MLEasy

MLEasy — CS2 Stats

DK76561198082965185[U:1:122699457]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,525Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (44 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+13Tracked matches · now 1,525
−6.9ppWin rate · 51.7% → 44.8%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,405 +2,755 21 Feb – 6 Jul · 35 days played
24,58928,586peak 28,58621 Feb6 Jul
28,844Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,306Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-02-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMLEasyFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,306csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning55
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWLLLTWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.5
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time524ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 2 Apr →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · inferno, 2 Apr →
344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 26 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2816–1257%0.06
nukeB1910–953%0.02
anubisD154–1127%0.02
ancientA117–464%0.03
overpassA116–555%0.02
dust2C52–340%0.00
mirage—31–233%-0.01
debris—20–20%-0.04
sanctum—20–20%-0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.18
eldorado—11–0100%0.17
cache—11–0100%0.16
poseidon—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,781Matches
51%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
97.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
34%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5450%1.3717.9
Anubis3861%1.3518.3
Nuke2857%1.4921.0
Ancient2752%1.2318.1
Vertigo2143%1.2816.9
Mirage1650%1.6117.9
Cache944%1.4618.3
Overpass825%1.1918.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
530msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
11.49HE damage / grenade
11.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7021% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0615%22 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0616%3 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0221%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.1025%26 Sept →
debris8–80.0344%17 Sept →
vertigo9–20.1824%17 Sept →
eldorado9–40.1717%15 Sept →
debris6–9-0.1119%15 Sept →
ancient8–130.0511%12 Sept →
anubis13–40.1139%12 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0123%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0333%12 Sept →
inferno13–70.1517%2 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0621%17 Aug →
cache13–40.1646%8 Aug →
inferno13–40.1124%6 Aug →
anubis13–80.1325%6 Aug →
anubis5–130.1016%26 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0313%6 Jul →
inferno11–130.0220%1 Jul →
nuke13–100.0114%1 Jul →
nuke11–130.0526%1 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.110%18 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0838%12 Jun →
inferno10–10.1718%12 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0019%9 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0525%9 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0637%4 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0513%4 Jun →
anubis15–150.0018%25 May →
ancient13–110.0216%25 May →
inferno3–13-0.0515%25 May →
nuke13–110.0426%21 May →
nuke2–8-0.0133%21 May →
dust29–130.0422%17 May →
overpass13–110.0120%17 May →
ancient13–70.0525%17 May →
anubis13–90.035%11 May →
inferno16–130.0617%11 May →
inferno13–30.1448%5 May →
inferno13–80.1023%5 May →
overpass13–50.0921%4 May →
inferno13–100.0219%4 May →
overpass6–130.0222%1 May →
inferno10–130.0616%1 May →
anubis2–13-0.080%27 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0126%27 Apr →
nuke13–110.0121%27 Apr →
anubis4–130.0121%25 Apr →
inferno13–40.0921%25 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0710%25 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0121%20 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0324%20 Apr →
ancient13–90.1428%17 Apr →
mirage8–130.0633%17 Apr →
nuke13–100.0724%17 Apr →
nuke13–110.0626%16 Apr →
ancient13–50.0716%13 Apr →
anubis8–130.0219%5 Apr →
inferno4–130.0214%5 Apr →
anubis11–130.0418%5 Apr →
inferno9–70.2054%2 Apr →
nuke13–110.0019%29 Mar →
nuke7–130.0429%29 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0512%26 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.0011%24 Mar →
inferno12–160.0329%24 Mar →
nuke13–100.1227%23 Mar →
overpass11–130.0219%23 Mar →
inferno13–50.1227%19 Mar →
ancient13–80.0012%19 Mar →
overpass13–70.018%18 Mar →
anubis10–130.0819%18 Mar →
sanctum3–9-0.0714%17 Mar →
overpass9–60.1024%17 Mar →
nuke13–80.0624%14 Mar →
inferno13–30.0912%11 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0713%11 Mar →
dust213–40.0923%11 Mar →
inferno16–140.0711%10 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0223%10 Mar →
ancient0–13-0.0125%10 Mar →
inferno8–130.0317%7 Mar →
nuke1–130.0312%7 Mar →
inferno10–130.0421%7 Mar →
ancient13–70.0716%5 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0414%5 Mar →
inferno8–80.0430%5 Mar →
poseidon9–50.1016%5 Mar →
sanctum7–90.019%5 Mar →
inferno13–30.0520%3 Mar →
inferno13–100.0220%3 Mar →
overpass16–140.0016%2 Mar →
ancient16–130.0420%26 Feb →
nuke13–110.0316%26 Feb →
inferno8–130.0115%26 Feb →
overpass15–150.0013%22 Feb →
anubis13–110.0625%21 Feb →
overpass16–130.0522%21 Feb →
inferno13–50.0417%21 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.