RGood

RGood — CS2 Stats

US76561198063294402[U:1:103028674]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,869Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,718 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,718 → 1,718
+3Tracked matches · now 1,869
−6.7ppWin rate · 43.3% → 36.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 21 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,486 +2,851 31 Jul22 Sept · 16 days played
23,63526,791peak 26,79131 Jul22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,718 +0 28 Aug24 Sept · 5 observations
1,7181,718peak 1,71828 Aug24 Sept
26,791Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,718Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,718
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRGoodFACEITLevel 7 · 1,718 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,718csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning48
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46531Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 45% on T to 14% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.8
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time532ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 30 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 27 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · mirage, 30 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L4Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB28131546%-0.02
nukeC2381535%-0.01
dust2C1881044%0.01
mirageB136746%0.01
anubisS75271%-0.01
cacheC73443%0.01
inferno43175%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

891Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
78.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18349%1.1715.8
Ancient17052%1.1215.7
Dust213950%1.1115.4
Anubis10941%1.1016.0
Inferno10060%1.1815.7
Nuke9147%1.0214.7
Vertigo3352%1.1416.8
Train2669%1.1418.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
539msReaction time
45.1%T opening success
13.6%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.52HE damage / grenade
11.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 13.5901% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient3–13-0.0611%23 Sept
nuke9–130.0715%22 Sept
anubis11–13-0.1010%22 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0613%22 Sept
anubis13–70.0318%22 Sept
dust210–13-0.0311%20 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0027%20 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0111%19 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0314%19 Sept
anubis13–90.0517%19 Sept
ancient13–100.0323%19 Sept
mirage13–160.0422%13 Sept
inferno18–220.0115%12 Sept
dust26–130.0120%11 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0711%9 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0519%9 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0716%5 Sept
nuke6–130.0114%5 Sept
cache13–10-0.0217%1 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0911%31 Aug
nuke11–13-0.046%31 Aug
mirage13–110.0425%31 Aug
ancient13–10.1414%30 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0215%30 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0710%30 Aug
dust27–13-0.0415%30 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0520%29 Aug
nuke13–90.0416%29 Aug
mirage13–40.0914%29 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0221%28 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0117%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.048%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0022%15 Aug
dust210–13-0.0324%15 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0014%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0213%14 Aug
ancient13–50.0216%13 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0217%12 Aug
dust212–16-0.039%12 Aug
anubis13–110.0213%10 Aug
ancient13–20.0218%10 Aug
dust225–22-0.0020%9 Aug
ancient15–19-0.0320%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0523%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0322%8 Aug
mirage13–40.0317%8 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0218%8 Aug
dust213–50.0517%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0923%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0620%8 Aug
cache14–160.0415%8 Aug
dust213–60.0416%7 Aug
nuke10–130.0017%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0521%7 Aug
ancient10–13-0.069%7 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0613%4 Aug
dust23–13-0.0215%3 Aug
nuke7–130.0221%3 Aug
cache13–90.0516%3 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0719%3 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0412%3 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0624%2 Aug
dust213–10.0720%2 Aug
dust28–130.0218%2 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0512%2 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0317%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0215%2 Aug
nuke13–40.0821%1 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0117%1 Aug
mirage12–160.0412%1 Aug
dust213–11-0.0215%1 Aug
nuke13–90.0233%31 Jul
dust210–130.0820%31 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0125%31 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0413%30 Jul
nuke13–80.0411%30 Jul
nuke13–4-0.048%27 Jul
dust213–100.0642%27 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0319%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0524%27 Jul
cache12–16-0.0016%27 Jul
nuke13–90.009%26 Jul
ancient13–20.0127%26 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0020%25 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0314%25 Jul
dust219–160.0413%25 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0314%25 Jul
cache13–16-0.0125%24 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0114%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0623%24 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0724%24 Jul
cache11–13-0.0215%23 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0210%23 Jul
ancient9–130.0314%23 Jul
cache13–100.0217%22 Jul
ancient13–100.0019%22 Jul
inferno16–140.0012%22 Jul
dust22–13-0.046%22 Jul
ancient13–60.029%22 Jul
ancient16–130.0220%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →