div — CS2 Stats

76561198084505937[U:1:124240209]✓ No bans

1,608Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,899Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning51

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–33–5Last 10062%Win rateLWWWLWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6

Aggression6.1

Utility5.0

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.1

Utility5.0

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time550ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms

Headshot accuracy20.8%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–2

13–2Biggest win — anubis

9Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 92% over 12anubisWeakest map · 55% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	30	17–13	57%	0.01
anubis	A	22	12–10	55%	0.02
inferno	A	14	8–6	57%	0.01
ancient	S	12	11–1	92%	0.01
cache	S	10	7–3	70%	0.01
dust2	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (55% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

167,077Lifetime kills

1.08K/D · Top 50% of tracked players

8,109Matches

48.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players

47.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players

16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players

18,872MVPs

4,853Hours (in match)

6,601Bombs planted

1,918Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,715

M4A4 / M4A1-S20,809

AWP17,886

Desert Eagle15,706

P2000 / USP-S11,747

Glock-186,271

P2506,270

UMP-453,533

Galil AR2,555

SSG 082,315

Lifetime map wins

12,563dust2

8,447inferno

4,216train

3,572nuke

2,782vertigo

1,304cbble

364dust

314lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

826Matches

55%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

74.3ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	90	57%	1.05	15.0
Anubis	48	54%	1.17	16.4
Ancient	42	60%	1.10	14.7
Inferno	27	63%	1.16	14.3
Dust2	18	56%	0.86	13.0
Nuke	9	44%	0.93	14.0
Overpass	6	67%	0.89	15.8
Cache	5	60%	0.98	14.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.4%Spray accuracy

82.6%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

547msReaction time

45.4%T opening success

31.5%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

2.9%Flash assists

10.32HE damage / grenade

7.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4562 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 31.4551% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	5–13	-0.02	21%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.06	22%	28 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	17%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	20%	26 Aug →
mirage	19–22	-0.01	11%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.00	14%	26 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.01	44%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	19%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.06	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.12	15%	13 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.00	16%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	32%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.03	22%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	23%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	38%	13 Aug →
inferno	9–7	0.09	23%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.04	22%	7 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.06	12%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	17–19	-0.01	29%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.06	19%	5 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.02	27%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	6%	5 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	16%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	23%	4 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	19%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.01	31%	4 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.01	26%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	17%	4 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.01	15%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	18%	3 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.01	22%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	23%	2 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.05	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	23%	2 Aug →
anubis	22–20	0.00	25%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	24%	31 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	17%	31 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	10%	31 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.05	18%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	17%	28 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.06	38%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	19%	27 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.09	25%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.15	30%	21 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.03	29%	21 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	22%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	21%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	10%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.04	22%	21 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	10%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.04	24%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	12%	20 Jul →
cache	10–1	0.06	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	18%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	30%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	21%	18 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	24%	18 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.01	15%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	25%	17 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	20%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.03	27%	17 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	25%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.11	28%	16 Jul →
anubis	16–12	-0.01	26%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	40%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	23%	15 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	3%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	20%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.02	10%	14 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.02	28%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	30%	10 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	28%	10 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	20%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	19%	9 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	29%	9 Jul →
mirage	22–19	0.05	13%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.05	29%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	20%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	22%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	27%	6 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.05	24%	29 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	25%	29 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.03	28%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.02	33%	29 Jun →
overpass	11–13	-0.03	26%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.06	28%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.07	23%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	21%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.14	26%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.02	11%	27 Jun →
mirage	16–12	-0.02	28%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	20%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.03	23%	25 Jun →
mirage	19–16	0.07	15%	25 Jun →