*Tulkäs*

*Tulkäs* — CS2 Stats

76561198071493013[U:1:111227285]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,642Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,985Blue band · top ~33.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,220 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,985 -892 17 Sept – 12 Oct · 11 days played
13,40014,877peak 14,87717 Sept12 Oct
15,287Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,220Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-09-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,220
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 892 below peak (14,877)
  • -892 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,015 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG*Tulkäs*FACEITLevel 8 · 1,220 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER13,985 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,220csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +7.4pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time540ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 25 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 23 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 13 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 24cacheWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3115–1648%-0.01
mirageA2415–963%-0.01
anubisB2111–1052%-0.01
ancientC135–838%0.00
cacheD61–517%-0.01
nuke—44–0100%-0.01
inferno—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

974Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
74.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22150%0.9314.7
Dust215746%0.9114.4
Ancient14755%0.9715.8
Anubis9952%0.9316.0
Inferno3959%0.9113.5
Nuke3152%0.8012.0
Overpass1362%0.9314.1
Train743%0.8716.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
541msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
34.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
6.89HE damage / grenade
6.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0025% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0517%13 Oct →
mirage13–30.0321%13 Oct →
anubis16–120.0318%13 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0233%12 Oct →
cache11–130.0319%12 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0414%12 Oct →
mirage11–130.0031%12 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0230%12 Oct →
dust211–130.0116%12 Oct →
anubis17–190.007%11 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0110%11 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0420%9 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0615%9 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0116%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.048%7 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0719%7 Oct →
ancient13–70.0511%7 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0019%6 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.039%6 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.034%6 Oct →
ancient13–60.0317%6 Oct →
anubis13–110.0226%6 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0722%5 Oct →
dust24–13-0.107%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0616%5 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0113%5 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.019%5 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0118%4 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.009%4 Oct →
dust213–9-0.009%4 Oct →
cache3–80.0413%3 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0316%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0513%1 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.058%1 Oct →
anubis13–100.0111%1 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0313%1 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0018%30 Sept →
ancient13–40.0719%30 Sept →
dust27–130.0114%30 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0319%29 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0814%29 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0119%29 Sept →
dust213–30.0630%29 Sept →
ancient7–130.0615%28 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0213%28 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0521%28 Sept →
dust26–130.0023%28 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0215%28 Sept →
ancient19–17-0.0016%27 Sept →
dust213–90.0514%27 Sept →
nuke13–100.0117%27 Sept →
dust213–80.0726%26 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0224%26 Sept →
dust216–130.0311%26 Sept →
mirage10–130.0617%25 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0223%25 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0210%25 Sept →
dust213–30.0314%25 Sept →
inferno13–80.1119%25 Sept →
dust213–70.0716%25 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0632%24 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0514%24 Sept →
cache7–13-0.038%24 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0135%23 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0013%23 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0423%23 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0221%23 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0411%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.0330%22 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0529%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0320%22 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0410%22 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0025%22 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0119%22 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0323%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0320%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0231%21 Sept →
dust213–9-0.025%21 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0522%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.0415%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0421%21 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0519%21 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0518%21 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0517%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0919%21 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0619%21 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0127%20 Sept →
nuke13–50.0224%20 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0610%20 Sept →
anubis13–160.0313%20 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0314%19 Sept →
mirage13–40.0210%19 Sept →
dust211–130.0120%19 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0320%19 Sept →
dust22–13-0.078%19 Sept →
mirage13–100.0122%18 Sept →
dust213–30.0124%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0320%17 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0721%17 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0317%17 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.