eNeiZz

eNeiZz — CS2 Stats

FI76561198068385040[U:1:108119312]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,202Tracked matches29%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,682Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 9 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,546 -2,924 9 Mar4 Jul · 12 days played
9,28912,470peak 12,4709 Mar4 Jul
12,570Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,185Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,185
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 16 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeNeiZzPEAK ELO1,185csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning64
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD31636Last 10031%Win rateTWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility4.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning6.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time592ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–3 · nuke, 19 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · inferno, 25 Mar
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 6 Sept
13–4Biggest win · ancient, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
511In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 44% over 9anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD2882029%-0.00
infernoD1961332%-0.00
ancientD1951426%-0.01
dust2D93633%-0.03
overpassC94544%0.01
anubisD61517%-0.05
mirageC52340%-0.02
vertigo31233%-0.00
cache110100%-0.02
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,594Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,179Matches
43.1%Match win rate
26.6%Headshot %
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
8,585MVPs
892Hours (in match)
1,838Bombs planted
1,140Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,299nuke
2,082inferno
1,995vertigo
939dust2
363train
36lake
35bank
18cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches
43%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.4ADR
26%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

10%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1258%1.2515.8
Ancient1050%1.2020.1
Mirage650%1.1816.2
Dust2617%0.9114.8
Anubis540%0.8814.4
Overpass20%1.1017.0
Vertigo1100%1.6725.0
Train10%0.337.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
599msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
10.47HE damage / grenade
5.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7464% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4498 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.1548% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–80.0610%19 Sept
nuke9–30.2324%19 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0415%18 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0011%18 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0211%13 Sept
dust26–13-0.075%13 Sept
nuke8–130.0013%6 Sept
dust27–13-0.0126%6 Sept
anubis9–13-0.007%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0120%29 Aug
ancient13–100.019%29 Aug
cache13–9-0.026%13 Aug
anubis3–13-0.079%13 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0023%13 Aug
dust27–13-0.0615%9 Aug
inferno9–40.1912%9 Aug
nuke9–50.0517%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0410%9 Aug
inferno5–9-0.1423%9 Aug
dust215–15-0.0117%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0010%8 Aug
ancient9–130.028%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0622%7 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0221%7 Aug
inferno13–50.0110%7 Aug
nuke11–130.0215%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0721%31 Jul
mirage13–50.0018%31 Jul
nuke6–130.0313%31 Jul
nuke8–80.0120%31 Jul
inferno6–90.047%31 Jul
overpass6–9-0.0810%13 Jul
nuke1–9-0.080%13 Jul
vertigo7–90.0118%13 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0112%13 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0420%4 Jul
inferno11–13-0.037%4 Jul
inferno9–40.1029%4 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0314%3 Jul
dust213–70.0031%3 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0425%3 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0210%27 Jun
overpass9–4-0.0213%27 Jun
nuke7–9-0.049%27 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0825%26 Jun
nuke13–80.0520%26 Jun
ancient7–130.0411%26 Jun
overpass13–70.118%26 Jun
inferno9–130.0110%26 Jun
vertigo1–9-0.2017%26 Jun
inferno9–20.1216%26 Jun
dust28–13-0.059%26 Apr
ancient10–130.0214%26 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0218%24 Apr
dust213–9-0.0023%24 Apr
inferno5–9-0.0523%24 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0820%24 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0614%24 Apr
inferno7–9-0.0216%24 Apr
overpass6–9-0.0317%22 Apr
nuke2–9-0.096%22 Apr
inferno7–90.0112%22 Apr
overpass6–130.059%19 Apr
nuke7–130.0310%19 Apr
overpass6–9-0.098%19 Apr
nuke9–50.0022%19 Apr
inferno9–70.1426%19 Apr
anubis0–13-0.0722%12 Apr
dust213–11-0.0017%12 Apr
inferno1–9-0.2515%12 Apr
vertigo9–30.189%12 Apr
nuke9–60.0313%12 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0310%7 Apr
ancient13–11-0.026%7 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0618%5 Apr
nuke13–50.0532%5 Apr
overpass9–60.2118%5 Apr
nuke5–9-0.1718%5 Apr
inferno3–9-0.149%5 Apr
train12–12-0.0229%3 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0321%3 Apr
nuke16–14-0.0310%3 Apr
dust24–13-0.0822%31 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0421%31 Mar
inferno6–90.059%31 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0110%25 Mar
inferno9–50.0944%25 Mar
nuke7–90.0315%24 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0215%24 Mar
nuke6–13-0.088%24 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0315%24 Mar
overpass13–16-0.060%23 Mar
nuke5–130.019%23 Mar
overpass9–50.0315%15 Mar
inferno2–9-0.184%15 Mar
nuke6–90.019%15 Mar
ancient11–130.037%15 Mar
nuke13–100.044%15 Mar
nuke8–13-0.047%9 Mar
anubis13–11-0.016%9 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →