LdW

LdW — CS2 Stats

DE76561198087868474[U:1:127602746]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,340Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,761Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+3Tracked matches · now 3,340
−0.4ppWin rate · 44.8% → 44.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 31 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,662 +995 6 Feb5 Jul · 23 days played
23,27726,622peak 26,6226 Feb5 Jul
26,622Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-01-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.3%48.3%51.0%5.7% short
Shot accuracy14.2%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.09 short
Match win rate49.7%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLdWFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning61
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46477Last 10046%Win rateTTWTLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 113 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 253 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 893 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility3.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.1
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time575ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 4–13 · inferno, 25 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · nuke, 19 Feb
406msFastest reaction time · 3–1 · dust2, 13 Feb
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 26 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 51% over 35anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35181751%0.01
infernoB24111346%0.01
dust2C135838%-0.00
ancientB84450%0.01
overpassD72529%-0.03
anubisD51420%-0.01
cache43175%0.06
nuke21150%0.01
office1010%0.07
alpine110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

122,079Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
6,543Matches
49.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
45.3%Headshot %
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14,027MVPs
2,681Hours (in match)
8,140Bombs planted
1,416Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,997
AWP7,569
FAMAS2,436
MP92,203
P2501,885

Lifetime map wins

15,359inferno
8,632dust2
4,476nuke
1,432train
1,276vertigo
503cbble
153lake
149office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

793Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
81.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6356%1.0515.3
Anubis5852%0.9415.5
Ancient4360%0.9615.1
Vertigo2846%1.0116.1
Inferno2454%1.1714.5
Dust21560%0.9813.5
Overpass1145%1.1713.9
Nuke838%1.0215.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.9%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
578msReaction time
41.5%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
10.15HE damage / grenade
5.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.42 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office12–120.0712%9 Sept
dust212–120.0121%9 Sept
mirage13–50.0215%5 Sept
dust212–120.0330%1 Sept
inferno3–8-0.066%1 Sept
dust26–13-0.0526%1 Sept
cache8–13-0.0113%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.0932%31 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0418%31 Aug
mirage13–50.0333%31 Aug
dust213–100.0218%5 Jul
cache13–90.0526%28 Jun
cache13–30.0810%28 Jun
dust26–13-0.0129%28 Jun
mirage13–30.1121%27 Jun
inferno10–130.0022%27 Jun
inferno16–140.0222%26 Jun
anubis13–100.0118%26 Jun
inferno10–130.0215%26 Jun
mirage10–130.0323%26 Jun
inferno3–130.0424%25 Jun
inferno4–130.1219%25 Jun
cache13–70.1019%22 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0522%22 Jun
dust213–5-0.0213%10 Apr
nuke13–90.0233%8 Apr
inferno1–60.0228%7 Apr
ancient13–110.0325%7 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0719%26 Mar
dust25–13-0.0217%12 Mar
inferno13–110.0311%9 Mar
mirage13–40.1123%9 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0111%7 Mar
inferno13–110.0412%7 Mar
mirage10–130.0224%7 Mar
mirage13–50.1229%7 Mar
overpass13–100.039%7 Mar
dust216–120.0720%7 Mar
dust213–16-0.0113%3 Mar
alpine13–110.0322%3 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0017%1 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0420%1 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0223%1 Mar
mirage13–100.0917%26 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0618%26 Feb
inferno13–10.0325%26 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0313%26 Feb
mirage13–100.0222%24 Feb
overpass16–130.0115%24 Feb
anubis15–15-0.058%24 Feb
inferno16–140.0325%23 Feb
inferno13–90.0616%22 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0015%22 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0212%22 Feb
mirage13–100.0416%22 Feb
ancient13–4-0.0135%21 Feb
anubis1–6-0.0117%21 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0126%21 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0218%21 Feb
dust213–80.0422%21 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0216%21 Feb
mirage15–150.0313%21 Feb
inferno7–13-0.078%20 Feb
ancient13–160.0316%20 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0529%20 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0729%19 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0038%19 Feb
mirage7–130.0621%19 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0121%19 Feb
inferno13–40.0537%19 Feb
ancient13–20.1127%19 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0521%19 Feb
overpass7–13-0.1214%19 Feb
mirage13–110.0015%13 Feb
dust23–1-0.090%13 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0519%10 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0114%10 Feb
mirage13–80.016%9 Feb
mirage6–130.0217%9 Feb
mirage13–50.0021%9 Feb
mirage13–50.0131%8 Feb
overpass15–15-0.0315%8 Feb
mirage14–160.008%7 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0215%7 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0215%7 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0114%7 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0013%7 Feb
ancient13–100.0325%6 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0120%5 Feb
mirage7–130.052%5 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0217%5 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0217%5 Feb
inferno13–110.0210%3 Feb
inferno13–60.1014%3 Feb
mirage13–40.0521%2 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0012%2 Feb
dust27–130.0722%2 Feb
mirage13–80.0616%1 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0111%31 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0118%31 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →