Heckster

Heckster — CS2 Stats

US76561198083013231[U:1:122747503]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,459Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,469Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,071 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,071 → 2,071
+1Tracked matches · now 1,459
0.0ppWin rate · 46.4% → 46.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 1 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,689 -478 25 Jun28 Jun · 2 days played
22,68923,167peak 23,16725 Jun28 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,071 +0 3 Sept4 Sept · 2 observations
2,0712,071peak 2,0713 Sept4 Sept
23,675Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,071Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,071
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 429 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.3%46.8%48.3%1.0% short
Shot accuracy7.2%13.0%13.2%6.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.061.070.24 short
Match win rate36.9%46.3%46.9%10.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHecksterFACEITLevel 8 · 2,071 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO2,071csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning49
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44488Last 10044%Win rateTLWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.0

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time553ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 20 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · anubis, 20 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · overpass, 22 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 23% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2251723%-0.01
dust2B189950%-0.02
cacheB147750%-0.02
ancientA138562%-0.01
infernoA127558%-0.02
anubisC94544%-0.02
nukeA74357%-0.02
overpass3030%-0.03
train1010%0.07
vertigo1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,784Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
3,089Matches
36.9%Match win rate
47.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7.2%Shot accuracy
5,863MVPs
3,264Hours (in match)
1,689Bombs planted
888Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,164
AWP5,346
MP92,373
MAC-101,664
P2501,078

Lifetime map wins

3,450inferno
2,448dust2
2,443nuke
1,406vertigo
1,382train
690cbble
187office
60ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

698Matches
55%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
71.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16153%0.8613.8
Ancient7961%0.7913.3
Anubis7455%0.8613.4
Inferno4448%0.8212.8
Nuke4159%0.8613.1
Overpass3956%0.9113.9
Vertigo3853%0.9413.4
Dust23043%0.8113.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
569msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
8.31HE damage / grenade
4.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7777% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0418%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0320%23 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0218%22 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0318%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0222%21 Aug
nuke13–50.0311%21 Aug
dust213–90.1020%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0714%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.054%17 Aug
cache13–7-0.0315%17 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0311%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0225%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0315%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0713%11 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0115%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.079%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0313%9 Aug
dust213–80.0718%8 Aug
cache13–8-0.0219%7 Aug
anubis13–100.0210%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0412%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0317%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0517%6 Aug
dust20–2-0.060%6 Aug
cache3–13-0.0626%2 Aug
mirage17–19-0.0215%2 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0220%2 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0419%2 Aug
inferno13–5-0.076%2 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0118%1 Aug
dust213–10-0.0413%1 Aug
inferno13–20.006%1 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0016%1 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0514%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.017%1 Aug
mirage8–130.0020%1 Aug
anubis13–10-0.008%31 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0315%28 Jul
cache12–120.0122%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0718%27 Jul
cache12–16-0.0316%26 Jul
inferno3–13-0.038%26 Jul
anubis6–13-0.047%26 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0315%26 Jul
dust213–3-0.0216%26 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0229%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0614%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0120%25 Jul
ancient13–50.0920%25 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0111%24 Jul
dust215–150.0215%23 Jul
cache13–8-0.095%23 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0120%23 Jul
dust213–10-0.0519%23 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0216%21 Jul
anubis12–120.0133%20 Jul
cache13–160.0916%19 Jul
cache13–80.0024%18 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0019%12 Jul
cache13–9-0.0617%12 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0312%28 Jun
dust213–8-0.0115%27 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0813%25 Jun
mirage9–130.0117%25 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0216%25 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0310%25 Jun
mirage11–130.0720%25 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0314%24 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0314%23 Jun
ancient13–110.0215%23 Jun
train11–130.0719%22 Jun
cache11–13-0.0324%22 Jun
vertigo8–130.0720%22 Jun
dust25–13-0.098%4 Jun
cache13–5-0.0426%11 May
cache13–50.0116%11 May
cache3–130.0112%10 May
mirage13–11-0.0315%14 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0313%14 Mar
nuke4–130.015%13 Mar
overpass15–15-0.0110%13 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0616%11 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0318%8 Mar
inferno7–13-0.028%7 Mar
inferno13–30.0218%4 Mar
dust210–13-0.0126%3 Mar
dust213–11-0.0111%2 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0312%28 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0117%28 Feb
dust213–60.0720%26 Feb
mirage13–40.0214%26 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0416%22 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0613%20 Feb
nuke1–8-0.0912%11 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0017%9 Feb
anubis12–12-0.0016%4 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0013%3 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0430%2 Feb
nuke13–70.0010%2 Feb
overpass5–13-0.066%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →