Die Spezialisten - Brank

Die Spezialisten - Brank — CS2 Stats

DE76561197990585631[U:1:30319903]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,587Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating22,136Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50720 of 239376 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 15 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,136 +3,753 15 Aug22 Sept · 28 days played
17,69123,471peak 23,47115 Aug22 Sept
23,471Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-08-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,335 below peak (23,471)
  • +3,017 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,864 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDie Spezialisten - BrankFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,136 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning59
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61363Last 10061%Win rateLWWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +45ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.0
Utility5.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time527ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 31 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 18 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 1 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 92% over 13infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2516964%0.03
cacheA1810856%0.02
infernoD1651131%0.02
mirageA149564%0.01
nukeS1312192%0.03
anubisS97278%0.04
ancientC52340%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

457Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
92.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1338%1.1216.9
Dust21267%1.2117.5
Anubis1070%1.3019.9
Nuke560%1.3519.6
Ancient540%1.1217.6
Cache2100%1.5822.0
Inferno250%0.789.5
Overpass1100%2.0024.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.6%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
529msReaction time
57.5%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
10.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0316%22 Sept
anubis13–70.0321%21 Sept
ancient13–60.0016%20 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0625%20 Sept
cache6–13-0.0218%19 Sept
ancient16–120.0313%18 Sept
mirage10–130.0119%18 Sept
dust213–80.0730%18 Sept
mirage8–130.0739%18 Sept
inferno6–130.0323%18 Sept
inferno14–160.016%16 Sept
cache13–80.0417%15 Sept
dust213–70.1122%14 Sept
anubis13–80.0616%14 Sept
dust24–13-0.0527%14 Sept
nuke13–90.1426%14 Sept
mirage13–80.0515%14 Sept
dust214–160.0217%13 Sept
dust213–16-0.0027%10 Sept
dust213–60.0216%10 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0419%9 Sept
dust213–90.0314%9 Sept
mirage13–110.0022%9 Sept
anubis13–50.1319%9 Sept
nuke13–30.027%8 Sept
cache8–13-0.0119%8 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0015%8 Sept
anubis13–100.0021%7 Sept
nuke13–60.1518%7 Sept
cache13–80.0317%7 Sept
cache13–80.1431%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0219%6 Sept
inferno16–120.0820%3 Sept
cache10–130.019%3 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0413%3 Sept
anubis13–1-0.0121%2 Sept
cache13–110.0514%2 Sept
dust213–50.0530%2 Sept
dust213–70.0922%2 Sept
dust213–110.0021%1 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0422%1 Sept
cache9–130.0213%1 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0411%1 Sept
dust213–110.0117%1 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0218%31 Aug
anubis13–30.1529%31 Aug
cache16–14-0.0314%31 Aug
inferno15–150.0118%31 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0417%31 Aug
nuke13–60.0135%30 Aug
dust213–110.0722%30 Aug
inferno9–130.0820%30 Aug
cache13–60.0329%30 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0124%29 Aug
cache11–130.0230%29 Aug
inferno13–90.1235%29 Aug
cache13–70.0126%29 Aug
dust27–10.0611%29 Aug
dust213–40.0329%29 Aug
mirage16–140.029%28 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0126%26 Aug
inferno13–30.0419%26 Aug
dust211–130.0215%26 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0522%25 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0514%25 Aug
dust213–110.0221%24 Aug
dust213–30.0838%24 Aug
inferno15–150.0316%23 Aug
dust27–130.0211%23 Aug
anubis16–130.0820%23 Aug
inferno9–130.0628%23 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0115%22 Aug
cache13–90.0224%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0432%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0017%22 Aug
ancient10–130.0014%21 Aug
mirage13–40.0318%21 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0319%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0126%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0622%21 Aug
mirage13–70.0417%20 Aug
nuke13–70.0929%20 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0217%20 Aug
dust213–80.1213%20 Aug
dust22–13-0.0335%19 Aug
cache10–13-0.0120%19 Aug
nuke13–60.0218%19 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0317%18 Aug
dust213–40.0325%18 Aug
dust213–60.0515%17 Aug
cache13–70.0326%17 Aug
inferno16–120.0230%17 Aug
nuke13–40.0238%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0117%16 Aug
cache13–7-0.0023%16 Aug
cache10–13-0.0019%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0011%16 Aug
nuke13–60.0718%15 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0614%15 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0316%15 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →