︻デ 一 PALLE

︻デ 一 PALLE — CS2 Stats

DE76561198071253950[U:1:110988222]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,940Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,022Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,368Blue band · top ~52.9% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,368 +2,913 29 Aug23 Sept · 18 days played
7,45510,368peak 10,36829 Aug23 Sept
10,480Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,368
  • +2,913 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,632 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate44.0%41.9%44.3%meets
Shot accuracy0.1%9.6%11.8%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.760.981.030.27 short
Match win rate41.6%43.8%45.2%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG︻デ 一 PALLEPREMIER10,368 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning68
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT43534Last 10043%Win rateLWWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 444ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility3.7
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning6.8
Utility3.7
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time514ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 484ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 13 Sept
29%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · vertigo, 12 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 23 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17ancientWeakest map · 8% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2271532%-0.02
nukeA2011955%0.01
infernoS1711665%0.00
anubisB147750%0.02
ancientD121118%-0.01
mirageB63350%0.01
cacheD51420%-0.01
vertigo2020%-0.06
boulder110100%-0.03
italy110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,587Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
2,659Matches
41.6%Match win rate
44.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
0.1%Shot accuracy
4,454MVPs
1,022Hours (in match)
3,525Bombs planted
602Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,493inferno
4,056dust2
3,985nuke
3,027vertigo
862train
106office
72italy
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches
25%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
67.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage50%0.7611.6
Anubis20%0.6110.0
Inferno250%0.7611.0
Dust21100%1.2327.0
Ancient1100%2.6013.0
Overpass10%0.6712.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
507msReaction time
60.7%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
6.30HE damage / grenade
3.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1848% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3669 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0413%23 Sept
inferno13–50.0324%23 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0121%23 Sept
nuke13–60.0613%23 Sept
anubis13–110.0112%23 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0010%23 Sept
nuke13–40.0114%23 Sept
dust213–30.028%23 Sept
nuke13–40.0323%23 Sept
nuke11–130.019%22 Sept
anubis13–30.0510%22 Sept
anubis10–130.0514%22 Sept
dust23–130.0211%22 Sept
nuke12–10.0210%22 Sept
ancient5–13-0.029%22 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0120%21 Sept
nuke13–80.0619%21 Sept
ancient9–130.0510%21 Sept
inferno13–50.0214%19 Sept
nuke13–7-0.042%19 Sept
cache7–130.0422%19 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0611%19 Sept
anubis13–160.0713%19 Sept
cache6–130.0113%19 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0120%18 Sept
dust210–13-0.0414%18 Sept
mirage13–00.1127%18 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0413%14 Sept
dust28–13-0.0317%14 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0115%14 Sept
dust213–90.0327%14 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0022%14 Sept
ancient11–130.0020%14 Sept
dust24–13-0.0617%13 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0614%13 Sept
anubis13–110.0711%13 Sept
nuke13–30.2319%13 Sept
mirage10–130.0217%13 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0313%13 Sept
inferno13–50.0017%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0119%12 Sept
ancient13–60.0128%12 Sept
cache13–50.0317%12 Sept
anubis11–130.0411%12 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0519%12 Sept
vertigo8–13-0.1028%12 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.0329%12 Sept
dust29–13-0.048%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0326%11 Sept
dust25–13-0.0915%11 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0025%11 Sept
inferno13–60.0324%11 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0514%11 Sept
ancient14–160.0518%11 Sept
dust25–13-0.0314%10 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0414%10 Sept
anubis15–150.0211%10 Sept
inferno13–90.0614%10 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0110%10 Sept
nuke13–110.0110%9 Sept
dust211–13-0.0414%9 Sept
mirage15–150.049%9 Sept
dust213–90.0213%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0319%9 Sept
anubis13–90.019%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0116%9 Sept
dust215–150.0214%8 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0224%8 Sept
dust213–9-0.0113%8 Sept
nuke13–90.0112%8 Sept
cache9–13-0.1025%8 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0010%8 Sept
nuke15–15-0.059%6 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0514%6 Sept
inferno16–140.0211%6 Sept
anubis10–130.0413%6 Sept
nuke13–40.0713%6 Sept
boulder13–8-0.0325%6 Sept
italy13–40.0319%6 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0821%6 Sept
dust213–6-0.0024%6 Sept
inferno13–60.078%6 Sept
mirage13–110.0114%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.059%5 Sept
anubis13–80.026%5 Sept
cache5–13-0.0220%5 Sept
dust27–13-0.0514%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0810%2 Sept
inferno5–13-0.019%2 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0116%1 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0315%30 Aug
dust213–80.1020%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0516%30 Aug
nuke5–130.0022%30 Aug
inferno9–130.0117%29 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0220%29 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0715%29 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0214%29 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0620%22 Aug
dust213–16-0.0215%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →