RaBB1T

RaBB1T — CS2 Stats

76561198062630926[U:1:102365198]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,095Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,237Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,917Purple band · top ~20.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 970 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 7 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,917 +1,354 7 Aug12 Sept · 29 days played
12,90317,402peak 17,4027 Aug12 Sept
Faceit ELO: 970 +0 28 Aug3 Sept · 3 observations
970970peak 97028 Aug3 Sept
17,656Peak Premier in tracked matches
970Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 970
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 81 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 485 below peak (17,402)
  • +2,124 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,083 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate67.4%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy11.9%12.6%12.2%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.200.960.98above
Match win rate38.9%42.5%43.3%4.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaBB1TFACEITLevel 2 · 970 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER16,917 · Purple bandPEAK ELO970csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning48
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateLLWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.8
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time588ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 25 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 17 Aug
461msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 30 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 25 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
145In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 22anubisWeakest map · 9% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2215768%-0.01
infernoC167944%-0.03
mirageB168850%0.00
cacheA149564%0.00
ancientS128467%0.04
anubisD111109%-0.00
nukeA95456%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

156,728Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
3,585Matches
38.9%Match win rate
67.4%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 2 players
11.9%Shot accuracy
7,413MVPs
7,866Hours (in match)
1,758Bombs planted
1,116Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4777,992
AWP16,370
MP93,034
SSG 082,476
MAC-101,804

Lifetime map wins

5,784dust2
4,976inferno
2,671nuke
2,273vertigo
1,351train
50italy
47office
31safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

152Matches
43%Win rate
0.64Avg K/D
58.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5042%0.6510.2
Dust22157%0.6010.0
Ancient1753%0.7112.1
Anubis1533%0.6010.2
Inferno1173%0.9112.6
Nuke729%0.599.9
Cache425%0.5613.3
Overpass20%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
14.8°Preaim
589msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
62.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
14.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 14.7631° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7722% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.046%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0015%9 Sept
ancient13–50.066%9 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0217%9 Sept
inferno3–13-0.148%7 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0217%7 Sept
dust28–13-0.0116%5 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0328%5 Sept
dust213–11-0.0117%4 Sept
cache13–50.0014%4 Sept
mirage15–15-0.039%4 Sept
ancient13–50.0517%4 Sept
inferno13–60.020%3 Sept
cache13–3-0.027%3 Sept
nuke13–11-0.036%3 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0310%2 Sept
dust213–100.0113%2 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0431%2 Sept
inferno11–13-0.049%2 Sept
anubis10–130.029%2 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0620%1 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0426%1 Sept
mirage13–110.0315%31 Aug
ancient13–80.049%31 Aug
mirage13–70.0914%31 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0018%30 Aug
cache5–13-0.066%30 Aug
dust22–130.0118%30 Aug
nuke16–120.0018%30 Aug
dust213–11-0.0410%29 Aug
anubis14–160.0011%29 Aug
dust213–110.1210%27 Aug
dust213–80.0220%27 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0415%27 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0011%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0122%26 Aug
ancient13–20.1710%25 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0515%25 Aug
cache13–80.0213%25 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0614%24 Aug
dust213–110.0713%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0920%24 Aug
cache13–30.0914%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0519%23 Aug
mirage13–20.0112%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.0112%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0615%23 Aug
ancient7–130.0530%23 Aug
ancient16–140.0813%22 Aug
dust22–13-0.0915%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0516%21 Aug
dust213–110.0417%21 Aug
inferno13–30.0111%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0414%21 Aug
anubis15–150.0619%21 Aug
dust216–14-0.0417%20 Aug
dust213–8-0.0413%20 Aug
inferno13–30.0120%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0212%17 Aug
nuke13–40.1027%17 Aug
cache11–13-0.029%17 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0413%17 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0942%17 Aug
cache13–60.0223%17 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0218%17 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0416%15 Aug
ancient9–130.028%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.0121%15 Aug
cache13–30.0314%15 Aug
anubis7–130.0016%15 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0215%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0116%14 Aug
cache13–40.0619%14 Aug
anubis6–13-0.045%14 Aug
inferno16–140.0117%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0312%14 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0217%13 Aug
dust213–60.0012%13 Aug
nuke13–9-0.027%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.0526%12 Aug
mirage14–160.0413%12 Aug
dust211–130.0118%12 Aug
dust216–120.0419%11 Aug
anubis9–130.0533%11 Aug
mirage9–130.0620%11 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0326%10 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0218%10 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0013%10 Aug
cache13–7-0.0025%10 Aug
dust213–10-0.0611%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0317%9 Aug
inferno3–130.0126%9 Aug
mirage15–150.0318%9 Aug
dust213–70.0115%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0025%9 Aug
dust215–15-0.0216%7 Aug
dust23–13-0.0332%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0516%7 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0415%7 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0416%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →