goyb0b

goyb0b — CS2 Stats

US76561198087669630[U:1:127403902]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,242Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,833Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,414Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3866 of 222870 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,242 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 12 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,414 +146 30 Jul13 Sept · 9 days played
27,25127,639peak 27,63930 Jul13 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,334 +0 28 Aug13 Sept · 3 observations
1,3341,334peak 1,33428 Aug13 Sept
27,639Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,334Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,334
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 17 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 225 below peak (27,639)
  • +163 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,586 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,475), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate41.0%49.2%50.3%9.3% short
Shot accuracy11.9%13.4%11.5%above
Kill/death ratio0.931.121.180.25 short
Match win rate49.2%48.5%51.9%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgoyb0bPREMIER27,414 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,334csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning41
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD57394Last 10057%Win rateLTLWTTLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 122 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 343 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 794 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility4.0
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.1
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time568ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−6.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 26 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · cache, 19 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 7–3 · nuke, 16 Aug
13–0Biggest win · train, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 88% over 17anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1715288%-0.01
dust2B158753%-0.05
mirageD1551033%-0.04
infernoB115645%-0.02
trainS108280%-0.03
anubisD102820%-0.05
ancientA85363%-0.05
cacheS75271%-0.03
vertigoC52340%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.00
shelter110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,563Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
3,960Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Red band
41.0%Headshot %
11.9%Shot accuracy
8,382MVPs
1,833Hours (in match)
4,180Bombs planted
1,144Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,830
AWP7,447
P2501,490
FAMAS1,380
MP91,274

Lifetime map wins

10,517dust2
5,742inferno
5,258nuke
2,625train
1,240vertigo
424cbble
226office
41lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

211Matches
53%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
69.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5360%1.0513.4
Anubis4149%0.9312.9
Ancient2948%0.9314.3
Dust22454%0.9614.5
Inferno2352%1.0014.0
Nuke2065%0.8812.6
Vertigo1540%0.8613.1
Overpass250%0.6810.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
551msReaction time
19.4%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.64HE damage / grenade
7.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4585 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.358% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0920%12 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0315%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0413%10 Sept
train13–90.0116%9 Sept
mirage12–120.0213%9 Sept
dust212–12-0.0314%9 Sept
dust27–13-0.0213%8 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0625%8 Sept
train13–4-0.0323%3 Sept
mirage13–10-0.096%3 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0114%3 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0717%1 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0721%1 Sept
cache13–6-0.0524%1 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.0511%31 Aug
inferno2–8-0.0417%30 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0815%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0215%30 Aug
dust212–12-0.0214%30 Aug
overpass13–11-0.0018%30 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0820%28 Aug
ancient13–60.0120%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0216%28 Aug
dust213–11-0.0520%23 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0324%23 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0113%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0222%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0317%23 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0117%23 Aug
dust24–13-0.066%21 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0128%21 Aug
train13–9-0.0214%19 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0716%19 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0719%18 Aug
dust213–5-0.070%18 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0818%17 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0411%16 Aug
nuke7–30.0322%16 Aug
train13–70.0222%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0210%13 Aug
nuke13–50.0314%11 Aug
mirage3–13-0.078%10 Aug
inferno13–50.0515%9 Aug
train13–6-0.0726%8 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0714%6 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0322%5 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0517%4 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0421%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0015%4 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1012%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.0514%3 Aug
train5–130.0539%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0711%1 Aug
dust213–20.0117%1 Aug
inferno19–17-0.076%1 Aug
shelter13–3-0.0629%1 Aug
dust213–3-0.0924%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0323%30 Jul
inferno13–10.0413%30 Jul
anubis13–50.0319%30 Jul
dust213–8-0.0726%29 Jul
dust213–11-0.0127%29 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0616%28 Jul
nuke13–40.000%28 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0414%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0728%26 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0238%26 Jul
nuke10–1-0.0530%26 Jul
train13–0-0.0321%25 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0123%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0426%22 Jul
cache13–00.0242%20 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1314%20 Jul
dust213–5-0.0413%20 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0426%20 Jul
cache13–10-0.0918%19 Jul
nuke5–3-0.0511%19 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0317%19 Jul
cache0–30.00100%19 Jul
train6–0-0.070%19 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0418%18 Jul
inferno0–13-0.020%18 Jul
ancient13–11-0.1028%18 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0919%17 Jul
train13–9-0.0611%17 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0122%16 Jul
ancient13–20.0114%16 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0515%16 Jul
vertigo13–4-0.0427%15 Jul
cache13–7-0.0431%15 Jul
dust211–13-0.099%13 Jul
nuke6–130.0031%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.0521%12 Jul
train9–13-0.0826%12 Jul
mirage13–10.0635%12 Jul
vertigo10–130.0015%12 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0733%12 Jul
dust213–2-0.0223%12 Jul
ancient13–70.0115%12 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0422%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →