wiki — CS2 Stats
76561198066058005[U:1:105792277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,312), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 4 median | Level 5 median | vs Level 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 38.9% | 42.7% | 43.7% | 4.9% short |
| Shot accuracy | 16.1% | 11.3% | 12.0% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.21 | 0.99 | 1.02 | above |
| Match win rate | 46.4% | 43.9% | 44.7% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction
Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 2–3 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating 0.01
- Avg headshot accuracy 21%
- Avg reaction 522ms
Last 10
- 5–5 · 50% win rate
- Avg rating 0.01
- Avg headshot accuracy 24%
- Avg reaction 542ms
Last 20
- 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
- Avg rating 0.01
- Avg headshot accuracy 23%
- Avg reaction 521ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 nuke | B | 79 | 38–41 | 48% | 0.01 |
 cache | C | 10 | 4–6 | 40% | -0.00 |
 vertigo | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | -0.01 |
 inferno | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | -0.01 |
 ancient | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.03 |
 dust2 | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.06 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anubis | 4 | 75% | 0.94 | 17.0 |
| Vertigo | 3 | 33% | 1.98 | 23.0 |
| Ancient | 1 | 0% | 0.58 | 11.0 |
| Nuke | 1 | 100% | 1.62 | 21.0 |
| Overpass | 1 | 100% | 2.60 | 26.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.3329% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nuke | 11–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 16 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | -0.03 | 9% | 16 Oct → | |
| cache | 3–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 14 Sept → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.02 | 28% | 14 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.04 | 33% | 14 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.04 | 21% | 12 Sept → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.04 | 45% | 5 Sept → | |
| cache | 11–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 3 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.01 | 31% | 3 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.04 | 18% | 2 Sept → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | 0.04 | 11% | 1 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 6–13 | -0.05 | 33% | 1 Sept → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | -0.05 | 17% | 1 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.11 | 11% | 1 Sept → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.00 | 41% | 1 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.05 | 11% | 29 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | 0.05 | 20% | 29 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | 0.03 | 22% | 29 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–6 | 0.00 | 26% | 29 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.03 | 23% | 29 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 2–13 | -0.06 | 21% | 29 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.02 | 23% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 0–6 | -0.06 | 6% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | -0.11 | 22% | 27 Aug → | |
| nuke | 7–1 | 0.06 | 17% | 27 Aug → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.02 | 15% | 26 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.01 | 16% | 26 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.01 | 12% | 26 Aug → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.03 | 19% | 24 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | -0.01 | 23% | 24 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.00 | 18% | 24 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.06 | 24% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.02 | 21% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | -0.00 | 17% | 22 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | 0.01 | 18% | 22 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.02 | 14% | 22 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | -0.01 | 16% | 21 Aug → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.03 | 11% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | 0.03 | 13% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.11 | 24% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | -0.06 | 18% | 18 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | -0.02 | 27% | 22 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.06 | 29% | 22 Jul → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | 0.04 | 22% | 21 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.05 | 9% | 20 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–4 | -0.09 | 20% | 20 Jul → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 20 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | -0.01 | 23% | 19 Jul → | |
| nuke | 0–13 | -0.02 | 31% | 19 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.15 | 19% | 16 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | -0.01 | 18% | 16 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.04 | 17% | 2 May → | |
| cache | 8–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 2 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.02 | 15% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 6–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 11–13 | 0.00 | 20% | 30 Apr → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.04 | 13% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 1–13 | 0.03 | 16% | 30 Apr → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.07 | 19% | 26 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | -0.05 | 15% | 21 Apr → | |
| vertigo | 13–11 | -0.04 | 9% | 21 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | -0.01 | 17% | 21 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.05 | 19% | 20 Apr → | |
| vertigo | 13–0 | 0.05 | 11% | 19 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.05 | 21% | 19 Apr → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 14 Apr → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 12 Apr → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | 0.01 | 13% | 12 Apr → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.00 | 27% | 22 Mar → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.08 | 6% | 13 Mar → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.01 | 27% | 12 Mar → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | -0.07 | 15% | 12 Mar → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.01 | 31% | 27 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.04 | 15% | 27 Feb → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.03 | 21% | 27 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.03 | 18% | 19 Feb → | |
| nuke | 8–6 | 0.01 | 20% | 18 Feb → | |
| nuke | 2–6 | 0.07 | 28% | 18 Feb → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.00 | 17% | 17 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | -0.01 | 17% | 16 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.09 | 32% | 16 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.06 | 13% | 7 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.17 | 27% | 7 Feb → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 31 Jan → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | -0.10 | 17% | 29 Jan → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.12 | 21% | 29 Jan → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 29 Jan → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | -0.09 | 13% | 29 Jan → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.10 | 25% | 29 Jan → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 22 Jan → | |
| nuke | 0–13 | -0.11 | 0% | 17 Jan → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 27 Dec → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.04 | 23% | 27 Dec → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.02 | 23% | 27 Dec → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.04 | 11% | 3 Dec → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.09 | 29% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.04 | 23% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | -0.08 | 6% | 5 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.05 | 15% | 5 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.