piet2412

piet2412 — CS2 Stats

76561198089290891[U:1:129025163]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

333Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,417Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating18,904Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86786 of 220796 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 333 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 21 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,904 +3,548 21 Feb10 Sept · 44 days played
14,86019,999peak 19,99921 Feb10 Sept
20,679Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-02-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,095 below peak (19,999)
  • -981 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,176 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,096 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.8%42.7%43.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy17.7%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.070.991.02above
Match win rate61.6%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpiet2412FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,904 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning40
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49465Last 10049%Win rateLLLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+5.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility4.1
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch10.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.0
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time538ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 26 Mar
38%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · cache, 20 May
391msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 15 Jun
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 29 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2281436%-0.02
dust2A159660%-0.02
mirageC156940%-0.02
cacheA127558%-0.01
anubisA117464%-0.00
ancientD93633%-0.01
nukeA95456%-0.04
overpassA74357%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,846Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,673Matches
61.6%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 4 players
38.8%Headshot %
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
12,410MVPs
1,456Hours (in match)
2,305Bombs planted
814Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,827
AWP10,002
FAMAS3,822
P903,121
SSG 082,864

Lifetime map wins

7,748dust2
3,419inferno
1,520nuke
1,151cbble
1,072train
344vertigo
271office
192lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
44%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
87.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

75%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno633%1.0815.8
Mirage683%1.1315.3
Anubis475%1.2415.0
Ancient3100%1.6423.7
Dust2333%1.0724.0
Nuke1100%1.9019.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
564msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
33.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
9.12HE damage / grenade
3.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.9475% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4705 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5442% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0120%10 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0412%8 Sept
cache5–13-0.0410%5 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0624%5 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0518%4 Sept
cache13–100.0110%4 Sept
inferno2–130.007%4 Sept
inferno7–13-0.029%3 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0722%17 Aug
inferno10–130.0112%17 Aug
ancient14–160.0315%17 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0221%16 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0916%14 Aug
cache12–20.0012%14 Aug
nuke13–70.000%14 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0117%14 Aug
dust213–11-0.0312%14 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0713%13 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0614%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0014%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0614%13 Aug
cache16–140.0210%29 Jul
anubis13–100.0211%29 Jul
inferno16–140.0214%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0716%26 Jul
dust213–9-0.0416%26 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0213%24 Jul
dust216–12-0.0613%20 Jul
dust213–8-0.0312%19 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0411%27 Jun
dust26–13-0.1117%26 Jun
inferno13–160.0113%26 Jun
inferno11–13-0.068%26 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0010%26 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0122%24 Jun
dust213–8-0.0518%24 Jun
inferno13–80.0515%22 Jun
cache13–10-0.0613%15 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0513%15 Jun
cache12–12-0.0012%10 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0013%10 Jun
mirage13–40.0316%6 Jun
ancient10–130.0111%6 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0516%5 Jun
ancient13–30.0914%5 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0713%3 Jun
cache13–8-0.090%30 May
cache13–6-0.0223%30 May
nuke13–11-0.0714%30 May
anubis13–30.0335%27 May
cache13–50.0122%27 May
ancient6–13-0.0416%25 May
ancient6–13-0.0312%25 May
anubis13–6-0.055%25 May
inferno6–13-0.0514%25 May
ancient8–13-0.0315%21 May
cache5–13-0.0238%20 May
dust213–11-0.0521%14 May
overpass13–10-0.039%9 May
inferno10–13-0.0714%9 May
inferno8–13-0.0415%6 May
ancient13–10-0.0517%6 May
cache5–130.0014%5 May
dust210–130.028%4 May
cache8–130.0716%30 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0415%29 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0116%29 Apr
nuke13–40.0121%23 Apr
dust213–6-0.0720%23 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0514%23 Apr
inferno15–15-0.065%18 Apr
mirage7–130.0112%18 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0217%8 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0112%4 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0423%2 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0411%2 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0011%2 Apr
mirage13–20.0616%29 Mar
dust213–50.097%26 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0024%26 Mar
anubis13–80.0615%24 Mar
nuke10–13-0.009%19 Mar
overpass13–100.0425%19 Mar
dust213–60.0214%19 Mar
mirage9–13-0.058%19 Mar
nuke13–100.0217%15 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0817%11 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0113%11 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0510%11 Mar
dust212–120.0210%5 Mar
dust24–13-0.036%5 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0212%4 Mar
inferno8–130.0019%3 Mar
overpass13–30.0517%27 Feb
overpass2–13-0.072%25 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0117%25 Feb
anubis13–60.0414%25 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0011%25 Feb
overpass9–130.037%21 Feb
dust215–150.0512%21 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →