sIW ♿

sIW ♿ — CS2 Stats

SE76561198070119651[U:1:109853923]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,422Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,345Purple band · top ~27% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,345 -529 8 Sept – 30 Sept · 21 days played
13,63516,183peak 16,1838 Sept30 Sept
16,637Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 838 below peak (16,183)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,655 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsIW ♿FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,345 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning50
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–49–10Last 10041%Win rateLWLTWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +7.0pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 706ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 703ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 710ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility7.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 690ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.0
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time682ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 682ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 24 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 13 Sept →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 29 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C197–1237%-0.01
infernoA1811–761%0.00
cacheC145–936%-0.03
ancientC146–843%-0.01
anubisD124–833%-0.02
mirageC94–544%-0.02
nukeD82–625%-0.01
vertigo—42–250%-0.02
debris—10–10%0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

199Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
81.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage922%0.8911.8
Ancient520%0.8513.4
Nuke540%0.9913.6
Inferno367%0.8513.0
Anubis367%1.0913.3
Overpass20%0.9215.5
Vertigo10%0.274.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
690msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
11.30HE damage / grenade
12.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7017% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache14–16-0.0413%30 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0419%30 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0119%30 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0720%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.0335%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0020%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0121%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0421%29 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0536%29 Sept →
inferno13–40.0344%29 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0822%29 Sept →
anubis10–130.0016%29 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0117%29 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0420%29 Sept →
ancient13–60.0418%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0814%29 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.029%28 Sept →
dust29–130.0021%28 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0817%28 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0524%28 Sept →
inferno13–100.0225%28 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0126%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0614%28 Sept →
inferno11–130.0326%28 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0222%28 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0122%27 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0227%27 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0523%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0429%26 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0018%26 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0426%26 Sept →
cache8–130.0141%26 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0529%26 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0125%26 Sept →
inferno3–130.0024%26 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0335%26 Sept →
dust27–130.0119%26 Sept →
anubis6–130.0127%25 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0220%25 Sept →
cache13–90.0124%25 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0518%25 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0521%25 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0033%25 Sept →
mirage6–130.0025%24 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0011%24 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0530%24 Sept →
vertigo1–13-0.0540%24 Sept →
nuke12–120.0716%24 Sept →
inferno13–30.0933%24 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0416%24 Sept →
cache10–13-0.1029%22 Sept →
debris8–80.0123%22 Sept →
poseidon8–8-0.0129%22 Sept →
ancient8–130.0517%21 Sept →
anubis13–70.0334%21 Sept →
inferno13–70.0114%21 Sept →
nuke13–50.0736%20 Sept →
ancient13–110.0029%19 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0416%19 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0232%19 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0422%19 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0323%19 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0213%19 Sept →
dust213–90.0626%19 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0320%19 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0219%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0324%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0230%19 Sept →
dust215–150.0124%18 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0128%18 Sept →
cache7–130.0021%16 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0344%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.0324%15 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0532%15 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0812%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0425%14 Sept →
mirage13–40.0129%13 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0315%13 Sept →
anubis13–100.0224%13 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0145%13 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0833%12 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0421%12 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0429%12 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0322%12 Sept →
ancient13–40.0322%12 Sept →
inferno8–130.0120%12 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0818%11 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0514%10 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0626%10 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0522%10 Sept →
dust29–130.0121%10 Sept →
cache3–9-0.0341%10 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0312%10 Sept →
ancient13–10.0331%10 Sept →
anubis13–90.0134%10 Sept →
dust214–160.0135%9 Sept →
mirage13–100.0437%9 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0527%8 Sept →
cache9–130.0224%8 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0127%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.