
dust213–5-0.0227%25 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0428%25 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0820%25 Jun
ancient13–90.0622%21 Jun
dust213–90.0828%15 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0241%15 Jun
nuke13–100.0629%15 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0346%15 Jun
dust24–130.0657%11 Jun
cache12–120.0626%11 Jun
anubis5–130.0325%11 Jun
ancient9–130.0117%11 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0326%11 Jun
dust23–00.2056%11 Jun
cache11–13-0.0132%10 Jun
inferno12–120.1323%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0229%10 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0228%10 Jun
cache13–40.2032%10 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0134%10 Jun
cache13–10-0.0129%29 Apr
cache4–13-0.0326%29 Apr
dust24–13-0.0420%26 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →