Gab0ish

Gab0ish — CS2 Stats

CA76561198067834734[U:1:107569006]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

95Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.2 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating9,999Light Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (38 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2023-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 9,999
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGab0ishPREMIER9,999 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim18
Positioning30
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY18–38–4Last 6030%Win rateWLWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −88ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 60 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim1.8
Utility4.0
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.8
Positioning3.0
Utility4.0
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 2.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time657ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy9.8%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 9.8% → last ⅓ avg 9.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 60 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 28 Sept →
20%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 23 May →
453msFastest reaction time · 8–8 · dust2, 24 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 23 Jul →

Across the last 60 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
2–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 40% over 15nukeWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C156–940%-0.04
mirageC135–838%-0.05
infernoC104–640%-0.05
nukeD80–80%-0.05
cacheD51–420%-0.04
ancient—41–325%-0.02
anubis—21–150%-0.05
vertigo—20–20%-0.07
overpass—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 60 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.5%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
66.0%Counter-strafing
14.6°Preaim
635msReaction time
11.6%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
7.09HE damage / grenade
2.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 14.6057° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.4645% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.5433 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–13-0.045%11 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0518%11 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0514%11 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.065%3 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0619%3 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.058%3 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0810%30 Aug →
dust211–13-0.069%30 Aug →
dust28–13-0.053%25 Aug →
cache2–13-0.059%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.034%25 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0410%13 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.062%13 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0317%9 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.086%9 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0217%7 Aug →
cache16–13-0.048%7 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0413%6 Aug →
mirage13–30.0511%6 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.108%6 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0710%31 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.068%30 Jul →
nuke14–16-0.018%30 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.014%29 Jul →
dust24–13-0.069%29 Jul →
inferno13–20.047%23 Jul →
dust213–70.0317%23 Jul →
cache5–13-0.075%16 Jul →
dust29–13-0.047%24 May →
dust21–13-0.0720%23 May →
ancient12–12-0.050%23 May →
inferno3–13-0.095%23 May →
ancient6–13-0.0613%8 Dec →
nuke11–13-0.0319%8 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.088%8 Dec →
vertigo7–13-0.0416%28 Sept →
inferno13–80.079%28 Sept →
overpass8–13-0.0515%28 Sept →
ancient13–20.0613%28 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.079%27 Sept →
dust29–7-0.0719%25 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.097%25 Sept →
mirage5–9-0.1110%25 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.107%24 Sept →
vertigo2–9-0.0912%24 Sept →
mirage5–9-0.0911%24 Sept →
mirage9–5-0.058%24 Sept →
dust28–80.048%24 Sept →
mirage2–9-0.120%24 Sept →
mirage5–9-0.096%24 Sept →
mirage9–40.079%18 Sept →
cache5–9-0.0110%18 Sept →
mirage9–3-0.030%18 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.0511%15 Sept →
mirage3–9-0.1113%15 Sept →
mirage3–9-0.0519%15 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.148%15 Sept →
dust22–9-0.0615%13 Sept →
dust23–9-0.0611%13 Sept →
dust29–20.0613%13 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.