✪ FR0STBITE_

✪ FR0STBITE_ — CS2 Stats

RU76561198073992611[U:1:113726883]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,654Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,344Top 10% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10300 of 251283 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,197 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,344 +364 30 Aug – 10 Oct · 13 days played
25,51126,606peak 26,60630 Aug10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,197 +0 2 Sept – 6 Sept · 2 observations
2,1972,197peak 2,1972 Sept6 Sept
26,606Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,197Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,197
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 303 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 262 below peak (26,606)
  • +833 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,656 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ FR0STBITE_FACEITLevel 8 · 2,197 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,344 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,197csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning52
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–46Last 10054%Win rateWWWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility7.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.2
Utility7.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time541ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 500ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 6–2 · rush_001, 9 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · office, 2 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · office, 2 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W5Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 17infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2413–1154%-0.00
ancientA1811–761%-0.00
mirageS1712–571%0.00
anubisC167–944%-0.01
infernoD93–633%-0.02
dust2C52–340%0.00
vertigo—42–250%-0.01
cache—31–233%-0.01
rush_001—11–0100%0.23
office—10–10%-0.10
poseidon—11–0100%0.05
eldorado—11–0100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

729Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
70.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16055%1.0113.1
Ancient12558%1.0913.9
Anubis11358%1.0513.8
Inferno8843%0.9813.2
Nuke8049%1.0213.9
Dust23444%1.0213.8
Cache3043%1.1216.4
Overpass1436%1.4413.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
541msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
10.40HE damage / grenade
16.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8682% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0014%10 Oct →
nuke9–60.0617%10 Oct →
ancient13–30.0828%9 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0713%9 Oct →
rush_0016–20.2340%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0010%9 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0122%8 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0118%8 Oct →
nuke7–130.0127%8 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0729%8 Oct →
inferno10–130.0220%8 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0312%8 Oct →
mirage4–12-0.0023%3 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0022%3 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0222%3 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0324%3 Oct →
vertigo6–13-0.0123%3 Oct →
ancient13–30.0525%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0118%3 Oct →
ancient19–170.0016%2 Oct →
mirage8–130.0220%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0317%30 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0218%29 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0113%29 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0413%28 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0610%23 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0316%22 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0714%22 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0429%22 Sept →
dust213–100.0431%21 Sept →
anubis9–130.0121%21 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.019%20 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0333%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0813%20 Sept →
nuke3–130.0319%19 Sept →
ancient13–30.0627%18 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0110%18 Sept →
anubis19–16-0.0122%17 Sept →
mirage13–70.0754%16 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0024%16 Sept →
anubis19–160.0520%15 Sept →
ancient4–130.0324%15 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.0317%15 Sept →
anubis16–120.0533%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.0046%10 Sept →
ancient13–70.0321%9 Sept →
mirage13–80.0919%9 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0111%6 Sept →
cache10–130.0331%6 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0922%6 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.1022%6 Sept →
office1–13-0.10100%2 Sept →
poseidon9–30.0513%31 Aug →
inferno9–30.0356%31 Aug →
nuke13–50.0226%30 Aug →
nuke13–60.0414%30 Aug →
nuke13–100.039%28 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0011%28 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0320%26 Aug →
nuke13–80.0020%22 Aug →
vertigo3–13-0.0615%22 Aug →
anubis13–50.0322%22 Aug →
nuke13–00.1324%22 Aug →
anubis10–130.0433%21 Aug →
anubis11–130.0222%21 Aug →
nuke13–50.0218%21 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0317%19 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0320%19 Aug →
inferno11–130.0327%17 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0129%16 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0019%16 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0622%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.048%15 Aug →
mirage13–40.0124%15 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0124%14 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0028%12 Aug →
dust213–60.0720%12 Aug →
nuke13–90.0014%12 Aug →
nuke15–19-0.0319%12 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.0316%9 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0329%9 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0632%7 Aug →
cache16–130.0220%7 Aug →
cache0–3-0.080%5 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0525%5 Aug →
ancient7–130.0118%5 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0119%5 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.054%5 Aug →
anubis0–3-0.100%5 Aug →
anubis18–22-0.0510%5 Aug →
nuke13–100.0219%5 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0217%2 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0616%31 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.043%31 Jul →
mirage13–90.0219%30 Jul →
nuke0–20.000%30 Jul →
eldorado9–00.1440%30 Jul →
vertigo13–90.0418%29 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0217%29 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.