Not for long

Not for long — CS2 Stats

76561198083685475[U:1:123419747]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

498Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,825Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#37891 of 241567 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 11 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,274 +3,164 11 Mar2 Jun · 31 days played
20,11024,320peak 24,32011 Mar2 Jun
24,596Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-03-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 30 Aug 2026 and 24 Sep 2026.

Measured 30 Aug 202624 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate30.4%43.8%44.8%14.4% short
Shot accuracy16.4%12.0%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio1.041.021.03meets
Match win rate44.3%44.7%45.2%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNot for longFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning53
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateWWLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +7.0pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.1
Utility4.9
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.5

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time603ms+53ms
first ⅓ avg 550ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 30 Mar
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · dust2, 11 Mar
398msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 23 Mar
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 15 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36191753%0.01
dust2C23101343%-0.02
infernoB147750%0.01
anubisA117464%0.00
overpassS96367%0.02
cache42250%0.01
nuke21150%0.04
ancient1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

145,545Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,979Matches
44.3%Match win rate
30.4%Headshot %
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
8,968MVPs
1,825Hours (in match)
4,451Bombs planted
1,448Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4777,395
AWP11,707
SSG 082,367
P2502,288
Negev2,109

Lifetime map wins

7,201nuke
6,991dust2
3,531inferno
1,632train
810cbble
558vertigo
133office
92lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
601msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
10.02HE damage / grenade
4.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.9688% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0232%21 Jul
cache13–90.0633%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0413%21 Jul
cache7–130.0028%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0024%20 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0950%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.0041%9 Jul
mirage13–3-0.056%2 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0319%31 May
anubis11–130.0317%31 May
nuke8–130.0931%31 May
mirage5–130.0224%31 May
dust213–10-0.0215%31 May
dust216–14-0.0115%31 May
mirage7–3-0.0213%31 May
dust213–50.0120%31 May
ancient5–130.0329%30 May
mirage13–10-0.0512%30 May
mirage13–40.0927%29 May
dust213–20.037%29 May
overpass13–80.0642%23 May
inferno13–40.0438%23 May
mirage6–13-0.0210%17 May
dust25–13-0.0617%29 Apr
cache7–130.0036%28 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0117%26 Apr
dust24–13-0.0416%26 Apr
anubis10–13-0.058%26 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0514%24 Apr
anubis13–60.0927%24 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0442%23 Apr
inferno13–100.0328%16 Apr
dust210–13-0.0412%16 Apr
overpass13–4-0.0027%15 Apr
mirage13–110.0021%15 Apr
overpass16–130.0415%15 Apr
mirage13–40.0225%14 Apr
mirage13–90.0625%14 Apr
overpass13–50.0324%14 Apr
mirage13–100.0517%9 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0119%9 Apr
overpass13–90.0313%9 Apr
dust26–13-0.0523%9 Apr
mirage6–130.0318%6 Apr
dust28–13-0.0629%6 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0218%2 Apr
mirage13–30.1518%30 Mar
dust22–13-0.104%28 Mar
inferno10–130.0527%28 Mar
dust213–100.0417%28 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0517%27 Mar
inferno7–130.0330%27 Mar
overpass15–15-0.009%26 Mar
dust211–13-0.0327%24 Mar
inferno10–130.0528%23 Mar
dust25–13-0.0721%23 Mar
anubis13–90.0619%23 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0018%22 Mar
anubis16–140.0222%22 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0323%22 Mar
overpass7–130.0227%22 Mar
mirage13–100.0137%22 Mar
dust25–130.0417%20 Mar
mirage13–110.0030%20 Mar
dust213–50.0928%20 Mar
overpass13–110.0120%19 Mar
mirage7–130.0421%19 Mar
mirage13–80.0518%19 Mar
inferno13–70.0927%19 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0326%17 Mar
mirage13–80.0733%17 Mar
inferno13–50.0415%17 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0030%16 Mar
dust213–10-0.0620%16 Mar
mirage8–130.0223%16 Mar
anubis16–120.0417%16 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0026%15 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0023%15 Mar
overpass15–150.0322%15 Mar
inferno13–0-0.0117%15 Mar
mirage8–130.0024%14 Mar
anubis13–16-0.0119%14 Mar
mirage13–20.0825%14 Mar
dust27–13-0.0827%14 Mar
mirage13–50.0921%14 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0318%14 Mar
dust211–130.0424%14 Mar
anubis13–4-0.0613%14 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0925%14 Mar
dust26–13-0.0123%13 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0219%13 Mar
dust213–4-0.0123%13 Mar
inferno10–130.0128%13 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0031%12 Mar
dust215–150.0017%12 Mar
mirage13–80.0327%11 Mar
dust25–00.0867%11 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0110%11 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0218%11 Mar
dust213–9-0.059%11 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →