teun1s

teun1s — CS2 Stats

NL76561198255980540[U:1:295714812]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,506Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,127Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37026 of 222084 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 11 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,127 -5,499 12 Jun16 Sept · 29 days played
23,12728,986peak 28,98612 Jun16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,455 +0 30 Aug12 Sept · 5 observations
2,4552,455peak 2,45530 Aug12 Sept
28,986Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,455Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-06-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,455
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 45 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,859 below peak (28,986)
  • -1,221 over 30 days · declining
  • -4,860 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,873 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGteun1sPREMIER23,127 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,455csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD434710Last 10043%Win rateTLWTWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 212 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time523ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 6–13 · dust2, 26 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 17 Jul
266msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 17 Jul
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
62In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 53% over 17ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB26121446%0.01
infernoC2081240%0.01
nukeB179853%0.04
dust2B126650%0.03
ancientD113827%-0.00
anubisC52340%0.02
mirage41325%0.01
office21150%0.02
overpass110100%0.10
vertigo1010%-0.02
train1010%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,360Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
86.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8849%1.1716.9
Ancient6560%1.1016.4
Nuke4751%1.3018.6
Inferno4643%1.0617.3
Anubis3842%1.0716.4
Vertigo3743%1.2417.9
Overpass1771%1.1516.6
Train1573%1.3418.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
525msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.11HE damage / grenade
8.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3145% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–150.0119%16 Sept
ancient5–130.0218%15 Sept
nuke13–80.1116%15 Sept
cache12–120.0225%14 Sept
ancient13–30.0631%13 Sept
mirage9–130.0221%13 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0023%13 Sept
cache2–10-0.0533%12 Sept
cache13–60.0122%12 Sept
dust28–130.0221%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.0118%12 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0116%12 Sept
cache13–70.0625%7 Sept
nuke13–40.1118%7 Sept
nuke10–130.0017%7 Sept
ancient13–40.0422%7 Sept
cache5–130.0615%5 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0821%5 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0313%5 Sept
dust213–8-0.0318%2 Sept
cache13–40.0426%2 Sept
cache13–8-0.0321%1 Sept
inferno6–130.0116%30 Aug
cache8–10.0327%30 Aug
cache13–100.0215%22 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0114%21 Aug
nuke13–50.1138%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0313%20 Aug
cache3–13-0.0413%20 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0011%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0724%15 Aug
nuke15–150.0111%13 Aug
inferno13–110.0423%13 Aug
cache13–6-0.0236%7 Aug
inferno8–130.0021%6 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0126%3 Aug
anubis10–20.0525%3 Aug
dust213–80.0418%3 Aug
cache13–70.1122%1 Aug
inferno13–60.0512%31 Jul
anubis13–110.0116%30 Jul
dust213–70.0421%30 Jul
nuke13–70.1122%29 Jul
cache1–13-0.0118%29 Jul
cache10–130.0113%28 Jul
cache9–13-0.0021%24 Jul
inferno13–160.0013%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0527%23 Jul
nuke16–140.0215%20 Jul
cache13–30.0617%20 Jul
cache13–90.0324%20 Jul
dust213–110.0726%17 Jul
ancient9–130.0120%17 Jul
cache12–120.0221%17 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0050%17 Jul
cache13–20.0524%16 Jul
office12–120.0417%14 Jul
office13–3-0.0020%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.059%11 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0324%11 Jul
inferno7–130.0332%8 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0320%3 Jul
nuke6–130.0238%3 Jul
ancient13–110.0712%3 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0212%3 Jul
nuke13–70.0825%3 Jul
inferno6–30.0013%3 Jul
nuke7–130.0919%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0310%2 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0115%2 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0615%29 Jun
inferno13–90.0319%28 Jun
dust26–130.1525%26 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0320%26 Jun
ancient2–13-0.088%26 Jun
anubis11–130.0115%26 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0532%25 Jun
dust27–130.0113%25 Jun
dust210–130.0623%24 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0128%24 Jun
inferno13–90.0011%23 Jun
overpass13–40.1021%23 Jun
ancient9–130.0210%23 Jun
dust216–130.0418%23 Jun
dust211–3-0.0115%23 Jun
nuke13–80.017%22 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0320%18 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0416%17 Jun
inferno8–130.1229%17 Jun
nuke9–130.0321%15 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0219%15 Jun
cache12–120.0112%14 Jun
vertigo8–13-0.0228%14 Jun
anubis9–130.0124%13 Jun
cache12–120.0018%13 Jun
inferno15–150.0918%12 Jun
train3–130.0922%12 Jun
dust22–13-0.0433%12 Jun
mirage13–10.0913%11 Jun
cache13–100.0619%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →