Kylar

Kylar — CS2 Stats

PROPlainswalkerPhantom EsportsPolandRiflerSettings & gear profile →

PL76561198076696741[U:1:116431013]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,289Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,583 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,289 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 25 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,583 +0 28 Aug17 Sept · 7 observations
3,5833,583peak 3,58328 Aug17 Sept
3,583Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-04-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,583
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 417 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKylarFACEITLevel 10 · 3,583 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,583csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning61
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5941Last 10059%Win rateWLLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 397ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 412ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility7.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.1
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time433ms−94ms
first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 433ms
Headshot accuracy27.1%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 3 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 4 Sept
266msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 7 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB26141254%0.01
dust2A2214864%0.01
mirageB1910953%0.02
nukeB158753%0.03
anubisB63350%0.01
overpassS660100%0.05
infernoS54180%0.02
cache1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,997Matches
62%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
86.1ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
25Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage50360%1.3918.1
Ancient34261%1.4017.9
Anubis33960%1.4818.2
Nuke21166%1.4818.2
Dust214251%1.3317.6
Vertigo5963%1.3919.0
Overpass5066%1.5917.4
Train4055%1.3116.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$3,075Inventory value45ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Karambit | Fade (Factory New)$1,775M4A1-S | Printstream (Minimal Wear)$421M4A1-S | Fade (Factory New)$326AWP | Asiimov (Well-Worn)$124USP-S | Printstream (Minimal Wear)$91AK-47 | Inheritance (Minimal Wear)$85

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
429msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
11.63HE damage / grenade
17.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8833% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–40.1034%15 Sept
mirage7–130.0223%7 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0724%7 Sept
inferno7–130.0050%4 Sept
inferno13–110.0320%3 Sept
mirage13–80.0424%3 Sept
dust28–13-0.0314%30 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0128%30 Aug
cache11–13-0.0024%29 Aug
dust213–50.0535%29 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0027%28 Aug
ancient13–00.1833%28 Aug
nuke10–130.0124%28 Aug
ancient17–190.0128%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0326%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0336%20 Aug
nuke13–60.0432%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0115%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0331%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0414%9 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0129%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0516%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0432%9 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0232%8 Aug
dust213–40.0522%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0311%8 Aug
inferno19–170.0222%8 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0418%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0442%7 Aug
dust213–30.0114%7 Aug
mirage13–20.2335%3 Aug
mirage13–60.0237%25 Jul
nuke9–130.0044%17 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0526%17 Jul
nuke16–140.0128%16 Jul
ancient11–130.0215%16 Jul
dust211–130.0141%16 Jul
anubis13–50.1135%15 Jul
nuke13–50.0834%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0121%15 Jul
ancient13–100.1225%13 Jul
mirage13–20.1535%13 Jul
ancient13–70.1033%21 Jun
dust210–130.0430%21 Jun
nuke19–160.0329%21 Jun
dust213–90.0825%20 Jun
anubis13–110.0435%20 Jun
ancient16–140.0423%18 Jun
overpass13–110.0619%18 Jun
mirage7–130.0332%7 Jun
overpass13–110.0438%7 Jun
dust213–60.0321%7 Jun
dust29–13-0.0315%5 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0129%5 Jun
ancient13–90.0333%3 Jun
overpass13–110.0022%3 Jun
dust213–110.0418%1 Jun
mirage10–130.0020%1 Jun
overpass13–100.1129%1 Jun
nuke16–140.0333%30 May
mirage13–90.0221%30 May
overpass16–12-0.0126%29 May
mirage8–13-0.0132%29 May
nuke14–16-0.0027%29 May
mirage10–13-0.0721%28 May
nuke9–13-0.0426%28 May
mirage2–13-0.0417%28 May
dust210–13-0.0229%27 May
mirage13–4-0.0119%25 May
dust213–70.0426%25 May
mirage13–80.0930%24 May
dust28–13-0.0425%23 May
dust213–60.0130%21 May
mirage13–11-0.0025%19 May
overpass13–80.0728%19 May
mirage7–130.0217%6 May
ancient13–6-0.0231%6 May
nuke11–130.0426%6 May
ancient10–13-0.0927%5 May
nuke13–90.0834%5 May
dust213–10-0.0124%5 May
ancient3–13-0.0133%4 May
dust213–100.0829%4 May
ancient13–40.0213%3 May
dust213–100.0324%3 May
ancient5–13-0.0620%30 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0124%30 Apr
dust213–70.0031%29 Apr
ancient13–110.0240%29 Apr
dust24–13-0.0844%28 Apr
ancient13–70.0317%28 Apr
nuke13–100.0832%28 Apr
mirage13–80.0333%27 Apr
nuke13–40.0647%27 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0030%27 Apr
dust213–30.0321%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0319%26 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0118%25 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0415%25 Apr
dust216–120.0330%25 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →