Fiirmly

Fiirmly — CS2 Stats

FJ76561198082889559[U:1:122623831]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,957Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,876Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (37 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,957 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,365 +3,843 13 Mar – 3 Jun · 30 days played
17,52222,535peak 22,53513 Mar3 Jun
22,839Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-03-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.5%43.7%44.8%3.3% short
Shot accuracy12.2%12.0%12.4%meets
Kill/death ratio0.971.021.030.06 short
Match win rate49.4%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFiirmlyFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning52
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateLWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.0pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time619ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 30 Apr →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 30 Mar →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 24 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 30 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 36anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3623–1364%-0.01
mirageA2717–1063%-0.01
ancientA138–562%0.00
anubisD81–713%-0.02
infernoC73–443%0.00
cache—42–250%0.01
overpass—31–233%0.00
nuke—22–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

87,210Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
4,936Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
41.5%Headshot %
12.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9,857MVPs
1,876Hours (in match)
4,360Bombs planted
1,063Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,334
AWP11,407
SSG 082,737
FAMAS1,683
Tec-91,483

Lifetime map wins

10,069dust2
5,473inferno
2,425nuke
1,165vertigo
928cbble
923train
687office
234lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
55%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
73.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1560%1.0617.8
Dust21450%0.7613.5
Ancient786%1.3014.4
Inferno667%0.9816.3
Vertigo450%0.8111.8
Nuke2100%0.8211.0
Anubis10%0.397.0
Overpass1100%1.6024.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
621msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
11.02HE damage / grenade
9.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6447% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0315%28 Aug →
dust213–30.0837%28 Aug →
mirage9–130.0018%28 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0517%21 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0122%3 Jun →
mirage13–50.0223%25 May →
inferno6–130.0613%25 May →
mirage13–9-0.0529%18 May →
cache13–70.1024%9 May →
cache13–10-0.0219%4 May →
mirage4–13-0.057%3 May →
ancient6–13-0.034%3 May →
overpass11–130.0018%2 May →
dust213–9-0.0010%2 May →
mirage13–10-0.0316%2 May →
dust29–130.0217%2 May →
cache2–13-0.0316%2 May →
inferno6–13-0.0123%30 Apr →
dust213–20.1224%30 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0321%30 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0022%28 Apr →
ancient13–50.0619%28 Apr →
dust213–100.0616%27 Apr →
overpass4–13-0.0421%27 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0115%26 Apr →
dust213–5-0.0336%24 Apr →
inferno13–70.0513%24 Apr →
ancient6–130.0521%24 Apr →
inferno16–14-0.0417%24 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0517%23 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0319%14 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0013%14 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0117%12 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0311%12 Apr →
mirage15–150.0128%11 Apr →
ancient13–50.0521%11 Apr →
dust210–130.0118%11 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0313%10 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0311%6 Apr →
mirage13–110.0613%6 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0122%5 Apr →
dust213–2-0.0023%5 Apr →
nuke13–60.0215%5 Apr →
dust216–140.0415%5 Apr →
anubis10–130.0219%1 Apr →
dust210–13-0.076%1 Apr →
dust213–70.0115%1 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.078%1 Apr →
ancient9–130.0615%1 Apr →
nuke13–10.1145%30 Mar →
dust213–1-0.0024%30 Mar →
mirage13–80.0418%30 Mar →
mirage13–3-0.0119%30 Mar →
dust216–120.0225%30 Mar →
mirage0–13-0.0924%30 Mar →
mirage13–60.0424%30 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0324%29 Mar →
dust213–80.0126%29 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0217%29 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0626%26 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0525%26 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.0229%25 Mar →
dust213–30.0615%25 Mar →
overpass13–10.0519%23 Mar →
mirage6–0-0.030%23 Mar →
mirage13–20.013%23 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0315%23 Mar →
dust213–2-0.0224%23 Mar →
inferno13–60.0317%23 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0522%21 Mar →
mirage13–60.0214%21 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0426%20 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0414%20 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0415%20 Mar →
mirage13–110.0222%20 Mar →
mirage13–100.0526%20 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0415%20 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0217%18 Mar →
mirage9–130.0116%18 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0224%18 Mar →
dust213–100.0112%17 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0616%17 Mar →
dust213–30.0112%16 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.019%16 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0323%16 Mar →
ancient13–5-0.0320%16 Mar →
dust23–13-0.100%16 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0321%16 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0636%15 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0222%15 Mar →
anubis13–4-0.0113%15 Mar →
dust213–10-0.059%15 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0019%15 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0321%14 Mar →
ancient13–60.0220%14 Mar →
ancient16–130.0219%14 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0313%14 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.0312%14 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0122%14 Mar →
mirage13–70.0520%13 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.