Lycan 𓂀 — CS2 Stats

CA76561198063124407[U:1:102858679]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,297Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,496Hours in CS38Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating19,160Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#93994 of 252248 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,060 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,160 -221 30 Aug – 15 Oct · 25 days played

21,725Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,060Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

24Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,060
Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 141 to go
Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

2,184 below peak (21,344)
-1,175 over 30 days · declining
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 840 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	39.6%	43.7%	44.8%	5.2% short
Shot accuracy	17.9%	12.0%	12.4%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.05	1.02	1.03	meets
Match win rate	45.2%	44.7%	45.2%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning66

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–58–4Last 10038%Win rateLLWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

7–13 · 35% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.0

Utility5.9

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels4.9

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning6.6

Utility5.9

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels6.4

Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time546ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms

Headshot accuracy14.3%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 11 Oct →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–6 · rush_001, 1 Oct →

203msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 8 Oct →

13–2Biggest win · anubis, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

L2Current streak

3–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 14dust2Weakest map · 29% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	21	6–15	29%	-0.02
anubis	D	18	6–12	33%	-0.00
cache	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.00
mirage	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.00
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.03
nuke	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
inferno	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.00
rush_001	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.25

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,681Lifetime kills

1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players

3,717Matches

45.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

39.6%Headshot %

17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 5 players

8,032MVPs

1,963Hours (in match)

3,741Bombs planted

900Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,197

AWP16,034

M4A4 / M4A1-S12,767

P2000 / USP-S4,018

Desert Eagle2,967

Glock-182,689

SSG 081,883

FAMAS1,682

P2501,556

Galil AR1,437

Lifetime map wins

8,884inferno

3,957dust2

2,760train

2,072nuke

2,064vertigo

840cbble

87office

10lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

541Matches

50%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

85.9ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	8	50%	1.20	18.9
Mirage	6	50%	1.06	16.8
Ancient	5	80%	1.12	16.6
Inferno	3	67%	0.92	12.0
Nuke	3	67%	1.07	15.7
Anubis	1	100%	1.24	21.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

85.0%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

561msReaction time

59.6%T opening success

51.7%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

4.9%Flash assists

9.91HE damage / grenade

12.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.5572% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	8–13	-0.05	17%	15 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	10%	15 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	19%	15 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	8%	15 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	22%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	15%	13 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.04	10%	13 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.03	12%	13 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.02	6%	13 Oct →
inferno	1–13	0.01	22%	13 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	11%	13 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	17%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.00	19%	12 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.00	18%	12 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.10	15%	11 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	9%	11 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.03	12%	11 Oct →
cache	12–6	-0.01	9%	11 Oct →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	12%	11 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.01	23%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.01	20%	10 Oct →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	8%	10 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	24%	9 Oct →
cache	13–9	-0.01	16%	9 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	10%	9 Oct →
anubis	5–13	0.06	19%	9 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.08	14%	9 Oct →
cache	13–16	0.04	17%	9 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	9%	9 Oct →
cache	1–13	-0.06	14%	8 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.00	21%	8 Oct →
ancient	3–13	-0.13	0%	8 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.00	13%	7 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.05	15%	7 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.09	12%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	13%	7 Oct →
cache	15–15	-0.02	12%	5 Oct →
nuke	13–7	0.03	9%	5 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.09	5%	5 Oct →
inferno	8–13	0.00	11%	4 Oct →
anubis	14–16	0.01	13%	4 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	8%	4 Oct →
anubis	13–4	0.03	9%	4 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	13%	4 Oct →
dust2	15–15	-0.05	31%	4 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.03	20%	3 Oct →
nuke	11–13	0.01	17%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	21%	3 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.04	18%	2 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.05	17%	2 Oct →
anubis	13–4	0.04	13%	1 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.01	24%	1 Oct →
anubis	13–2	0.00	13%	1 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	21%	1 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	14%	1 Oct →
rush_001	2–6	-0.25	50%	1 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.06	26%	30 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.01	13%	30 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.08	21%	30 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.01	8%	30 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	8%	29 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	12%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.08	11%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.03	17%	27 Sept →
inferno	13–8	0.05	13%	26 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.05	12%	26 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.09	18%	25 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.03	10%	25 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	18%	25 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	15%	24 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.02	7%	24 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	16%	24 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.06	19%	24 Sept →
ancient	6–13	0.08	8%	24 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	20%	17 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.04	14%	17 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	10%	17 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	19%	17 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.04	22%	17 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	12%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.04	14%	14 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	4%	14 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	6%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–3	0.02	21%	10 Sept →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	10%	10 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	14%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	19%	10 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	11%	10 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	4%	10 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.07	10%	10 Sept →
ancient	13–3	0.09	6%	3 Sept →
ancient	8–0	0.10	18%	3 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	14%	3 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	14%	3 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.07	10%	3 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.05	22%	3 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.03	10%	3 Sept →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	11%	3 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	4%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	23%	31 Aug →