ANXIETY — CS2 Stats

76561198068977689[U:1:108711961]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,196Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating21,247Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#66779 of 259901 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,358 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,247 +1,844 22 Aug – 1 Nov · 31 days played

22,543Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,358Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

36Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,358
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 173 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

1,296 below peak (22,543)
+266 over 30 days · steady
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,753 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning53

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateLLLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

7–12–1 · 35% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.7

Utility6.1

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning5.3

Utility6.1

Mechanics3.8

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time546ms+43ms

first ⅓ avg 503ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms

Headshot accuracy21.9%+3.2%

first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 4–0 · nuke, 10 Oct →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–4 · nuke, 10 Oct →

391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 3 Oct →

13–2Biggest win · anubis, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

L4Current streak

10–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 76% over 21dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	21	16–5	76%	0.02
inferno	C	17	7–10	41%	0.01
cache	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.02
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.03
dust2	D	13	3–10	23%	0.00
anubis	A	11	6–5	55%	0.00
mirage	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.04
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
rush_001	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

193Matches

53%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

78.6ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	30	70%	1.23	16.7
Nuke	28	61%	1.07	14.7
Mirage	25	56%	1.10	14.4
Anubis	21	43%	1.15	15.5
Vertigo	16	31%	1.02	17.1
Dust2	13	46%	0.78	12.9
Ancient	11	45%	0.99	17.1
Cache	4	0%	0.72	12.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.3%Spray accuracy

67.1%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

550msReaction time

45.7%T opening success

38.4%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

9.8%Flash assists

9.36HE damage / grenade

8.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 38.4048% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	10–13	0.06	27%	1 Nov →
cache	10–13	-0.05	13%	1 Nov →
cache	9–13	-0.05	18%	31 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	19%	31 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.07	23%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.09	27%	24 Oct →
ancient	10–13	0.05	22%	24 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.04	15%	24 Oct →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	18%	23 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.06	7%	23 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.11	17%	23 Oct →
ancient	10–13	0.01	25%	23 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.12	21%	23 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	28%	21 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.01	20%	17 Oct →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	13%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.04	18%	17 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.02	22%	16 Oct →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	13%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	20%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	33%	12 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.04	27%	11 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	31%	11 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	22%	11 Oct →
inferno	7–13	0.03	22%	11 Oct →
nuke	6–4	0.09	42%	10 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.06	13%	10 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.06	27%	10 Oct →
nuke	4–0	0.19	33%	10 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	15%	4 Oct →
rush_001	2–6	-0.07	42%	4 Oct →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	6%	3 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	24%	2 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.06	20%	2 Oct →
cache	13–3	0.01	12%	26 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	32%	26 Sept →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	22%	26 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	21%	25 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	17%	25 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	30%	25 Sept →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	16%	23 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	-0.05	17%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.04	16%	22 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.02	26%	22 Sept →
shelter	10–13	0.12	23%	22 Sept →
shelter	5–1	0.04	10%	22 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.07	24%	22 Sept →
nuke	13–3	-0.03	23%	20 Sept →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	28%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	23%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–2	0.11	17%	20 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	22%	18 Sept →
nuke	16–14	0.00	17%	18 Sept →
ancient	6–13	0.04	15%	18 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	15%	18 Sept →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	20%	18 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.05	31%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	14%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.01	21%	17 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	20%	17 Sept →
dust2	15–15	0.01	29%	17 Sept →
ancient	6–13	0.06	18%	16 Sept →
ancient	7–13	0.03	20%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.05	13%	12 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.07	21%	10 Sept →
nuke	16–12	0.01	19%	9 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.09	10%	9 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.15	0%	8 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.03	25%	7 Sept →
inferno	3–13	0.02	28%	7 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	16%	6 Sept →
ancient	16–14	0.05	19%	5 Sept →
cache	13–9	-0.01	25%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.03	21%	3 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.00	29%	2 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.04	21%	2 Sept →
cache	16–14	-0.02	6%	2 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.02	13%	2 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	21%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	18%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.04	15%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	29%	1 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	32%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	17%	31 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	13%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.14	16%	31 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.10	26%	31 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	14%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.00	13%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	28%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	15%	30 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.06	30%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	16%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	8%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	7%	23 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.16	19%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	14%	23 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.00	16%	23 Aug →
nuke	8–8	0.11	24%	23 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.11	24%	22 Aug →