eebis

eebis — CS2 Stats

FI76561198062115203[U:1:101849475]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

835Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,545Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,086 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 835 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 17 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,502 -93 17 Jan20 Apr · 24 days played
15,83919,569peak 19,56917 Jan20 Apr
19,569Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,086Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-01-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,086
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 115 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.4%43.8%44.8%4.4% short
Shot accuracy14.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.021.040.09 short
Match win rate40.1%44.7%45.2%5.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeebisFACEITLevel 5 · 1,086 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,086csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning54
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46486Last 10046%Win rateLWLTWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time616ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 21 Jan
36%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · nuke, 16 Mar
469msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 12 Feb
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 19 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC23101343%-0.00
infernoA22121055%0.02
mirageD1331023%-0.02
dust2D124833%-0.04
nukeB115645%0.02
anubisS118373%0.04
overpassB63350%0.05
cache21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,765Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
5,947Matches
40.1%Match win rate
40.4%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
11,423MVPs
2,545Hours (in match)
4,243Bombs planted
1,942Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,487
AWP18,458
MP74,158
P902,931
Tec-92,033

Lifetime map wins

23,966inferno
3,753dust2
3,184nuke
2,445cbble
836train
291vertigo
211lake
132safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

799Matches
48%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
71.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5753%1.0013.7
Anubis4240%0.9914.5
Ancient4146%0.8613.2
Nuke1443%0.8315.2
Mirage850%0.8014.1
Dust2617%0.568.8
Overpass333%0.8913.0
Vertigo1100%1.0814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
29.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
618msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
12.64HE damage / grenade
7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8889% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0317%10 Aug
cache13–80.0618%7 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0135%28 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0633%21 Jun
dust213–9-0.0932%20 Apr
overpass13–90.1117%19 Apr
nuke13–20.0713%19 Apr
anubis9–130.0622%19 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0523%18 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0718%18 Apr
dust211–13-0.0810%18 Apr
ancient13–70.0718%19 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0018%19 Mar
dust24–13-0.0512%19 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0036%16 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0314%16 Mar
inferno13–40.1216%14 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0625%14 Mar
inferno5–130.0729%14 Mar
nuke8–130.0628%14 Mar
anubis13–90.0527%14 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0610%13 Mar
anubis15–150.0612%13 Mar
dust212–16-0.0321%13 Mar
nuke13–40.0328%12 Mar
dust22–13-0.0611%12 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0314%12 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0217%8 Mar
dust215–15-0.0618%8 Mar
dust24–13-0.1021%7 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0311%7 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0125%7 Mar
dust213–9-0.0222%6 Mar
inferno13–70.0621%6 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0115%6 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0224%6 Mar
overpass13–90.0326%6 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0113%5 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0324%5 Mar
anubis7–130.0219%5 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0222%12 Feb
inferno13–20.0332%12 Feb
mirage0–13-0.085%12 Feb
overpass8–130.0518%12 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0528%12 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0520%10 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0322%10 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0019%10 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0816%7 Feb
dust22–13-0.0817%7 Feb
inferno13–110.0126%7 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0124%5 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0915%5 Feb
dust27–13-0.0517%4 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0316%4 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0410%4 Feb
inferno13–50.0318%4 Feb
dust213–90.0617%3 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0313%3 Feb
anubis13–80.0214%3 Feb
overpass7–130.0414%2 Feb
ancient13–20.0518%2 Feb
anubis13–80.0920%2 Feb
mirage16–120.0320%2 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0420%1 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0120%30 Jan
nuke9–130.016%29 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0027%29 Jan
inferno13–40.0417%29 Jan
mirage8–130.0322%28 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0113%27 Jan
overpass13–110.0414%27 Jan
inferno4–130.0114%27 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0016%26 Jan
mirage4–130.0229%26 Jan
ancient8–130.0310%26 Jan
dust213–50.1013%26 Jan
ancient6–13-0.015%26 Jan
inferno13–50.0619%24 Jan
nuke13–110.068%24 Jan
inferno13–70.0211%24 Jan
ancient13–70.0823%24 Jan
anubis13–100.0621%23 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0419%23 Jan
overpass9–130.0413%23 Jan
ancient7–13-0.017%23 Jan
anubis13–70.0115%23 Jan
ancient11–130.0416%23 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0210%22 Jan
ancient15–150.0319%22 Jan
ancient13–40.1211%21 Jan
inferno12–120.0813%21 Jan
anubis13–40.1519%21 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0512%19 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0127%19 Jan
ancient10–130.0416%18 Jan
inferno9–130.0725%18 Jan
inferno13–90.0823%18 Jan
nuke13–90.0914%17 Jan
inferno7–130.0123%17 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →