slucko — CS2 Stats

US76561198063899485[U:1:103633757]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,897Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,757Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4753 of 13655 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,932 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning39

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0

Aggression3.8

Utility6.2

Positioning3.9

Opening Duels0.5

Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning3.9

Utility6.2

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time536ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — anubis 8–13

13–2Biggest win — vertigo

4Longest win streak

W3Current streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 46% over 28

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	28	13–15	46%	-0.01
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.01
cache	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.02
ancient	B	14	7–7	50%	0.00
nuke	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
anubis	S	8	6–2	75%	0.01
vertigo	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
dust2	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

885Matches

52%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

75.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	265	49%	1.01	14.9
Inferno	138	58%	0.99	14.7
Ancient	127	47%	0.99	14.9
Anubis	98	54%	1.13	16.5
Dust2	60	53%	1.12	15.1
Nuke	50	42%	0.99	14.1
Train	36	50%	1.08	16.4
Vertigo	29	62%	1.14	16.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy

31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

78.5%Counter-strafing

11.0°Preaim

529msReaction time

23.1%T opening success

41.2%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

8.7%Flash assists

7.43HE damage / grenade

16.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.1307% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–3	0.01	8%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	20%	27 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.00	22%	27 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.03	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	16%	26 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.01	17%	25 Aug →
cache	19–16	-0.01	27%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	19%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	0.03	15%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.10	13%	21 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	20%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	16%	21 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	20%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	19%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	29%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	30%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.05	13%	20 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	22%	20 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	10%	20 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.06	26%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.04	42%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	14%	19 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	35%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	20%	19 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	24%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	27%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	19%	18 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	23%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	19%	17 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	25%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	11%	16 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.10	20%	16 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	22%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	24%	15 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	9%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.09	14%	14 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	17%	14 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.07	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	16%	13 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.00	28%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	28%	13 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	27%	12 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.09	21%	12 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	35%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.06	20%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.02	30%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.03	22%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	11%	9 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.03	26%	9 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.08	31%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.06	20%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	18%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.00	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	24%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	26%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.01	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	23%	7 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	21%	7 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.01	14%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	15%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.09	27%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	15%	2 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.03	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.00	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	27%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	24%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	24%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.05	9%	1 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.02	27%	1 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	17%	1 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.04	18%	1 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	31%	1 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	27%	1 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.09	22%	1 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	24%	1 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	14%	31 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.04	19%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	17%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	18%	31 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	27%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.04	29%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.08	29%	27 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.07	29%	27 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.10	25%	25 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.05	0%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	22%	25 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	21%	25 Jul →