movelikejaeger

movelikejaeger — CS2 Stats

DE76561198069184236[U:1:108918508]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

522Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,701Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,369Purple band · top ~19% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 10 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,369 -809 24 Jul22 Sept · 22 days played
17,36919,350peak 19,35024 Jul22 Sept
19,708Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,981 below peak (19,350)
  • -1,654 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,631 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches16
Win rate50%
K/D0.96
Headshot %52%

Measured 16 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches60
Win rate50%
K/D0.96
Headshot %54%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate49.5%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy19.1%12.0%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio0.981.021.030.05 short
Match win rate45.7%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmovelikejaegerFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,369 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning45
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateLLWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.5
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time555ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 10–13 · anubis, 29 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 21 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · anubis, 21 Sept
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 31 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 14ancientWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%0.00
ancientC2281436%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
mirageA149564%0.01
cacheB126650%0.00
anubisB105550%0.01
nuke32167%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,780Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
3,860Matches
45.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
49.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
19.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 5 players
10,377MVPs
1,747Hours (in match)
4,375Bombs planted
987Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,037dust2
3,678inferno
2,283train
2,099nuke
920cbble
301office
186italy
95dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

442Matches
49%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
73.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24349%0.9614.9
Ancient3161%0.9814.3
Anubis2245%1.2516.7
Inferno1753%1.0915.0
Mirage1650%0.9414.3
Cache1040%1.0315.5
Nuke30%0.7011.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
553msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
9.06HE damage / grenade
8.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8144% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0224%22 Sept
inferno9–130.0222%22 Sept
mirage13–110.0221%22 Sept
anubis13–70.0428%21 Sept
ancient16–120.0012%18 Sept
mirage10–13-0.069%18 Sept
dust213–8-0.0417%18 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0124%18 Sept
dust213–60.0223%18 Sept
dust210–13-0.0224%18 Sept
anubis19–16-0.0228%15 Sept
mirage13–100.0132%15 Sept
cache7–13-0.0019%15 Sept
ancient13–70.0622%11 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0125%11 Sept
cache9–13-0.0427%11 Sept
mirage13–80.0321%11 Sept
anubis9–130.0222%11 Sept
dust213–16-0.0136%10 Sept
dust213–6-0.0229%10 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0936%10 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0229%9 Sept
anubis13–50.0722%9 Sept
dust213–70.0818%9 Sept
cache4–13-0.0430%9 Sept
inferno19–16-0.0425%7 Sept
ancient13–80.0113%7 Sept
dust213–50.0120%7 Sept
inferno13–6-0.069%6 Sept
cache13–90.0220%6 Sept
inferno16–120.0126%3 Sept
cache10–130.0027%3 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0421%3 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0229%3 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0627%2 Sept
ancient4–130.0320%2 Sept
dust26–13-0.0135%2 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0221%2 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0822%31 Aug
cache16–140.0827%31 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0124%31 Aug
mirage13–40.0534%31 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0133%30 Aug
dust213–11-0.0231%30 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0623%30 Aug
cache13–60.0123%30 Aug
dust213–16-0.0125%30 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0330%29 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0521%29 Aug
anubis10–130.1137%29 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0232%29 Aug
cache10–130.0023%29 Aug
mirage13–40.0324%29 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0720%27 Aug
dust213–30.0433%24 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0327%24 Aug
ancient5–130.0120%23 Aug
anubis13–80.0512%23 Aug
dust213–60.0123%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0317%21 Aug
mirage13–40.0338%21 Aug
cache16–14-0.0218%21 Aug
dust23–13-0.0728%21 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0332%19 Aug
dust213–60.0325%19 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0128%17 Aug
cache13–50.0023%16 Aug
ancient5–130.0129%16 Aug
cache11–130.0221%15 Aug
nuke13–60.0334%15 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0126%15 Aug
inferno16–140.0330%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0310%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0123%12 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0520%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.0622%10 Aug
dust27–130.0022%10 Aug
dust213–40.0238%7 Aug
dust213–80.0328%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0318%5 Aug
inferno11–130.0424%29 Jul
mirage8–130.1116%25 Jul
ancient9–130.0318%24 Jul
inferno13–50.0716%24 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0213%24 Jul
dust213–60.0625%24 Jul
inferno13–40.0517%24 Jul
cache13–7-0.0121%24 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0216%24 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0427%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0128%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0736%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0618%21 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0120%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0011%15 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0218%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0120%10 Jul
mirage13–160.0323%10 Jul
dust213–50.0117%10 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0312%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →