Rambo55

Rambo55 — CS2 Stats

76561198083130652[U:1:122864924]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

900Tracked matches41%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,996Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,982Top 25% of 210,006 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43143 of 257064 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,189 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,982 +4,742 10 Sept – 23 Oct · 19 days played
18,24023,188peak 23,18810 Sept23 Oct
23,209Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,189Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,189
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 12 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 206 below peak (23,188)
  • +2,523 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,018 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate43.0%45.7%46.8%3.8% short
Shot accuracy10.2%12.7%13.0%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.201.051.06above
Match win rate44.6%45.7%46.3%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRambo55FACEITLevel 7 · 1,189 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,982 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,189csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning61
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLLLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.1
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time504ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 6–1 · inferno, 25 Sept →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 5–8 · mirage, 18 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 6–1 · inferno, 25 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2715–1256%0.04
cacheS1711–665%0.03
mirageC177–1041%-0.00
anubisS1510–567%0.04
nukeC104–640%0.01
dust2C83–538%-0.02
ancientB63–350%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,419Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
2,578Matches
44.6%Match win rate
43.0%Headshot %
10.2%Shot accuracy
5,870MVPs
1,010Hours (in match)
1,995Bombs planted
540Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,643
AWP6,580
MP91,930
SSG 081,651
P901,224
Tec-91,144

Lifetime map wins

7,601dust2
3,462inferno
1,780nuke
398train
157vertigo
98cbble
69aztec
47office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

62Matches
60%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
87.3ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1191%1.7419.2
Dust21040%1.0717.0
Cache1050%1.0617.8
Mirage1050%1.1317.2
Inferno967%1.2116.1
Anubis650%1.0816.8
Ancient475%1.2416.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
498msReaction time
67.4%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
14.0%Flash assists
5.24HE damage / grenade
20.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0611%24 Oct →
inferno11–130.0022%23 Oct →
nuke11–130.0025%23 Oct →
cache13–50.0416%23 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0917%23 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0520%23 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0216%23 Oct →
anubis6–130.1321%23 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.008%22 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0118%22 Oct →
inferno13–90.1320%22 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0718%22 Oct →
inferno15–150.039%22 Oct →
cache16–120.0522%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0612%21 Oct →
mirage2–10-0.0428%21 Oct →
inferno16–140.0512%21 Oct →
anubis16–120.0713%21 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.0217%21 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0221%21 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0213%21 Oct →
nuke13–50.0621%20 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0725%20 Oct →
mirage13–60.018%18 Oct →
inferno11–130.0118%18 Oct →
mirage5–80.0355%18 Oct →
cache4–130.0519%18 Oct →
inferno13–80.0426%18 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0514%17 Oct →
anubis3–130.0215%17 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0018%17 Oct →
mirage13–110.0819%17 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0217%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.0620%16 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0419%16 Oct →
inferno6–130.0019%16 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0413%16 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0342%16 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0119%16 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.059%13 Oct →
cache13–20.0318%13 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0313%13 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0430%10 Oct →
mirage15–150.0537%9 Oct →
dust213–100.0117%9 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0717%8 Oct →
cache16–130.0722%8 Oct →
inferno16–140.0017%8 Oct →
dust23–13-0.019%8 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0326%8 Oct →
anubis13–40.029%4 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0421%4 Oct →
anubis13–50.1929%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0417%4 Oct →
cache13–20.1629%29 Sept →
anubis13–100.1210%29 Sept →
cache0–13-0.0420%25 Sept →
inferno6–10.2726%25 Sept →
inferno10–00.049%25 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.1014%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.0918%25 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0111%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0713%23 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0612%23 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0616%23 Sept →
anubis13–70.0530%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0114%16 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0213%15 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0622%15 Sept →
inferno13–60.1219%15 Sept →
cache13–30.1520%15 Sept →
mirage4–130.0021%15 Sept →
ancient13–70.0219%15 Sept →
inferno13–70.1237%15 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0314%15 Sept →
anubis13–110.0823%13 Sept →
nuke13–80.0115%13 Sept →
dust213–40.0224%13 Sept →
nuke13–20.1126%13 Sept →
cache16–130.0318%10 Sept →
inferno13–30.1332%10 Sept →
inferno10–130.0625%10 Sept →
inferno8–20.0722%10 Sept →
inferno13–50.1023%10 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0723%9 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0222%9 Sept →
nuke10–130.0425%9 Sept →
cache10–130.0021%7 Sept →
mirage8–130.0116%7 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0223%7 Sept →
inferno11–130.0326%7 Sept →
mirage9–130.0226%7 Sept →
cache16–140.0621%7 Sept →
inferno15–150.0415%6 Sept →
anubis13–70.0614%4 Sept →
mirage13–60.0334%4 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0315%4 Sept →
inferno13–70.0415%3 Sept →
cache13–30.0533%3 Sept →
nuke6–130.0213%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.