Cerulean

Cerulean — CS2 Stats

GB76561198064500283[U:1:104234555]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,878Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,108Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,088 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate32.4%43.8%44.8%12.4% short
Shot accuracy10.8%12.0%12.4%1.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.791.021.040.25 short
Match win rate42.8%44.7%45.2%2.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCeruleanFACEITLevel 5 · 1,088 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning34
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42526Last 10042%Win rateTWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · +81ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.4 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility2.9
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch8.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning3.4
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time623ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy11.6%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 11.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 25 Aug
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · vertigo, 27 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · nuke, 25 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD1551033%-0.03
cacheC156940%-0.03
vertigoB158753%-0.05
nukeC145936%-0.04
ancientC125742%-0.03
infernoC114736%-0.06
anubisA85363%-0.04
trainC52340%-0.03
overpass31233%-0.08
dust21010%-0.07
eldorado110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,056Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
3,241Matches
42.8%Match win rate
32.4%Headshot %
10.8%Shot accuracy
5,227MVPs
1,204Hours (in match)
4,562Bombs planted
517Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,561
SSG 082,639
UMP-452,595
Negev2,040
M2491,357
AUG1,215
MAG-71,213
FAMAS1,202

Lifetime map wins

3,515inferno
2,959nuke
2,781dust2
2,712vertigo
1,954office
808train
202lake
64italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
75%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
71.5ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno250%0.9018.5
Mirage250%0.527.0
Nuke2100%1.3622.5
Overpass1100%1.5614.0
Dust21100%0.7112.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
626msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
2.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.3395% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3275 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5517% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–12-0.047%19 Sept
cache13–6-0.0025%19 Sept
nuke4–13-0.085%18 Sept
cache13–80.009%18 Sept
ancient7–13-0.066%17 Sept
cache4–13-0.0317%17 Sept
nuke5–13-0.1412%17 Sept
train1–13-0.0414%17 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0827%17 Sept
mirage11–10.0213%17 Sept
mirage13–10-0.094%17 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.1320%17 Sept
ancient7–13-0.075%17 Sept
anubis13–9-0.059%17 Sept
nuke12–12-0.076%16 Sept
vertigo13–100.025%16 Sept
ancient8–13-0.077%16 Sept
mirage13–9-0.014%16 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0912%15 Sept
cache6–13-0.0113%15 Sept
vertigo2–13-0.0918%15 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0614%15 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0316%15 Sept
nuke4–130.025%15 Sept
cache13–6-0.0217%15 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0112%13 Sept
ancient13–1-0.0124%13 Sept
cache7–13-0.069%13 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0612%13 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0113%12 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0513%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0712%12 Sept
mirage6–13-0.044%12 Sept
cache13–5-0.046%12 Sept
inferno7–9-0.063%11 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0322%11 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0316%11 Sept
cache8–13-0.0515%11 Sept
anubis5–13-0.117%11 Sept
mirage13–8-0.073%11 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0612%11 Sept
inferno13–40.0117%11 Sept
cache10–130.0214%11 Sept
nuke13–40.0117%9 Sept
ancient13–9-0.040%9 Sept
vertigo5–1-0.0414%9 Sept
cache4–13-0.035%9 Sept
train9–13-0.0013%6 Sept
cache5–13-0.110%6 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0224%6 Sept
train7–13-0.089%5 Sept
anubis13–20.014%5 Sept
overpass13–11-0.106%4 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0210%4 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0111%4 Sept
cache8–13-0.050%4 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0410%4 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0412%4 Sept
ancient11–130.029%3 Sept
nuke12–12-0.057%3 Sept
vertigo13–4-0.075%3 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0916%2 Sept
anubis13–7-0.034%2 Sept
inferno13–40.066%2 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0517%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0314%2 Sept
cache12–12-0.0320%28 Aug
mirage5–130.0416%28 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0113%27 Aug
anubis7–130.0018%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.073%27 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0813%27 Aug
cache13–5-0.0618%27 Aug
vertigo13–60.0146%27 Aug
nuke12–12-0.048%27 Aug
train13–7-0.025%27 Aug
cache13–6-0.0410%26 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.079%26 Aug
mirage13–60.035%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0311%26 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2820%26 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.1524%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.076%26 Aug
anubis13–8-0.038%26 Aug
overpass8–8-0.0819%25 Aug
eldorado9–4-0.0319%25 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0214%25 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.076%25 Aug
nuke13–10.099%25 Aug
anubis4–13-0.1121%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0416%25 Aug
ancient2–00.020%25 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.077%23 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0821%23 Aug
train13–9-0.0119%23 Aug
nuke13–8-0.058%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.030%23 Aug
anubis13–110.0213%23 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0911%23 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0914%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →