möhömaha

möhömaha — CS2 Stats

FI76561198064843782[U:1:104578054]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

609Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,419Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.0 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating1,607Grey band · top ~93.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−133Premier CS Rating · 1,740 → 1,607
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 19 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 1,607 -447 19 Aug20 Sept · 19 days played
1,4612,262peak 2,26219 Aug20 Sept
2,277Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 655 below peak (2,262)
  • -447 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 3,393 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate40.0%41.9%42.7%2.7% short
Shot accuracy7.9%12.2%11.3%3.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.700.980.990.29 short
Match win rate36.8%43.3%43.9%7.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmöhömahaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER1,607 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim21
Positioning55
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39565Last 10039%Win rateLLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim2.1
Utility4.8
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 50% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.1
Positioning5.5
Utility4.8
Mechanics1.9
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time644ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 9.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 16 Sept
30%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 29 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 8–1 · inferno, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 27 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 12anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2371630%-0.03
dust2D1861233%-0.03
nukeB157847%-0.03
cacheB136746%-0.03
infernoB126650%-0.03
anubisD82625%-0.04
ancientD72529%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.05
office110100%-0.02
train110100%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,489Lifetime kills
0.70K/D
2,247Matches
36.8%Match win rate
40.0%Headshot %
7.9%Shot accuracy
3,552MVPs
766Hours (in match)
2,668Bombs planted
273Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,010inferno
2,543nuke
2,020dust2
1,032vertigo
567train
373cbble
170office
84lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
0%Win rate
0.55Avg K/D
59.4ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20%0.568.5
Anubis10%0.122.0
Nuke10%1.2117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.1%Spray accuracy
58.6%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
641msReaction time
41.0%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
7.69HE damage / grenade
6.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6442% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–13-0.0316%20 Sept
nuke5–130.0120%20 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0411%19 Sept
dust25–13-0.0316%19 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0615%19 Sept
mirage9–120.0225%19 Sept
cache3–13-0.0420%18 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0214%18 Sept
anubis11–13-0.037%18 Sept
mirage3–13-0.063%18 Sept
nuke13–40.0723%18 Sept
ancient11–130.0511%18 Sept
ancient11–13-0.018%18 Sept
mirage12–12-0.028%17 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0411%17 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0712%17 Sept
dust211–13-0.0421%17 Sept
inferno13–110.0910%16 Sept
dust213–30.0414%16 Sept
mirage12–30.0411%16 Sept
dust213–11-0.017%14 Sept
dust25–13-0.0616%13 Sept
anubis13–2-0.027%13 Sept
cache2–13-0.0613%13 Sept
vertigo13–60.0510%13 Sept
mirage6–13-0.118%13 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0510%13 Sept
nuke12–40.058%13 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0620%13 Sept
dust24–13-0.0711%10 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0717%8 Sept
office13–7-0.0228%8 Sept
cache2–100.0010%8 Sept
inferno8–1-0.0411%8 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0622%8 Sept
dust21–13-0.094%6 Sept
cache10–130.0118%6 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0813%6 Sept
mirage2–13-0.096%6 Sept
anubis4–13-0.058%5 Sept
nuke5–13-0.073%5 Sept
mirage13–5-0.035%5 Sept
mirage13–70.078%3 Sept
anubis13–8-0.038%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0410%3 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0716%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.014%1 Sept
anubis9–13-0.103%1 Sept
mirage8–20.0415%30 Aug
nuke13–90.0111%30 Aug
dust27–13-0.0214%30 Aug
train13–5-0.025%30 Aug
inferno9–40.026%30 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0118%30 Aug
anubis12–120.0018%29 Aug
dust213–70.0313%29 Aug
cache13–100.0210%29 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0416%29 Aug
inferno9–13-0.057%29 Aug
mirage3–130.0130%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.102%28 Aug
dust212–12-0.0111%28 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0010%28 Aug
cache13–6-0.062%28 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0310%28 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0214%28 Aug
dust213–11-0.0211%27 Aug
mirage13–1-0.003%27 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0313%27 Aug
nuke6–13-0.099%27 Aug
cache13–9-0.0110%27 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0314%27 Aug
inferno11–13-0.1010%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.0718%26 Aug
cache13–7-0.025%25 Aug
nuke7–13-0.046%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0712%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0811%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.055%25 Aug
mirage16–13-0.047%25 Aug
mirage7–130.007%25 Aug
dust24–13-0.0818%24 Aug
cache10–13-0.0411%24 Aug
nuke13–10-0.086%24 Aug
ancient13–6-0.027%24 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0513%23 Aug
ancient13–11-0.027%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0817%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.1216%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.084%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.067%23 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0110%23 Aug
dust213–20.015%23 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0911%20 Aug
dust213–4-0.0110%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.087%20 Aug
dust210–13-0.1012%19 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0214%19 Aug
cache5–1-0.0113%19 Aug
nuke13–90.086%19 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →