wiLL — CS2 Stats

76561198087333483[U:1:127067755]

2,071Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,423Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3170 of 27928 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning45

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateLLWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1

Aggression5.9

Utility5.1

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning4.5

Utility5.1

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time563ms−57ms

first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms

Headshot accuracy22.5%+0.6%

first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 7–13

13–0Biggest win — inferno

11Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 74% over 19dust2Weakest map · 44% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	S	19	14–5	74%	0.02
mirage	S	16	11–5	69%	-0.01
ancient	A	16	9–7	56%	0.01
nuke	B	15	7–8	47%	0.01
anubis	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.01
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
inferno	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
office	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

902Matches

52%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

75.1ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	70	54%	1.02	14.6
Anubis	63	62%	0.97	14.7
Mirage	59	46%	0.99	15.8
Nuke	50	58%	0.95	15.3
Inferno	37	54%	0.92	14.3
Vertigo	33	48%	1.00	16.2
Dust2	24	42%	0.88	16.0
Overpass	11	45%	0.91	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.4%Spray accuracy

76.0%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

556msReaction time

38.7%T opening success

37.8%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

5.27HE damage / grenade

13.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4177 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.7429% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–10	0.04	31%	28 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	11%	28 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.09	20%	25 Aug →
inferno	0–13	-0.09	23%	25 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.03	28%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	22%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	26%	23 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.08	28%	23 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	31%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–0	0.09	9%	22 Aug →
office	5–13	-0.01	42%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	19%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.05	24%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	23%	22 Aug →
anubis	1–9	-0.02	27%	19 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	10%	19 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.00	23%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.06	44%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.03	12%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	15%	19 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.00	29%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	22%	17 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	13%	17 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	33%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	12%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	15%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.02	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	24%	16 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.03	32%	15 Aug →
inferno	0–13	-0.04	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.11	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.04	27%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.10	18%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	18%	15 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.00	22%	15 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.02	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.00	18%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.06	27%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	28%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	41%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	37%	14 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.04	19%	14 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	24%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.09	29%	14 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.02	40%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.02	16%	13 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	23%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	33%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	35%	11 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	20%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	13%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	14%	10 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.04	19%	10 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	23%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	22%	10 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	12%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	21%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	19%	9 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.01	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.01	18%	9 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	19%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	24%	9 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	26%	9 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	30%	9 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	15%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	34%	9 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	19%	9 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	25%	9 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	26%	9 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.08	23%	9 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	18%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	15%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	32%	8 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	22%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	28%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	15%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.03	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	17%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	27%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.04	9%	8 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.04	13%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	26%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.08	36%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	30%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.04	17%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	16%	7 Aug →
anubis	1–10	-0.00	21%	7 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	23%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.05	18%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.08	24%	7 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	16%	7 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.11	24%	7 Aug →