xtal

xtal — CS2 Stats

TR76561198088097557[U:1:127831829]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,104Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,945Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 1,104
0.0ppWin rate · 34.5% → 34.5%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 20 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,110 -326 23 Jun6 Jul · 2 days played
18,11018,436peak 18,43623 Jun6 Jul
18,544Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-06-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,018), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate36.2%41.9%42.7%6.5% short
Shot accuracy8.0%12.2%11.2%3.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.870.981.000.12 short
Match win rate44.0%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxtalFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning38
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35605Last 10035%Win rateLWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.1
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning3.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time641ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 27 Jun
75%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 23 Jun
477msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 9 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 16anubisWeakest map · 9% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C23101343%-0.01
cacheB168850%-0.01
mirageC146843%-0.01
nukeD124833%-0.02
anubisD111109%-0.02
infernoD91811%0.02
ancientC52340%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.03
vertigo31233%-0.00
office2020%-0.02
train21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,033Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
4,072Matches
44.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
36.2%Headshot %
8.0%Shot accuracy
6,315MVPs
1,321Hours (in match)
2,321Bombs planted
703Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,826
AWP11,360
MP91,117
Knife917

Lifetime map wins

7,528dust2
3,641nuke
2,885inferno
1,503vertigo
715train
303office
56safehouse
50italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
48%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
72.7ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2446%0.8112.8
Inferno1354%0.9814.2
Nuke1145%0.8815.0
Anubis1155%0.9113.3
Ancient956%0.8813.2
Dust2875%0.9812.5
Vertigo30%0.5912.3
Train20%0.8215.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
628msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
6.08HE damage / grenade
6.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7669% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–90.0128%18 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0410%16 Sept
anubis7–130.0421%16 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0214%9 Sept
mirage4–0-0.0620%9 Sept
cache13–100.0118%9 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0226%5 Sept
dust213–4-0.0112%5 Sept
office11–13-0.0415%5 Sept
office5–130.0111%5 Sept
mirage3–13-0.057%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0823%28 Aug
dust25–13-0.049%28 Aug
cache8–13-0.0721%26 Aug
cache10–13-0.0214%26 Aug
dust213–8-0.0333%25 Aug
nuke10–130.0223%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0020%25 Aug
dust24–13-0.0813%25 Aug
train13–70.0611%18 Aug
train10–13-0.0619%18 Aug
overpass6–9-0.088%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0023%1 Aug
dust212–120.0310%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0911%31 Jul
nuke13–100.0112%31 Jul
dust213–11-0.0311%29 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0313%29 Jul
vertigo13–100.0210%29 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0326%28 Jul
dust28–130.0119%28 Jul
anubis11–130.0317%27 Jul
mirage13–60.037%27 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0019%27 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0414%27 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0333%24 Jul
cache13–110.0117%24 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0113%24 Jul
dust213–110.0229%24 Jul
vertigo10–130.0119%18 Jul
mirage10–13-0.047%18 Jul
nuke7–1-0.1123%18 Jul
dust213–100.0547%18 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0018%18 Jul
cache1–13-0.0421%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.0318%18 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0611%16 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0226%16 Jul
cache11–13-0.054%16 Jul
nuke8–130.0013%16 Jul
dust28–130.0215%16 Jul
dust25–130.0210%15 Jul
inferno7–130.0617%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0224%9 Jul
cache13–1-0.059%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0410%9 Jul
dust213–90.0327%6 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0510%6 Jul
dust27–13-0.0615%6 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0010%6 Jul
inferno9–40.0818%4 Jul
cache13–8-0.0215%1 Jul
cache13–60.0117%1 Jul
cache13–70.089%1 Jul
nuke8–130.0012%30 Jun
inferno5–130.079%27 Jun
dust213–90.0811%27 Jun
anubis9–13-0.045%27 Jun
dust213–90.054%26 Jun
cache1–13-0.0314%26 Jun
nuke9–13-0.037%26 Jun
overpass13–70.0711%26 Jun
dust25–13-0.0615%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.0025%25 Jun
nuke5–13-0.055%24 Jun
cache13–110.0225%24 Jun
dust26–13-0.065%23 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0718%23 Jun
mirage13–20.0175%23 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0020%23 Jun
nuke13–70.0517%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0316%23 Jun
cache5–130.0120%23 Jun
cache4–13-0.019%23 Jun
anubis6–13-0.039%22 Jun
mirage9–130.0310%22 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0711%22 Jun
inferno8–130.0338%22 Jun
dust213–7-0.0325%22 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0614%22 Jun
dust213–9-0.0016%21 Jun
cache13–60.057%21 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0117%21 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0426%21 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0116%21 Jun
dust27–13-0.0318%21 Jun
ancient13–8-0.019%21 Jun
anubis2–130.037%20 Jun
inferno12–120.0715%20 Jun
mirage9–130.0114%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →