$hadY ツ

$hadY ツ — CS2 Stats

76561198076740909[U:1:116475181]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,671Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,096Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,707 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,671 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,607 +1,098 8 Apr – 4 May · 5 days played
21,50922,867peak 22,8678 Apr4 May
22,867Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,707Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-02-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,707
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 5 Sep 2026 and 8 Oct 2026.

Measured 5 Sep 2026 → 8 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.7%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy16.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.971.061.070.10 short
Match win rate44.9%46.3%46.9%2.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG$hadY ツFACEITLevel 8 · 1,707 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,707csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning58
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD32–62–6Last 10032%Win rateLLLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −81ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 4–15–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time658ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 6–13 · mirage, 21 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · nuke, 7 Apr →
422msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 25 Jun →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 1 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L5Current streak
1–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D268–1831%-0.00
cacheD217–1433%0.02
mirageD133–1023%0.03
anubisB84–450%0.02
infernoD71–614%-0.01
overpassA53–260%0.01
ancientC52–340%-0.01
vertigo—41–325%-0.05
nuke—41–325%-0.00
office—31–233%-0.03
train—20–20%-0.03
alpine—11–0100%0.08
stronghold—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

114,328Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
5,020Matches
44.9%Match win rate
47.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
11,443MVPs
3,096Hours (in match)
5,727Bombs planted
1,204Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,559
AWP10,967
P2502,119
P902,026

Lifetime map wins

12,978dust2
6,493inferno
2,874nuke
2,563cbble
1,384train
413vertigo
162office
159lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,175Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
83.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21030%0.9614.5
Mirage70%0.9515.3
Nuke757%1.5117.6
Inferno757%1.3219.1
Anubis650%1.0017.7
Ancient540%1.0416.2
Overpass450%1.6717.0
Train1100%2.0825.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
661msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
8.66HE damage / grenade
15.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.638% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo7–9-0.0615%26 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.0116%25 Jun →
cache7–13-0.0323%25 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0527%25 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0012%6 Jun →
dust213–60.0035%6 Jun →
mirage6–130.1322%21 May →
dust29–13-0.0317%21 May →
cache7–13-0.0014%21 May →
anubis11–130.0114%21 May →
dust213–100.0217%13 May →
office1–7-0.0214%13 May →
cache11–130.0816%13 May →
cache12–120.0919%13 May →
cache5–13-0.0614%8 May →
cache7–130.1321%7 May →
cache13–7-0.0224%7 May →
cache8–130.0430%6 May →
cache13–40.0611%6 May →
cache11–130.0429%6 May →
cache13–100.0210%6 May →
cache13–90.0711%6 May →
dust24–13-0.0012%4 May →
cache13–90.0217%4 May →
cache11–13-0.0114%4 May →
cache2–7-0.060%4 May →
overpass13–80.0311%4 May →
cache13–9-0.0223%3 May →
cache11–130.0718%3 May →
cache10–13-0.0315%29 Apr →
cache13–50.0421%29 Apr →
cache9–130.0016%29 Apr →
mirage13–110.0823%24 Apr →
anubis13–80.0619%16 Apr →
mirage12–120.0220%16 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0519%16 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0920%16 Apr →
vertigo12–12-0.0419%12 Apr →
overpass13–30.0111%11 Apr →
dust213–100.0436%11 Apr →
inferno13–90.0224%11 Apr →
inferno13–160.0420%10 Apr →
anubis11–130.0719%10 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0022%10 Apr →
dust213–30.0320%9 Apr →
mirage12–120.0524%9 Apr →
ancient13–40.0411%9 Apr →
inferno4–130.0525%9 Apr →
nuke13–70.0138%9 Apr →
anubis13–40.0926%8 Apr →
inferno1–13-0.0630%7 Apr →
nuke0–4-0.1450%7 Apr →
alpine13–40.0821%7 Apr →
anubis13–40.0022%7 Apr →
office2–13-0.0413%7 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0022%7 Apr →
train6–13-0.0343%7 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0016%5 Apr →
dust25–13-0.055%5 Apr →
vertigo8–13-0.0622%4 Apr →
vertigo13–6-0.059%2 Apr →
dust211–130.0220%2 Apr →
nuke11–130.1021%1 Apr →
anubis13–20.0818%1 Apr →
ancient1–13-0.0336%1 Apr →
dust212–120.0020%1 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0528%1 Apr →
mirage10–130.0824%1 Apr →
stronghold5–130.0113%1 Apr →
train5–13-0.0311%1 Apr →
office13–8-0.0210%1 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0925%31 Mar →
dust22–130.0021%31 Mar →
overpass13–100.0226%31 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0427%31 Mar →
dust27–130.0027%30 Mar →
mirage14–160.0711%30 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0322%30 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0017%28 Mar →
mirage11–130.0312%28 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0116%28 Mar →
dust213–90.0530%28 Mar →
dust213–80.0113%27 Mar →
dust22–13-0.0119%27 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0615%27 Mar →
dust213–30.0824%27 Mar →
nuke12–120.0315%25 Mar →
mirage13–90.0617%25 Mar →
mirage10–130.0215%23 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0029%23 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0221%22 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0724%22 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0519%22 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0320%13 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0136%26 Feb →
mirage3–130.0121%26 Feb →
dust22–13-0.0513%22 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0031%22 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0533%14 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0326%14 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.