SmoFFy

SmoFFy — CS2 Stats

76561198034101527[U:1:73835799]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,168Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,454 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,454 → 2,454
+13Tracked matches · now 2,168
+10.3ppWin rate · 44.8% → 55.2%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,312 -320 15 Jan – 4 Jul · 23 days played
23,45927,289peak 27,28915 Jan4 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,454 +0 2 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
2,4542,454peak 2,4542 Sept18 Sept
27,568Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,454Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-01-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,454
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 46 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSmoFFyFACEITLevel 10 · 2,454 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,454csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning58
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.8
Utility7.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 29.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 12 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · anubis, 25 May →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 1 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 6 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
10–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2616–1062%0.03
mirageA1911–858%0.01
anubisC166–1038%0.02
infernoC156–940%-0.00
nukeS86–275%0.03
overpassC73–443%0.04
dust2—41–325%-0.02
cache—32–167%0.05
train—10–10%-0.01
palacio—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,438Matches
56%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
78.2ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10658%1.0314.8
Anubis8761%1.0515.3
Mirage6748%0.9714.1
Inferno5953%1.0215.4
Nuke4171%1.2915.9
Vertigo2861%1.1014.9
Overpass2050%0.9413.9
Dust21225%0.9013.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
572msReaction time
24.4%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
10.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.3649% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0721%9 Oct →
cache13–60.1215%9 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0313%26 Sept →
cache13–110.0531%26 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0126%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0323%12 Sept →
mirage13–20.1527%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0053%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.0331%11 Sept →
mirage13–50.0415%20 Aug →
inferno6–130.0538%17 Aug →
dust24–130.0025%12 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0019%9 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0317%9 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0422%9 Aug →
anubis10–130.1040%2 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0118%29 Jul →
nuke13–70.0519%28 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0615%28 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0714%28 Jul →
dust213–100.0231%28 Jul →
ancient7–130.1130%4 Jul →
overpass13–110.0426%4 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0211%3 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0117%2 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0230%12 Jun →
inferno10–10.0229%12 Jun →
ancient13–50.0131%27 May →
anubis15–15-0.0054%25 May →
ancient13–11-0.0033%25 May →
inferno3–130.0224%25 May →
ancient7–13-0.0418%24 May →
dust29–13-0.0430%17 May →
overpass13–110.0327%17 May →
ancient13–7-0.0338%17 May →
ancient13–80.0429%10 May →
anubis13–70.0621%10 May →
mirage8–13-0.0721%7 May →
ancient2–13-0.0330%7 May →
ancient13–50.0024%7 May →
nuke13–80.0236%1 May →
ancient13–100.0919%26 Apr →
ancient13–30.1425%25 Apr →
anubis4–130.0429%25 Apr →
inferno13–40.0446%25 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0441%25 Apr →
anubis5–130.0515%24 Apr →
anubis13–110.0229%24 Apr →
overpass13–80.0224%24 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0221%24 Apr →
anubis4–130.0526%23 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0215%23 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0121%23 Apr →
mirage13–4-0.0224%21 Apr →
ancient13–90.0346%17 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0422%17 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0029%17 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0239%16 Apr →
mirage11–130.0127%11 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0323%1 Apr →
anubis13–50.0527%1 Apr →
ancient9–130.0153%30 Mar →
mirage12–120.0137%30 Mar →
overpass8–130.0526%30 Mar →
anubis13–10-0.0715%29 Mar →
mirage13–70.0723%29 Mar →
overpass10–130.0144%28 Mar →
inferno16–140.0628%10 Mar →
overpass10–130.0124%19 Feb →
nuke13–90.0849%19 Feb →
ancient13–40.1344%17 Feb →
inferno13–90.0421%17 Feb →
mirage13–40.0819%17 Feb →
overpass6–130.1126%12 Feb →
anubis13–90.0435%12 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0125%6 Feb →
ancient13–10.1129%6 Feb →
anubis15–150.0318%6 Feb →
ancient13–60.0329%3 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0238%1 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0127%29 Jan →
ancient13–30.1028%29 Jan →
mirage15–150.0524%29 Jan →
mirage13–16-0.0325%27 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.0421%26 Jan →
inferno14–16-0.0619%24 Jan →
anubis7–13-0.0424%24 Jan →
ancient13–40.0640%24 Jan →
ancient13–80.0537%24 Jan →
mirage13–80.0319%23 Jan →
nuke13–30.1130%23 Jan →
anubis5–130.0129%23 Jan →
inferno0–13-0.0729%19 Jan →
mirage13–50.0225%19 Jan →
mirage13–110.0236%18 Jan →
ancient5–13-0.0632%18 Jan →
train3–13-0.0136%15 Jan →
inferno5–130.0127%15 Jan →
palacio0–13-0.0529%15 Jan →
ancient7–130.0452%13 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.