TWITTER PROFILE PICTURE ENJOYER

TWITTER PROFILE PICTURE ENJOYER — CS2 Stats

76561198078044140[U:1:117778412]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,501Tracked matches79%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,322Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28518 of 252624 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−55Premier CS Rating · 24,377 → 24,322

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,322 +1,850 20 Sept – 17 Oct · 8 days played
22,47224,377peak 24,37720 Sept17 Oct
24,377Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 55 below peak (24,377)
  • +1,850 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 678 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTWITTER PROFILE PICTURE E…FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER24,322 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning56
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY69–24–7Last 10069%Win rateLWWWWWWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +75ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 99% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.6
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time585ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 12 Oct →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 3 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 9–0 · ancient, 2 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 89% over 9dust2Weakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2114–767%0.01
cacheS1915–479%0.05
nukeS1711–665%0.03
vertigoS118–373%0.03
infernoS98–189%0.05
ancientA74–357%0.01
dust2B63–350%0.03
office—42–250%-0.03
fachwerk—22–0100%0.11
train—10–10%0.03
anubis—11–0100%-0.01
shelter—10–10%0.08
boulder—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches
48%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
87.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5149%1.3017.7
Dust22635%1.3318.9
Inferno1776%1.3314.8
Ancient1217%1.0720.3
Cache1060%1.3621.9
Nuke850%1.3312.8
Vertigo2100%2.4818.5
Anubis10%1.2018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
576msReaction time
51.3%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
6.92HE damage / grenade
7.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4117 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache0–4-0.030%17 Oct →
inferno13–60.0221%17 Oct →
mirage13–10.118%17 Oct →
cache13–90.0224%17 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0427%17 Oct →
nuke13–50.0519%17 Oct →
vertigo2–3-0.0625%17 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0022%17 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0119%17 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0025%17 Oct →
mirage11–00.0619%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0523%16 Oct →
nuke13–50.0616%16 Oct →
cache13–20.0417%16 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0419%16 Oct →
cache13–20.1219%14 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0111%14 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0122%14 Oct →
mirage8–130.0121%14 Oct →
mirage8–00.0519%13 Oct →
ancient13–20.0635%13 Oct →
cache4–13-0.037%13 Oct →
cache13–10.2020%12 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0213%12 Oct →
mirage1–4-0.0533%12 Oct →
ancient16–140.029%11 Oct →
ancient13–100.0626%11 Oct →
train12–120.0327%10 Oct →
nuke13–100.1520%10 Oct →
nuke13–90.0113%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0617%10 Oct →
vertigo6–130.0624%10 Oct →
cache13–100.0536%10 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.0219%9 Oct →
inferno13–90.1122%8 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0321%8 Oct →
cache16–140.0517%8 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0014%7 Oct →
inferno13–100.0212%7 Oct →
inferno13–90.0322%7 Oct →
mirage0–6-0.038%7 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0326%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0115%7 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0221%7 Oct →
office6–13-0.0524%6 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0122%6 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0224%5 Oct →
inferno13–60.1922%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.0611%5 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0624%5 Oct →
mirage13–20.0626%5 Oct →
vertigo13–11-0.0220%4 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0118%4 Oct →
nuke10–130.0821%4 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0530%4 Oct →
dust211–130.0115%3 Oct →
dust213–50.0437%3 Oct →
mirage6–130.0213%3 Oct →
nuke13–20.0516%3 Oct →
cache3–130.0220%3 Oct →
dust212–120.0624%3 Oct →
cache13–10.1130%3 Oct →
mirage13–00.0136%3 Oct →
cache13–80.0734%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0516%3 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0512%3 Oct →
mirage13–90.0720%2 Oct →
cache13–80.0713%2 Oct →
office13–7-0.0223%2 Oct →
vertigo13–60.1019%2 Oct →
nuke12–120.0422%2 Oct →
mirage13–30.0126%2 Oct →
ancient9–00.0414%2 Oct →
ancient6–130.0022%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.0515%1 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0019%1 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0315%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0018%1 Oct →
cache13–110.0323%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0117%1 Oct →
vertigo5–130.0221%1 Oct →
cache13–60.0525%30 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0925%30 Sept →
inferno13–80.0415%29 Sept →
vertigo13–80.1423%29 Sept →
shelter12–120.0832%29 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0136%29 Sept →
fachwerk13–20.1935%28 Sept →
nuke13–60.0923%28 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0321%28 Sept →
nuke13–100.0530%28 Sept →
cache13–90.1021%28 Sept →
office2–13-0.0225%28 Sept →
inferno13–60.0818%28 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0431%28 Sept →
cache13–80.069%28 Sept →
dust213–100.0826%28 Sept →
office13–10-0.0221%28 Sept →
boulder13–60.1117%27 Sept →
fachwerk13–100.0318%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.