Riekko

Riekko — CS2 Stats

FI76561198070795698[U:1:110529970]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,167Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating23,563Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34384 of 238125 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,563 +2,173 23 Aug20 Sept · 10 days played
21,39023,563peak 23,56323 Aug20 Sept
23,563Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-08-23

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,563
  • +2,173 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,437 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRiekkoFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER23,563 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning68
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT573310Last 10057%Win rateWWWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 473ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.3
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch8.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time512ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 529ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · office, 8 Sept
32%Best headshot accuracy · 16–12 · cache, 20 Sept
328msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · vertigo, 18 Sept
13–1Biggest win · train, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
W3Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1991047%-0.00
officeC1871139%0.03
nukeS1512380%0.02
dust2S98189%0.01
cacheA85363%0.01
overpassS86275%0.05
vertigoB63350%0.02
anubisD51420%-0.03
mirage42250%0.04
ancient31233%-0.02
train21150%0.10
boulder110100%-0.05
italy110100%0.12
poseidon1010%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache580%1.0117.4
Dust2475%1.2916.5
Inferno333%0.8213.3
Nuke3100%1.1614.3
Ancient2100%1.0415.0
Anubis1100%2.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
510msReaction time
62.3%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
12.75HE damage / grenade
9.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4124 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
boulder13–11-0.0514%22 Sept
italy13–50.124%22 Sept
office13–2-0.0610%21 Sept
office8–13-0.0519%21 Sept
dust213–3-0.0221%20 Sept
inferno13–10-0.058%20 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0418%20 Sept
cache16–120.0132%20 Sept
nuke13–80.0121%20 Sept
anubis13–160.0214%20 Sept
dust25–13-0.059%20 Sept
overpass5–9-0.0310%19 Sept
inferno4–90.0418%19 Sept
poseidon4–9-0.1713%19 Sept
inferno8–8-0.049%19 Sept
vertigo5–90.036%19 Sept
overpass9–40.0710%19 Sept
inferno9–10.1219%19 Sept
nuke9–60.0412%19 Sept
inferno8–80.0314%19 Sept
nuke7–9-0.117%18 Sept
vertigo2–9-0.1622%18 Sept
overpass9–40.1810%18 Sept
inferno2–9-0.170%18 Sept
nuke9–4-0.0412%18 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0520%18 Sept
overpass9–50.059%18 Sept
vertigo8–8-0.037%18 Sept
nuke9–5-0.0520%18 Sept
dust213–100.0418%18 Sept
inferno13–80.0014%18 Sept
cache13–110.0213%18 Sept
nuke13–100.0514%18 Sept
dust213–3-0.020%18 Sept
inferno9–30.1032%18 Sept
inferno9–5-0.056%17 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0312%16 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0321%13 Sept
overpass9–50.0420%13 Sept
inferno4–9-0.1311%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0518%13 Sept
train13–10.1114%13 Sept
office13–8-0.034%13 Sept
overpass8–8-0.079%13 Sept
nuke9–2-0.0113%13 Sept
vertigo9–30.1222%13 Sept
inferno9–30.0430%13 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0320%10 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0317%10 Sept
train11–130.0821%10 Sept
nuke8–8-0.0120%9 Sept
inferno9–70.1113%9 Sept
office12–120.0417%9 Sept
office13–10.1326%9 Sept
nuke2–130.0117%8 Sept
office5–130.0516%8 Sept
office13–30.1917%8 Sept
office13–50.1010%8 Sept
mirage13–80.0220%7 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0118%5 Sept
cache13–11-0.0315%5 Sept
dust213–70.0423%5 Sept
nuke13–70.0015%5 Sept
dust213–110.0121%4 Sept
dust213–30.005%4 Sept
nuke13–40.0215%4 Sept
cache16–140.0213%4 Sept
mirage8–130.059%4 Sept
cache7–130.0714%4 Sept
office13–30.1031%3 Sept
office6–13-0.0116%3 Sept
office0–13-0.055%3 Sept
office6–13-0.0121%3 Sept
office1–13-0.0520%3 Sept
office4–13-0.0221%3 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0513%1 Sept
cache13–40.0420%1 Sept
dust213–70.0417%1 Sept
overpass13–30.087%1 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0115%1 Sept
dust213–110.0220%30 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0432%30 Aug
nuke13–90.0414%30 Aug
mirage13–10.1127%30 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0111%30 Aug
ancient13–100.0110%30 Aug
nuke13–40.0215%30 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0223%30 Aug
office12–120.0618%27 Aug
office5–130.028%27 Aug
office12–12-0.025%25 Aug
office13–60.1124%25 Aug
nuke9–60.1218%24 Aug
vertigo9–00.1511%24 Aug
nuke9–10.1810%24 Aug
overpass9–10.1013%24 Aug
vertigo9–70.0211%24 Aug
inferno8–80.1420%24 Aug
cache9–13-0.0315%23 Aug
inferno5–13-0.073%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →