nicoodoz

nicoodoz — CS2 Stats

PROdaimonECSTATICDenmarkAWPerSettings & gear profile →

JP76561198073117127[U:1:112851399]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,758Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 4,069 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 4,069 → 4,069
+5Tracked matches · now 4,758
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 3 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 4,069 +0 28 Aug16 Sept · 4 observations
4,0694,069peak 4,06928 Aug16 Sept
4,069Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-03-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 4,069
  • Reached: 4,000 ELO · 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO
  • 4,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnicoodozFACEITLevel 10 · 4,069 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO4,069csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim98
Positioning61
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 458ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 471ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.8
Utility6.4
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 98 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.8
Positioning6.1
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time465ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 512ms → last ⅓ avg 465ms
Headshot accuracy28.9%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 15 May
62%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 1 Apr
313msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 9 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
716In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA26151158%0.02
mirageC2381535%0.01
nukeC114736%0.03
infernoS107370%0.03
anubisD103730%0.01
overpassS86275%0.03
dust2A74357%0.03
cache42250%0.04
train110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9,273Matches
56%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
88.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage72756%1.2418.6
Ancient58659%1.3118.9
Nuke33462%1.3519.1
Anubis17262%1.2718.9
Vertigo10255%1.1417.3
Overpass8759%1.2418.8
Inferno7454%1.1616.9
Train7159%1.3319.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$20,201Inventory value86ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
M4A4 | Howl (Minimal Wear)$1,834M4A1-S | Welcome to the Jungle (Factory New)$1,824★ Butterfly Knife | Gamma Doppler (Factory New)$1,808★ Karambit | Doppler (Factory New)$1,770AWP | Dragon Lore (Factory New)$1,745★ Sport Gloves | Hedge Maze (Field-Tested)$1,731

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.1%Headshot accuracy
42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
6.3°Preaim
472msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
59.1%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
7.01HE damage / grenade
13.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7923% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–40.0322%15 Sept
nuke10–130.0339%9 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0340%7 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0519%7 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0333%4 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0230%3 Sept
mirage13–80.0533%3 Sept
cache13–50.0545%31 Aug
dust28–130.0323%30 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0143%30 Aug
cache11–130.0250%29 Aug
dust213–50.0438%29 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0426%28 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0226%28 Aug
ancient13–00.0623%28 Aug
nuke10–130.0230%28 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0421%27 Aug
ancient13–60.0041%25 Aug
ancient17–190.0224%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0227%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0628%13 Aug
dust213–50.0734%12 Aug
inferno13–70.0736%9 Aug
anubis11–130.0114%9 Aug
ancient6–130.0424%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0115%9 Aug
mirage10–130.0247%9 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0018%9 Aug
ancient13–50.1122%8 Aug
dust213–40.0628%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0115%8 Aug
inferno19–170.0626%8 Aug
anubis10–130.0313%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0624%7 Aug
dust213–30.0257%7 Aug
cache6–130.0430%30 Jul
cache13–90.0231%30 Jul
mirage11–130.0227%19 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0419%17 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0235%17 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0338%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0533%16 Jul
dust211–13-0.0150%16 Jul
anubis13–50.0528%15 Jul
nuke13–50.0536%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0139%15 Jul
train13–90.0533%16 Jun
nuke11–130.0435%16 Jun
mirage13–30.0637%16 Jun
ancient11–130.0725%7 Jun
anubis13–90.0225%15 May
inferno9–50.1635%15 May
ancient16–130.0431%25 Apr
anubis20–220.0228%23 Apr
inferno13–100.0828%14 Apr
ancient13–90.0825%7 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0329%7 Apr
mirage13–90.0630%4 Apr
ancient14–160.0125%3 Apr
mirage9–13-0.017%3 Apr
overpass13–50.0126%2 Apr
anubis11–130.0328%2 Apr
ancient13–60.0525%1 Apr
overpass10–130.0117%1 Apr
mirage6–130.0062%1 Apr
nuke13–80.0735%31 Mar
overpass13–20.0921%31 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0153%31 Mar
inferno13–80.0123%31 Mar
nuke13–20.1233%24 Mar
anubis9–130.0729%24 Mar
mirage10–130.0335%24 Mar
inferno8–130.0423%24 Mar
mirage13–60.0317%24 Mar
nuke11–130.0326%17 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0128%16 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0015%15 Mar
overpass13–10.0622%15 Mar
nuke10–130.0333%15 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0623%15 Mar
ancient13–80.0215%15 Mar
ancient13–80.0525%14 Mar
ancient13–80.0525%14 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0620%14 Mar
mirage13–60.1041%14 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0322%10 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0322%7 Mar
ancient8–130.0329%7 Mar
ancient9–130.0024%6 Mar
overpass13–100.0638%5 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0329%5 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0320%5 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0124%5 Mar
overpass13–80.0722%5 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0419%5 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0238%4 Mar
ancient13–100.0314%4 Mar
mirage17–190.0030%4 Mar
ancient20–220.0527%4 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0331%3 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →